Okay, so that equates to we take behind the citizenship from someone whom citizenship has been given. But was AmbigaGIVENher citizenship? Did she request for citizenship or is she automatically the adult given she was innate in Malaysia?
NO HOLDS BARRED
Raja Petra Kamarudin
(Bernama, 6 May 2012) - Ten non-governmental organisations (NGOs) here have urged the supervision to revoke the citizenship of Bersih co-chairman Datuk S. Ambiga as well as withdraw all titular titles awarded to her as well as opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim for being involved in an bootleg rally.
First review Article 9(1) of the Federal Constitution of Malaysia:No adult shall be outcast or released from the Federation.
Okay, we admit we am no lawyer. But we do speak English. And my bargain of English is that NO CITIZEN can be done the 'non-citizen'. Isn't that what 'no adult shall be outcast or released from the Federation' means?
So how do these people propose that the governmentrevokeAmiga's citizenship? If the adult has acted treacherously against the nation, similar to what the Al Maunah people were purported to have done, afterwards they would be charged for fraud as well as hanged, similar to what happened to the Al Maunah people. Treason is punishable by death.
However, these people have been dogmatic Ambiga the traitor as well as have been calling for the supervision to revoke her citizenship. But Article 9(1) of the Federal Constitution of Malaysia says that no adult shall be outcast or released from the Federation.
Now, what does the word 'revoke' mean?Revokemeans to blank or annul by recalling, withdrawing, reversin! g, take back, cancel, rescind, etc.
Okay, so that equates to we take behind the citizenship from someone whom citizenship has been given. But was AmbigaGIVENher citizenship? Did she request for citizenship or is she automatically the adult given she was innate in Malaysia?
we am not too certain about where Ambiga was born. Was she innate in India as well as afterwards she migrated to Malaysia as well as practical for citizenship? If so, afterwards Ibrahim Ali as well as those of his ilk might have the case. Read Articles 25(1), 16A as well as eighteen of the Federal Constitution (below).
A non-citizen can be done the citizen. And non-citizens who have been postulated citizenship can have their citizenship withdrawn. we am not starting to blow up upon this, as the details can be review below. But Articles 25(1), 16A as well as eighteen do not talk about those who have been automatically citizens by trait of being innate in Malaysia. It talks about those who practical for citizenship as well as were postulated citizenship.
Let's contend that the supervision does withdraw Ambiga's citizenship. That equates to she can no longer live in Malaysia. So where does she live? She would now be stateless. The supervision will have to chaperon her to the airport as well as force her to leave the country. But that nation does she go to?
First of all, she would no longer retain the Malaysian passport. That means, but the passport, she cannot leave the country. More importantly, but the passport, she cannot enter any alternative country.
So how does the supervision flog her out of Malaysia? As the stateless chairman she can no longer be allowed to remain in Malaysia. Hence she has to be kicked out.
Do they afterwards put her onto the small vessel as well as get the marine police to chaperon her outward Malaysia's territorial waters so that she can sail all over the world as well as try to get another nation! to allo w her entrance but the pass as well as with no well known nation of origin?
Come upon lah, Melayu! Apa ni? Jangan buat malu semua Melayu. If we wish to contend something make certain it is the judicious statement. we do not see how the supervision can take divided something that we never gave that person.
So what next? Raja Petra Kamarudin is hostile the government. Take divided his 'Raja' title. He is the disgrace to the royal family. If we occur to be the Datuk we can take that pretension divided given we gave it to me. But we can't take divided my 'Raja' title. You did not give it to me. we was innate with it. In that same context how can we take divided the citizenship of someone similar to Ambiga who was innate with it?
You can take divided Ambiga's pass though. That we do not deny. A pass is the privilege, not the right. But Ambiga's citizenship is not the privilege. It is her right. She was innate the Malaysian only similar to we was innate the Raja. And we cannot take divided what we were innate with. You can only take behind what we gave us.
***********************************
Article 25. (1) The Federal Government might by order dispossess of his citizenship any chairman who is the adult by registration underneath Article 16A or the adult by naturalisation if confident that he has shown himself by action or speech to be disloyal or disaffected towards the Federation.
Article 16A. Subject to Article 18, any chairman of or over the age of eighteen years who is upon Malaysia Day ordinarily proprietor in the State of Sabah or Sarawak is entitled, upon making application to the Federal Government prior to Sep 1971, to be purebred as the adult if he satisfies the Federal Government -
(a) that he has resided prior to Malaysia Day in the territories comprised in those States as well as after Malaysia Day in the Federation for periods that amount in the total to not reduction than 7 year! s in the 10 years immediately preceding the date of the application, as well as that embody the twelve months immediately preceding that date;
(b) that he intends to reside permanently in the Federation;
(c) that he is of good character; and
(d) solely where the application is done prior to Sep 1965, as well as the chairman submitting application has attained the age of forty-five years during the date of the application, that he has the sufficient knowledge of the Malay denunciation or the English denunciation or, in the box of an chairman submitting application ordinarily proprietor in Sarawak, the Malay language, the English denunciation or any local denunciation in current make use of in Sarawak.
Article 18.
(1) No chairman of or over the age of eighteen years shall be purebred as the adult underneath this Constitution until he has taken the promise set out in the First Schedule.
(2) Except with the approval of the Federal Government, no chairman who has renounced or has been deprived of citizenship underneath this Constitution or who has renounced or has been deprived of sovereign citizenship or citizenship of the Federation prior to Merdeka Day underneath the Federation of Malaya Agreement, 1948 shall be purebred as the adult underneath this Constitution.
(3) A chairman purebred as the adult underneath this Constitution shall be the adult by registration from the day upon that he is so registered.
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment