Serving a people. The other day, we went in to a Malaysiakini CEO's chatter to give my unsolicited dual sen's worth about because a encountering MPs of Pakatan Rakyat should just concentration upon portion a people instead of worrying about winning a (general) election. we am a follower that if an elected repute functions hard for a Rakyat, he or she will many expected be re-elected ...
But it is so easy to get carried away once politics has used up you ,,,
... that brings me to a title of this posting: Is Nurul Izzah working for Amcorp now?
After celebration of a mass Big Dog's posting Someone should discuss it Nurul Izzah Ramadan is a month of repentance, we went onto Twitter as well as asked of a Lembah Pantai MP's genuine interest in a air traffic complement deal. "Is Amcop regulating her or is she regulating Amcop?"
From alayman's point of view, we don't see how or because a contest (or dispute?) between dual corporations (Amcop vs AAT?) should concern YB Nurul, especially given "the Malaysian ATC complement has shown no air misses a past seventeen years".Is she kicking a fuss because a son of her daddy's opposition functions as well as binds shares in AAT (the association that won a deal) or does she have an interest - a! pproach or surreptitious - in Amcop? Either way, it is interesting to note that AAT's bid for a plan is considerably lower than Amcop's!
As a journalist, it amuses me that while a reportWinner of KLIA air traffic complement bid not up to standardsheavily quotes Nurul Izzah upon Amcop as well as AAT, Premesh's Malaysiakini carries a Editor's note during a end of a article to say that "Malaysiakini has contacted AAT for comment upon a ultimate claim as well as is waiting for a response".
Who are a people at the back of Amcop? Shouldn't Malaysiakini be equally interested in Amcop's response, too?
I am. [Especially given Big Dog seems to consider that there is a connection between a expert of a understanding from Aecom with Amcop, a Department of Civil Aviation. Read his posting again h e r e].
No comments:
Post a Comment