How can they say that only 7 or 8 persons objected to Lynas?



Only 3%objected to Lynas as well as that was only 7 or 8 persons - this is so tough to believe noting that only in Kuantan protest, there were about 15,000...

One of a members of a open consultative committee, Prof Abu Hassan Abdullah (right) pronounced only 7 or 8 out of 334 feedback forms received stated that they did not wish a plan to continue, as well as that as well though any specific reason.
Was a time as well as place to see a papers as well as submit a criticism forms unequivocally finished public? I wonder who have been this 334 who came as well as pronounced 'Yes' to Lynas - did they give a reason. Something is really fishy...

In possibly event, this process in this ICT age should have additionally been finished online....

Given a volume of criticism with regard this Lynas project, a many appropriate thing to do will be to have a REFERENDUM - during a really slightest in a area covering might be 50Km from a plan site...

And did he contend this??

The anti-Lynas! groups additionally claimed that a half-life of a thorium rubbish is fourteen billion years as well as a generation of a trickery used to store it, cannot last as prolonged as thorium.

NONERaja Abdul Aziz (right) saidthat a rubbish will sojourn fast as well as won't evacuate any deviation before it reaches a half life, so there was no need to be concerned about it.






How can this man even contend such things? No deviation until after fourteen billion years! ....

Thorium-232 has a half-life of fourteen billion (14x109) years, as well as decays by alpha emission, with concomitant gamma radiation. Thorium-232 is a top of a prolonged spoil series that contains key radionuclides such as radium-228, a direct spoil product, as well as radon-220. Two alternative isotopes of thorium, that can be poignant in a environment, have been thorium-230 as well as thorium-228. Both go to alternative spoil series. They additionally spoil by alpha emission, with concomitant gamma radiation, as well as have half-lives of 75,400 years as well as 1.9 years, respectively.

What is thorium used for?

Thorium has coloring properties that has finished it useful in ceramic glazes. But, it has been many during large used in lighting device mantles for a brightness it imparts (though alternatives have been replacing it), as well as in fusing or melting rods, that burn better with small amounts of combined thorium. Thorium improves a properties of o! phthalmi c lenses, as well as is an alloying agent in sure metals used in a aerospace industry. More than thirty years ago, thorium oxides were used in hospitals to have sure kinds of evidence X-ray photographs. But, this use has been discontinued.

Exposure to Thorium

How does thorium get in to a environment?

Natural thorium is benefaction in really small quantities in probably all rock, soil, water, plants as well as animals. Where tall concentrations start in rock, thorium might be mined as well as refined, producing rubbish products such as mill tailings. If not properly controlled, breeze as well as H2O can deliver a tailings in to a wider environment. Commercial as well as sovereign comforts that have processed thorium might additionally have expelled thorium to a air, water, or soil. Man-made thorium isotopes have been rare, as well as almost never come in a e! nvironme nt.

How does thorium shift in a environment?

As thorium-232 undergoes hot decay, it emits an alpha particle, with concomitant gamma radiation, as well as forms radium-228. This process of releasing deviation as well as forming a new radionuclide continues until fast lead-208 is formed. The half-life of thorium-232 is about fourteen billion years. Two alternative isotopes of thorium, that can be poignant in a environment, have been thorium-230 as well as thorium-228. Both spoil by alpha emission, with concomitant gamma radiation, in 75,400 years as well as 1.9 years, respectively.

How have been people unprotected to thorium?

Since thorium is naturally benefaction in a environment, people have been unprotected to small amounts in air, food as well as water. The amounts have been customarily really small as well as pose small illness hazard. Thorium is additionally benefaction in many consumer products such as ceramic glazes, lighting device mantles, as well as fusing or melting rods.
People who live nearby a trickery that mines or mills thorium, or manufactures products with thorium, might embrace higher exposures. Also, people who work with thorium in assorted industries might embrace higher exposures.

How does thorium get in to a body?

People might inhale infested dust, or swallow thorium with food or water. Living nearby a thorium infested site, or working in an attention where thorium is used, increases your possibility of exposure to thorium.

What does thorium do once it gets in to a body?

If inha led as dust, a little thorium might sojourn in a lungs for prolonged durations of time, depending upon a chemical form. If ingested, thorium typically leaves a physique by feces as well as urine within several days. The small volume of thorium left in a physique will come in a bloodstream as well as be deposited in a skeleton where it might sojourn for many years. There is a little evidence that a physique might absorb thorium by a skin, though that would not expected be a first equates to of entry.

Health Effects of Thorium

How can thorium start people's health?

The principal regard from low to assuage level exposure to ionizing deviation is increasing risk of cancer. Studies have shown that inhaling thorium dust causes an increasing risk of building lung cancer, as well as cancer of a pancreas. Bone cancer risk is additionally increasing since thorium might be stored in bone.

Only 3% pronounced 'No' to Lynas during arrangement period

Lee Long Hui
5:36PM Mar 1, 2012
Only 3 percent of a feedback received by a Atomic Energy Licensing Board (AELB) during a open arrangement of a Lynas Advanced Materials Plant's duplicate papers for a proxy operating looseness (TOL) against a project.

NONEOne of a members of a open consultative committee, Prof Abu Hassan Abdullah (right) pronounced only 7 or 8 out of 334 feedback forms received stated that they did not wish a plan ! to conti nue, as well as that as well though any specific reason.

"They only wrote like 'I do not wish Lynas' though but any reason given," he pronounced during a media briefing held by a AELB today.

Abu Hassan pronounced 97 percent of a people who submitted a feedback form "were okay" with a project, though many of them expressed low regard over a perm! anent di sposal trickery (PDF) for a hot wastes.

He pronounced that was because a cupboard had pressured a AELB to solve a PDF issue before issuing a TOL to Lynas.

Public display
The AELB had displayed a papers to a open from January 3-26 during four places - a AELB domicile in Dengkil, Selangor, a Pahang state secretariat, a AELB proxy office during a Lynas plan site as well as during a AELB easterly coast bend office in Kemaman, Terengganu.

However, a public, especially anti-Lynas groups, were unhappy, claiming that a authorities had placed restrictions upon time as well as people to check those documents.

According to a presentation by Abu Hassan, there were 334 people who legalised a papers though during a same time, there were 1,122 people who submitted feedback forms to a AELB.

He pronounced that many of a comments were unsubstantiated as well as repeated.

AELB director-general Raja Abdul Aziz Raja Adnan, who additionally presented, forked out a outrageous difference in between a series of people who legalised a papers as well as those who gave comments.

"A really large series of people did not review a papers though gave comments, so we have to ask yourself; have been a comments formed upon what they read, or these comments only romantic or political in nature?" he questioned.
Worst case scenario
Meanwhile, Raja Abdul Aziz pronounced that a misfortune case unfolding for a LAMP was a blast of a pressurised boilers as well as leakages from a pipes supplying a acids.

He pro! nounced that a deviation could be easily detected if there were emissions.

"The slightest of my be concerned is radioactivity. It is a easiest thing to detect, so we can remove it as it is found," he said.

The anti-Lynas groups additionally claimed that a half-life of a thorium rubbish is fourteen billion years as well as a generation of a trickery used to store it, cannot last as prolonged as thorium.

NONERaja Abdul Aziz (right) pronounced that a rubbish will sojourn fast as well as won't evacuate any deviation before it reaches a half life, so there was no need to be concerned about it.

When asked about a cupboard preference to ask Lynas to boat a hot rubbish behind to Australia before any permit is given, he pronounced that won't start a preference taken by a board.

He pronounced that a AELB had already asked Lynas to provide an letter of endeavour to send a rubbish behind to Australia in sequence to obtain a TOL even before a cupboard finished a preference yesterday.

Speaking toMalay! siakini< /em>later, he pronounced that formed upon his understanding, a cupboard entirely endorsed a preference finished by a board - to ask Lynas to send a rubbish behind to Australia.

Leaking pipe

Raja Abdul Aziz additionally responded to a PKR allegations not long ago that a siren during Lamp was leaking.

He confirmed that which was loyal after conducting an investigation as well as combined that Lynas had already taken a necessary stairs to correct it.

He pronounced that a siren is part of a glow protection complement of a plant, as well as if Lynas unsuccessful to fix it, it would not get a relevant certificate regarding safety from a Malaysian Fire as well as Rescue Department.

Two weeks ago, PKR Kelana Jaya MP Loh Gwo-Burne suggested a leaked email purportedly from a Lynas ! contract or, that says that out of 19 'packages' of fibre-glass pipes, only five upheld muster. -Malaysiakini, 1/3/2011, Only 3% pronounced 'No' to Lynas during arrangement period

- Charles Hector
Read More @ Source



More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz

No comments: