you impute to Raja Petra's essay published upon his blog "Malaysia Today" entitled "The day you met P. Balasubramaniam (part 3) which makes scandalous as well as fake allegations opposite me as well as an additional counsel M. Puravalen.
Raja Petra does his common turn of mixing law as well as novella in order to have a story receptive to advice interesting. Unfortunately for him, lies sojourn lies.
Let me give an example of how he did this only a few weeks ago upon 18.7.12 in his blog. He dramatically did this opening intro for an article:
"When Sivarasa was in a opposition, he represented Sri Aman Development opposite MBPJ. Once Pakatan Rakyat took over a Selangor State Government, Sivarasa did a U-turn. He changed sides. He became a turncoat as well as represented MBPJ opposite Sri Aman Development ..."
you have never represented Sri Aman Development opposite MBPJ or in any box for which matter. That is a novella combined by RPK. It is true which you acted for MBPJ when Sri Aman Development sued MBPJ in a authorised review action. You can read about a sum during http://sivarasa.blogspot.com/2012/01/raja-petras-scurrilous-and-dishonest.html. So RPK's difference such as "U-turn", "changed sides", "turncoat" have been all engaging sounding but in hint mischievous as well as fake statements.
In a same way, he creates fictions ( i.e. lies ) in his recent upon top of mentioned article.
Example 1 - if Bala part of murder, since wasn't he charged along with Baginda, Azilah, Sirul
RPK additionally says which during this assembly " In a participation of Sivarasa as well as Puravalen, Bala as well as his ex-police military officer friend boasted how they used to strike off criminals as well as got rid of their bodies. Azilah, Sirul as well as you were all in a same team, they laughed". This is amalicious FICTIONcreated by RPK to try to allegation me, Puravalen as well as Bala. It is fake which Bala knew Sirul as well as Azilah as well as which which actuality was done well well known to me as well as Puravalen.
RPK was invited to which assembly in Puravalen's residence a day before to a 3nd Jul press discussion to be given a pre-view of Bala's 1st SD to put up upon his blog as well as write about it which he did.
Example 2 - since doesn't RPK plead Americk & his own mother Marina?
This is a same reduction of law as well as fiction. It is true which you all went to a Italian restaurant. The rest of a allegations which you have highlighted upon top of ie which you went there to plead a press discussion as well as which you coached Bala what to contend is all a malicious distortion as well as a novella combined by RPK.
What he does not plead is which you simply went to a grill since Puravalen had a pre-arranged cooking joining there with a little alternative friends. We did not go there purely to plead a press conference. In actuality Bala was quite open about his SD as well as mentioned a contents to a others present.
RPK might wish to ask Americk for his recollection of a events during Puravalen's residence as well as additionally during a restaurant. He might additionally wish to check with his own mother Marina as she was benefaction throughout.
Example 3 - Why is RPK singing a opposite balance now?
Let me state this for a record no a single including myself offering or gave Bala any monetary inducement to have a 1st SD.
Americk Sidhu has in actuality sensitive me of a really engaging actuality - which it was RPK himself who organised a little monetary assistance for Bala after he uploaded a interviews which Bala did in Singapore in Nov 2009 which were during large reported in a Internet ( a urls have been cited in RPK's Part 3 ). you have no problem with RPK helping Bala who was by afterwards already over a year overseas. But RPK needs to be honest about since he is right away singing quite a opposite balance as well as aggressive Bala to fit a "Pakatan Rakyat"/BN script. But you suppose you cannot design anything opposite right away from RPK after his TV3 ( only before Sarawak State elections ) as well as Utusan interviews ( finish of 2011 ).
Example 4 - Deepak as well as Hamzah Zainuddin exposed
For a record, you do not go around profitable anyone to have fake statements. you would have improved use for a millions of ringgit which you would have needed to do that, which you don't have in a in! itial pl ace.
Americk Sidhu as Bala's counsel is fully wakeful of all a moves which Deepak as well as Hamzah Zainuddin done as well as documented a entire event to expose a manner in which "Pakatan Rakyat" was still trying to get Bala to backtrack upon his 1st SD.
Example 5 - even Suaram is dragged in by his lies
RPK's allegations a feeble, belated try to damage Bala's credibility
you conclude this reply by observant this. The genuine emanate is not what RPK is conjuring up now. The genuine emanate is a law about a genuine killer of Altantuya. The Malaysian open understands which Azilah as well as Sirul were merely a instruments in a attempted attempted murder of Altantuya. The genuine killer is a person or persons who directed these 2 policemen to kill her as well as dispose completely of her physique by blowing it to bits with C4 explosive.
Too most glaring connections to Najib
The subject of what Nasir Safar ( Najib's in isolation cabinet member for 20 years ) was you do pushing around slowly in a blue Proton in front of Razak Baginda's residence shortly before to a 2 policemen/killers take Altantuya away is additionally not asked.
The subject whether it is true ( as asserted in Bala's video talk in Singapore, put up by RPK himself ) which Najib's brother, Nazim Razak met him upon a night of 2nd Jul 2008 to bluster as well as additionally bribe him to redress a 1st SD) needs to be answered.
So what RPK is you do right away have been simply not pertinent side-shows to try to disprove Bala during a really late theatre of a game.
If Bala's credibility is an issue, afterwards this should have been simply resolved a long time ago with a AG charging him for creation a fake SD as well as additionally charging Americk Sidhu for aiding in which offence. The actuality which a AG refuses to do anything as well as a learned Minister Nazri ( in assign of authorised affairs ) maintains which Bala has committed no corruption speak volumes about where a law lies.
Sivarasa Rasiah, Member of Parliament for Subang.
Member of Central Leadership Council as well as Political Bureau for Parti Keadilan Rakyat
The PI Bala talk upon Youtube
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment