Is Communism the hazard to Malaysia's security? If so afterwards given have been we still friends with China, Cuba, etc., as good as given can their adults come to Malaysia as good as the adults go to their country? Is this not the hazard to the national security? If the answer is no afterwards what is wrong if Malaysians turn Communists? We have been friends with Communist countries. We can go to Communist countries as good as they as good come to Malaysia. So where is the danger?
NO HOLDS BARRED
Raja Petra Kamarudin
Okay, maybe we do not have 222 idiots in Parliament. Maybe we have usually 200 idiots in Parliament whilst the rest have been not idiots. But which is bad enough. The actuality which roughly two-thirds of the Members of Parliament have been from Barisan Nasional as good as the rest from Pakatan Rakyat equates to which the idiots come from both sides of the domestic divide.
And this is what concerns me -- which the irrationality is not confined to usually those from the government.
While it is the 'duty' of the antithesis to conflict anything as good as everything which the supervision does as good as says, as good as whilst it is the 'duty' of the supervision to do the same concerning the antithesis -- during slightest as far as Malaysians politicians have been endangered in their really unfair approach of seeking during things -- there should be sure things which they determine upon when it concerns the good of the nation. However, in the case of Malaysia's Parliament, this can never be.
And this is the great disservice to the Malaysian voters who sent these people to Parliament.
Let us take the matter ofharam(that which is criminialized by Islam). It isharamfor Muslims to splash liquor.! In fact , the ruling ofharamis not usually regarding the celebration of wine though additionally serving, buying, keeping, profiteering from, giving as presents, etc. In short, Muslims cannot be compared with wine in any way, not usually from celebration it.
Hence the State as good as Federal Religious Departments conduct raids to detain Muslims who splash as good as to detain Muslims who work in establishments which serve/sell liquor. Not usually we can't splash though we can't work in such places which understanding in wine as well.
Considering, according to the Federal Constitution of Malaysia, Islam is the religion of the Federation, as good as if this is the law, afterwards we have no problems with that. Until such the time the Constitution is nice we shall have to live with which law, either we cruise which law the good law or the bad law. The law is the law, as they say. Of course, they additionally contend which the law is an ass, though which would be an additional discussion for an additional time.
As we said, we have no problems with this if which is the law. But we do have problems with this when the law is applied to usually the establishments owned/managed by non-Malays whilst the establishments owned/managed by Malays have been exempted from this law.
For example, we have personally seen Malaysia's national airlines, MAS, portion wine to Muslims. And we saw this even during the month ofRamadhanwhen these Muslims have been ostensible to be fasting as good as should not be celebration H2O let alone liquor. And the MAS personnel who were portion these Muslim business have been Muslims as well.
So what do we have here? Muslims working in the Malay-managed as good as Malaysian government-owned airline portion Muslims wine during the 'holy' month ofRamadhan. Is this double standard? What excuse can the supervision offer for the 'exemption' given to MAS which would never be given to the club or pub owned by, ! say, the Chinese?
Can we see how treacherous this is? And what have been the 222 Members of Parliament we do about this? Nothing!
Next point. Malaysian Muslims have been criminialized from following the Shia dogma. Many Malaysians who embraced Shi'ism have been arrested as good as sent for rehabilitation. It is the crime for the Malaysian Muslim to turn the Shia.
But it is usually the crime to turn the Shia if we have been the Malaysian. If we have been the immigrant it is not the crime. Why is that? What is wrong with becoming the Shia? Is Shi'ism dangerous? Is it the deviant sect? If Shi'ism is criminialized afterwards it should be the crime not usually for Malaysians though additionally for everyone, non-Malaysians included.
we mean: Malaysia wants to anathema happy entertainers from entering the country. If we have been happy afterwards we have been not acquire to perform in Malaysia. A happy lifestyle is forbidden. Both the Malaysian Prime Minister as good as the Malaysian Opposition Leader determine upon this (at slightest there is the single thing which they determine on). So gays have been not acquire in Malaysia as it 'sends the wrong message' to the Malaysian youth.
However, whilst gays have been not acquire in Malaysia, Shias have been not subjected to the same ban. We send Malaysian gays to prison. We send Malaysian Shias to prison. We anathema foreigners who have been gay. But we do not anathema foreigners who have been Shia. This is the partial which we do not understand.
Iran has an Embassy in Malaysia. Malaysia has an Embassy in Iran. Iranians who have been Shias have been authorised into Malaysia. Malaysians have been authorised into Iran. But we detain as good as jail Malaysians who turn Shias. And we do not detain as good as jail Shias who have been not Malaysians.
Can we see how treacherous this is? And what have been the 222 Members of Parliament we do about this? Nothing!
In May 1! 974, Tun Abdul Razak Hussein, who became Malaysia's Second Prime Minister in September 1970, visited China. In December 1989, the Malaysian Government as good as the Communist Party of Malays (CPM) sealed the Peace Treaty in Hat Yai, Thailand. Hence the 'war' (called 'The Emergency') strictly ended.
In the past, Malaysians were criminialized from travelling to Israel, South Africa, Cuba, China as good as Russia. Now, Malaysians have been usually criminialized from travelling to Israel. South Africa, Cuba, China as good as Russia have been now the friends. Only Israel is still the enemy.
But Cuba as good as China as good as still Communist. However, they have been no longer the enemies. Tun Razak went to China in 1974 when the 'war' was still on. It was usually fifteen years after in 1989 which the 'war' strictly ended.
Hence we became friends with China even whilst the 'war' was still on. But Communism was criminialized in Malaysia. However, we could turn friends with Communist China even though we were still strictly during fight as good as even though China backed the 'war' as good as gave refuge or domestic asylum to the CPM leaders.
Then, fifteen years later, the Peace Treaty was sealed as good as hence ended the war. Malaysians can go to China as good as Chinese can come to Malaysia. Malaysia has an Embassy in China as good as China has an Embassy in Malaysia. But Communism is still criminialized in Malaysia until today.
Okay, so gays have been enemies. Shias have been enemies. Communists have been enemies. And, in Malaysia, gays, Shias as good as Communists have been arrested as good as jailed. But Iran as good as China have been not enemies. Only Shias as good as Communists are.
Can we see how treacherous this is? And what have been the 222 Members of Parliament we do about this? Nothing!
Is Communism the hazard to Malaysia's security? If so afterwards given have been we still friends with China, Cuba, etc., ! as good as given can their adults come to Malaysia as good as the adults go to their country? Is this not the hazard to the national security? If the answer is no afterwards what is wrong if Malaysians turn Communists? We have been friends with Communist countries. We can go to Communist countries as good as they as good come to Malaysia. So where is the danger?
The supervision makes it seem like Communism is usually compared with the Malaysian Chinese or China. Actually there have been most Communist countries or Communist governments/coalitions all over the world (China, Cuba, Laos, Vietnam, North Korea, Cyprus, Nepal, Brazil, Peru, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Syria, Ukraine, Uruguay, etc.). And we have been friends with all of them.
And have the look during the design next as good as see how most Malays have been amongst the CPM leadership. The CPM is not the Chinese thing during all.
Abdullah CD third from left in the organisation print with Chin Peng (centre) as good as members of the CPM's 10th Regiment (from left) his wife Suriani, Rashid Maidin, Abu Samah Mohd Kassim, Ibrahim Chik as good as Abdullah Sudin.
It is time which we carried the anathema upon Communism. Sure, the Communists were once the rivalry as good as the 'war' in Malaysia took the complicated toll upon members of Malaysia's confidence forces/police as good as upon the municipal population. There were most victims of the The Emergency. But do not forget, The Emergency was enlarged not usually given of the CPM though additionally given of China as good as Vietnam who supported the CPM in their effort to disintegrate the government. If we have forgiven China as good as Vietnam given is Communism still banned?
If the objection to unbanning Communism is given of the death as good as drop which The Emergency brought to th! e countr y, afterwards the Japanese as good should be criminialized given the Japanese Occupation of Malaya brought some-more wretchedness to the nation compared to The Emergency. we can't assimilate given the Japanese have been not treated with colour the same approach which the Communists are. After all, did not the CPM assistance the British fight the Japanese during World War Two?
Can we see how treacherous this is? And what have been the 222 Members of Parliament we do about this? Nothing!
******************************************
Ex-police chief: Unfair to keep out Chin Peng
(Malaysiakini, 30 November 2009) - Communist Party of Malaya (CPM) leader Chin Peng, 85, has the right to lapse to Malaysia during slightest upon the amicable visit, pronounced former inspector-general of police Abdul Rahim Noor.
This, he said, is supposing for in the Hatyai Peace Accord sealed upon December 2, 1989 between the CPM as good as Malaysian supervision to finish the little 40 years of comrade insurgency.
"I go strictly by the suggestion of the agreement. First of all, (it) covers all levels of CPM members from the bottom-most to the highest-most," he pronounced in an talk to mark the 20th anniversary of the covenant upon Wednesday.
"If we cruise Chin Peng as the highest leader in the hierarchy, afterwards it covers (everyone from him) right to the bottom-most (personnel)."
Chin Peng, who genuine name is Ong Boon Hua, was innate in Sitiawan, Perak, though now lives in southern Thailand. His chance to the Malaysian courts to be authorised to lapse has failed, as good as the supervision has given reiterated which he is barred from we do so.
Abdul Rahim, 66, pronounced the terms allow those innate in afterwards Malaya to lapse home if they chose to.
"But they had to give the supervision indication inside of twelve months from the date of the assent agreement,! either they (would) come behind or not.
"Those who failed to do so, or (who) for the little reason (felt) they didn't wish to come behind (permanently), would still be authorised to come behind any time upon the amicable visit, though not for good to solve down in this country.
"I consider it is upon this basement of the agreement which the vast infancy of them were authorised (to return), young as good as old."
The assent covenant was sealed by Chin Peng as good as Rashid Maidin (representing CPM) as good as Abdul Rahim as good as Megat Junid Megat Ayub (then emissary home minister) who represented the Malaysian supervision in Hatyai, Thailand.
Abdul Rahim voiced warn during the government's refusal of this right to Chin Peng, as good as the new justice preference to block his return.
"I do not know if Ching Peng did request to come behind inside of the specified duration of time the twelve months effective from the time of the assent agreement.
"Assuming which he did not request to come behind inside of which period, formed upon the agreement he should (still) be authorised (in) upon the amicable visit."
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment