Dear Editor,IT HAS just occurred to me which a Malaysia Agreement is already Null as well as Void. No need to wait for for a agreements to be over as well as no way to redress it. Can we remodel a Null as well as Void agreement? No, we can't!
What is missed is a statement in a Borneonisation. The difference is "when Sabahan have been qualified". How can Sabahan not competent to lead their departments after some-more than 10 years? Ridiculous, isn't it?
Let alone 47 years. Borneonisation should have been carried out inside of 10 years. More than is just unreasonable. If this failed to be carried out, afterwards a Agreements is null as well as void. Even though, Malaya were to honour a agreement by making all Federal Posts be given to Sabahans, right away a agreement remains Null as well as Void.
So there is no point in putting a no relinquishment clause. since there is not Malaysia Agreement, Sabah can direct to be eccentric any time now, notwithstanding all attempts to fulfill in full a rest of a agreements. One choice is to renegotiate a brand new Agreement though Agreement between subjugated partial of will never nullify a agreement prior to Sabah was colonised by Malaya.
One of these days, a couple of discontented group from Sabah will move this Malaysia Agreement to a universe justice as well as acknowledgement Sabah independent, like Kosovo. You can suppose what a decision which a World Court will take.
What is so important about Borneonisation? All a probl! ems whic h Sabah face have been due to a non-compliance of this partial of a Malaysia Agreement. The corruption, bootleg immigrants, destruction of fishing by bombings, crimes, drugs,gambling, human trafficking have been due to enforcement departments which have been not headed by Sabahan, though by Malayan who never cruise Sabah as Malaysia.
"After 47 years of being partial of Malaysia, Sabahans have not done any unnecessary final such as wanting a internal to be a yang diPertuan Agong or a Timbalan because this was not included in a agreement."
"If Sabahans continue to be denied (the rights guaranteed by a twenty points), afterwards how can a 1 Malaysia judgment of 'People first, performance now', be achieved as a clarification of a judgment is to safeguard which all Malaysians have been provided with opportunities irrespective of segment or state?".
"In a context of Sabah, a rights of a people have been contained in a twenty Point Agreement, which were agreed upon prior to a formation of Malaysia, if a decision-Makers do not assimilate or intentionally repudiate a contents of a agreement, afterwards this emanate will continue to be a source of dispute each time it is raised".
He pronounced a Federal Government should by right away assimilate because people in Sabah keep demanding which Sabahan head its departments in a State.
The bitter tablet for many Sabahans, he said, is which notwithstanding of a 20-Point Agreement obviously saying which a 'Borneonisation' of federal departments as well as agencies in Sabah should be done as shortly as possible, it had turn a broken promise.
The Sabahan polite ser! vants wo uld be familiar with a internal incident unlike officers who were eliminated from other places.
The common excuse which internal officers were still fresh compared to their counterparts from Peninsular Malaysia was no longer acceptable.
- Sabahkini
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment