The largest eremite organisation in a universe would be a Abrahamic faiths. Islam calls them a People of a Book (Ahl al-Kitb in Arabic), a term used to appropriate non-Muslims to whom a scriptures have been revealed. The 3 sorts of adherents to faiths which a Qur'an mentions as People of a Book have been a Jews, Sabians as well as Christians as well as Islam recognises all 3 of these religions. There have been most references in a Qur'an regarding a People of a Book.
NO HOLDS BARRED
Raja Petra Kamarudin
Many religionists do not understand their own sacrament let alone a sacrament of others. It is even worse for Muslims since they have been taught not to turn as well informed with non-Islamic religions lest they get shabby or turn 'misled' by 'false teachings', which may outcome in them apropos apostates, or during a very least 'confused'.
Hence Muslims will insulate as well as isolate themselves from a alternative religions as well as will, for sure, not want to investigate into a non-Islamic religions even for academic purposes. They would rsther than sojourn ignorant than turn cordial as well as may be violate Islam in any way, unwittingly or otherwise.
you try to make Muslims understand which knowledge is energy as well as this would include knowledge about a alternative religions, as well as there have been certainly most indeed. However, most Muslims would be of a perspective which by celebration of a mass up on a alternative religions this may display you to a risk of permitting Satan to trick you. In fact, a Muslims hold you should not even be celebration of a mass up on your own sacrament as well as if you want to sense afterwards go find out aguruorustazand sense from him.
Books cont! ingency never be your teacher, they will argue. If you rely on books for knowledge, afterwards Satan will turn your teacher. Hence you contingency sense from a tellurian clergyman to avoid Satan apropos your clergyman when you attempt to sense from books reduction a tellurian teacher.
Muslims have been additionally of a perspective which all comes underneath theology. Even a story about religions is considered theology. But divinity is about convictions whilst story is about events. And whilst convictions deals with faith, story deals with events. So since can't divinity as well as story be separated?
The risk with lumping story underneath divinity would be which story competence be tailored or doctored to fit into a dogma. Hence story may need to be 'adjusted' so which it does not protest dogma. In alternative words, during your convenience convictions as well as story disagree, convictions would overrule history. History would have to be 'rewritten' to await dogma.
This is not a problem only with Muslims but with all religionists. They fear seeking during story independently of convictions lest which raises questions as to a correctness of sure peremptory teachings. Ignorance is bliss, as they say, so they rsther than sojourn in ignorance than open up a can of worms which may shake up their faith. Better you not know than you know as well as start doubting.
Religion did not fall from a sky. Religion developed as well as transformed. And this is a indicate which most religionists find hard to accept. If sacrament fell from a sky afterwards it clearly came from God. If sacrament developed as well as remade afterwards there has to be a story as well as this would mean there additionally has to be roots or origins.
The largest eremite organisation in a universe would be a Abrahamic faiths. Islam calls them a People of a Book (Ahl al-Kitb in Arabic), a term used to appropriate non-Muslims to whom a scriptures have been revealed. The 3 sorts of ad! herents to faiths which a Qur'an mentions as People of a Book have been a Jews, Sabians as well as Christians as well as Islam recognises all 3 of these religions. There have been most references in a Qur'an regarding a People of a Book.
Let us, however, rewind to progressing religions, which a little scholars consider a roots or origins of a Abrahamic faiths.
Mithraism was a sacrament popular with a Roman troops as well as was a sacrament which was brought to Britain prior to a bieing born of Christ. Eventually, a Britons as well as Saxons embraced Mithraism although there was a tug-of-war after in between paganism as well as Christianity after a Romans left as well as Christianity began to take base in Britain.
It was mainly a contest in between a druids as well as a priests as well as of march Christianity won when a kings embraced Christianity since a aristocrat had a energy to levy a genocide judgment on pagans who refused to convert to Christianity. Hence it was not convictions but a sword which won a day.
However, Mithraism itself was not originally a Roman religion. It was a Persian sacrament which was after adopted by a Greeks as well as even after by a Romans. We contingency recollect which Persia was already an sovereignty much progressing but was after replaced by a Greek Empire as well as after which by a Roman Empire.
One engaging indicate to more, though, is which Mitra is a Sanskrit word, which is found in a Rig Veda as well as equates to friend or loyalty as well as is stamped in a peace treaty in between a Hittites as well as a kingdom of Mitanni during about 1400 BC.
One very critical protocol in Mithraism is a scapegoat of a bull, which was additionally a protocol of a aged pre-Islamic Arabic religion. The gangland slaying of a longhorn is celebrated as a Mithraic New Year on 25th December, which was additionally a birthday of Mithras, a offspring of a sun. Dec 25th is additionally considered a birthday of Chr! ist as w ell as a bieing born of Christ is additionally commencement of a Christian year.
Some scholars have identified a ancient Aryan deity, who appears in Persian literature as Mithras, as a Hindu god Mitra of a Vedic hymns. Others contend which a Graeco-Roman representation of a gangland slaying of a longhorn is additionally an event in Zoroastrian cosmogony described in a Zoroastrian text.
Hence there appears to be most overlaps in between these assorted pre-Christianity as well as pre-Islamic religions. Some studies even suggest which Mithras was of a pure birth, although there is no text to await this argument, as well as Mithraism additionally has a communion, a taking of a consecrated bread as well as wine.
Zoroastrianism emerged out of a common prehistoric Indo-Iranian eremite complement dating back to early 2,000 BC. Most scholars hold which a key concepts of Zoroastrian eschatology as well as demonology shabby a Abrahamic religions. On a alternative hand, Zoroastrianism itself hereditary ideas from alternative belief systems. Hence Zoroastrianism, which is a base of a Arabic eremite belief, is itself not original.
That, in a nutshell, is what a little scholars perspective as a origins of a assorted modern-day religions. And they hold a perspective which none of today's religions have been original but evolved, remade or deteriorated from progressing religions. But this would be true only if your take into consideration their story reduction a dogma. Religionists, however, would remonstrate with this perspective as well as will demand which their sacrament is singular as well as came directly from God as well as which zero was borrowed from progressing religions.
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment