The preference of words which Malaysians make use of reveals what runs by their head. And most Malaysians exhibit which they have been bigots who demeanour down upon those not of their same competition or religion. Whether they have been supporters of Barisan Nasional or Pakatan Rakyat does not matter. They have been all a same, bigots of a highest degree. And a comments inMalaysia Todayonly serves to infer this.
NO HOLDS BARRED
Raja Petra Kamarudin
I might be a muslim though i positively apply oneself you. if they do put we in jail, modify as most as we can. be liek a shoe throwing imam. these umno bastrads shud be a ones in jail. any way if we have been still in prison as well as PR takes over as well as we prison people like pairin, his hermit jeffrey, joe kurup, joseph balang, joseph gamdum, idris jala, peter chin fcuk kui, ling leong sik- we can give them confession. as well as if we find murphy pakiam guilty of selling out assunta - afterwards i will insist he be jailed as well as well as only suppose - an archbishop starting to clergyman for confession...(A criticism by 'Mohd Ali' in a news item 'Catholic clergyman prefers prison than pay excellent if guilty of illegal assembly').
***************************************
That was a criticism by someone posting as 'Mohd Ali' in a news item'Catholic clergyman prefers prison than pay excellent if guilty of illegal assembly'. we have not finished any editing to a criticism as well as as we can see it is a really bad criticism with so most typos as well as errors. Either 'Mohd Ali' is someone of really low education/intelligence or he is a single really qu! iescent bugger (or might be both). And what's wrong with regulating capital letters for proper nouns? Is it which much trouble to do this?
This criticism by 'Mohd Ali' additionally reveals something really critical about a Malaysian mentality. Malaysians, by as well as large, have been bigots. Then they try to impress us which they have been not bigots by creation a criticism which is even some-more revealing. Hence a some-more they speak a some-more they infer which they have been bigots.
'Mohd Ali' said, "I might be a Muslim though we positively apply oneself you." What does this mean? Well, it can additionally mean, "You might not be a Muslim though we positively apply oneself you." Or we can additionally say, "You might be a Christian though we positively apply oneself you."Plus we can say, "You might be an heathen though we positively apply oneself you." All statements meant a same thing.
Why do we need to even mention a word 'Muslim'? Why can't we only contend 'I positively apply oneself we for a stand we have been taking'? Why contingency we include 'I might be a Muslim" or 'you might be a Christian' or whatever? By crafting a matter in this demeanour we have been observant which Christians do not deserve apply oneself or Muslims should not apply oneself Christians. Hence, "I might be a Muslim though we positively apply oneself you", definition we might be a Christian though we positively apply oneself we because routinely we would never apply oneself Christians.
In a recent debate about whether a Prime Minister contingency be a Malay-Muslim, we have seen comments such as 'I have no problems with a Malay Prime Minister as prolonged as he is satisfactory to a non-Malays'. Does this meant only Malay Prime Ministers contingency be satisfactory to a non-Malays? What if we have a Chinese Prime Minister? Is it okay if he is not satisfactory to a non-Malays? Must only Malay Prime Ministers be satisfactory to a non-Malays? Furthermore, do we mea! nt to co ntend which Malay Prime Ministers have been regarded as a curse though we do not thoughts this as prolonged as he is satisfactory to a non-Malays?
This is additionally like observant which routinely Malays have been not satisfactory to a non-Malays. Hence. "I don't thoughts a Malay Prime Minister as prolonged as he is satisfactory to a non-Malays." You might as well contend it is really rare to find Malays who have been satisfactory to a non-Malays. This additionally means non-Malays have been not like this. Non-Malays have been always satisfactory to a Malays. It is only Malays who have been not satisfactory to a non-Malays.
"You might be Chinese though we contingency contend we consider we have been a great person." What if we were to contend that? Would we courtesy this as a compliment or an insult? Do we meant to contend which underneath normal circumstances Chinese have been not great people? Is it rare to find a Chinese who is good? Is it normal which most Chinese have been bad people?
You might be black though we have been utterly a great person. So, routinely 'non-whites' have been bad people?
You might be Malay though we have been utterly a great person. So, routinely Malays have been bad people?
You might be Chinese though we have been utterly a great person. So, routinely Chinese have been bad people?
Islam contingency be reputable because Islam is a sacrament of a Federation. This is an additional usual statement. Does this meant a alternative religions need not be reputable given they have been not a sacrament of a federation?
Muslims endure a sacrament of others. That is an additional thing which Malays like to say. Why contingency Muslims endure a sacrament of others? Normally, things which we endure have been regarded as a nuisance.
You endure a dog shit of your neighbour's dog upon your grass because we wish to be a great neighbour. You endure a shrill music from your neighbour! 's apart ment because we do not wish to protest about a noise as well as as a result trigger dispute with your neighbour. So we endure all these nuisances for a sake of being a great neighbour. Does this meant we additionally endure Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism, etc., upon a basement which these religions have been a bloody nuisance? Other religions, dog shit as well as noise have been nuisances though have been tolerated.
The preference of words which Malaysians make use of reveals what runs by their head. And most Malaysians exhibit which they have been bigots who demeanour down upon those not of their same competition or religion. Whether they have been supporters of Barisan Nasional or Pakatan Rakyat does not matter. They have been all a same, bigots of a highest degree. And a comments inMalaysia Todayonly serves to infer this.
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment