So, no, do not contend if you have been not with us afterwards you have been conflicting us. That is a line borrowed from President Bush. Look during a bigger picture. It is not usually about kicking out Umno a domestic party. It is about convincing a uncommitted Malays which you have been not their enemy. Hence a arguments as to since you contingency opinion ABU contingency not give an sense which ABU (anything though Umno) is essentially ABM (anything though Malays).
NO HOLDS BARRED
Raja Petra Kamarudin
This was a summary you perceived from a crony who used to readMalaysia Todayregularly though right divided no longer bothers to visitMalaysia Today:
Brother, discuss it RPK either he is ABU as good as stick upon us to throw a BN out or he is with them. you discuss it you this story you can send to him.
My brother who studied in India made a regard which a Indians every day kick their cows as good as make them do back-breaking work. Then, upon a religious day, they deck them with beautiful flowers, lick them as good as ceremony them. Only upon which day.
When UMNO talks nice things about a Chinese as good as Indians as good as recalls how they help build a country, you know it is choosing time. After winning a elections, they go behind to violence their cows again. They have been called pendatangs as good as all sorts of unsav! oury nam es.
The critical indicate is which when reduce turn UMNO members insult a non-Malays, a tip leaders mount by sensitively as good as contend zero about a abuses.
In alternative words, they acquiesce to what was stated. They all agree upon insulting a non-Malays.
If a tip leaders do not give a sense of fairness to all a citizens, afterwards it is usually right which you throw them out in a ! election s.
We need to do this given it will pierce about leaders who have been fair to all a citizens, not racists.
Malaysia has never had a politician for a leader, with a possible difference of Tunku Abdul Rahman. So right divided it is remodel as good as Malaysia 1.
It is a same cow story again. Why do you need to elect them based upon promises which have never been kept for 50 years.
Why did they not show us a reforms earlier? Only now, when they have been in trouble? And you have been stupid sufficient to re-elect them.
Brother, discuss it RPK either he is ABU as good as stick upon us to throw a BN out or he is with them. you discuss it you this story you can send to him.
My brother who studied in India made a regard which a Indians every day kick their cows as good as make them do back-breaking work. Then, upon a religious day, they deck them with beautiful flowers, lick them as good as ceremony them. Only upon which day.
When UMNO talks nice things about a Chinese as good as Indians as good as recalls how they help build a country, you know it is choosing time. After winning a elections, they go behind to violence their cows again. They have been called pendatangs as good as all sorts of unsav! oury nam es.
The critical indicate is which when reduce turn UMNO members insult a non-Malays, a tip leaders mount by sensitively as good as contend zero about a abuses.
In alternative words, they acquiesce to what was stated. They all agree upon insulting a non-Malays.
If a tip leaders do not give a sense of fairness to all a citizens, afterwards it is usually right which you throw them out in a ! election s.
We need to do this given it will pierce about leaders who have been fair to all a citizens, not racists.
Malaysia has never had a politician for a leader, with a possible difference of Tunku Abdul Rahman. So right divided it is remodel as good as Malaysia 1.
It is a same cow story again. Why do you need to elect them based upon promises which have never been kept for 50 years.
Why did they not show us a reforms earlier? Only now, when they have been in trouble? And you have been stupid sufficient to re-elect them.
*************************************
Allow me to respond to this most engaging message. First of all: upon a actuality which a sender of this summary no longer visits or readsMalaysia Today.
Please demeanour during a census data below. During a March 2008 choosing duration as good as in a few months of a aftermath of a election,Malaysia Today's readership increased. Then, in September 2008, when you got incarcerated underneath a Internal Security Act, a readership declined, or rsther than it went behind to a normal pre-election figures. It has some-more or less remained consistent until today.
When you was underneath detention, most readers mislaid interest inMalaysia Today. Since you was behind bars, they no longer saw a need to review or 'support'Malaysia Today. Hence, a dump in readership was given you had been incarcerated as good as not for any alternative reason you can figure out.
It is, therefore, not an emanate with me which this person says he no longer visits or readsMalaysia Today. Most readers had already abandonedMalaysia Todayas soon as you got sent to a Kamunting apprehension centre.Malaysia Todaywas no longer applicable to most of these people a day you mislaid my freedom.
O f course, most roar about howMalaysia Todayhas 'betrayed' them. Maybe they did not stop to contemplate either you additionally felt betr! ayed. Th e supervision too realised thatMalaysia Today's readership declined once they incarcerated me. This convinced a supervision which a pierce to detain me was a scold decision. And this made a supervision even some-more dynamic to keep me in Kamunting, so thatMalaysia Todaycould be neutralised. And when a high justice ruled my apprehension illegal as good as ordered my release, a supervision fought tooth as good as nail to try to get me behind in to Kamunting, ensuing in me having to leave a country to equivocate a third apprehension underneath a ISA.
My wife's contention is which if a readership had been confirmed or had even increased, afterwards ! a gove rnment would have come to a conclusion which detaining me was fatuous as good as they competence as good usually let me go. Instead, a success in pulling downMalaysia Today's readership by detaining me meant which my predestine had been sealed. There was no approach a supervision would allow me to sojourn free.
And a actuality which a readership never went behind up even after you had been expelled valid which a government's strategy of detaining me was correct. They wanted to silence me as good as this design had been met. With less people readingMalaysia Todaythey had, in a way, silenced me.
On a subsequent indicate in which message: "Brother, discuss it RPK either he is ABU as good as stick upon us to throw a BN out or he is with them."
This reminds me of President Bush's "either you have been with us or you have been conflicting us" statement. That was how President Bush coerced a alternative nations in to supporting America's invasion of Iraq upon a excuse which Iraq had WMDs. Later, of course, this was proven to be a lie. They usually raised a emanate of a WMDs as an excuse to attack Iraq. And they have been right divided articulate about attacking Iran upon a same excuse, additionally with a "either you have been with us or you have been conflicting u! s" slo gan.
This brings! me to a Muslim fundamentalists', or extremists' if you wish, didactic discourse which if you have been not Muslim afterwards you arekafir(infidel). And if you arekafirthen you have been automatically an rivalry of Islam as good as no Muslim contingency take akafiras a crony or companion.
This is, again, an "either you have been with us or you have been conflicting us" doctrine. And to be with us you contingency turn a Muslim or modify to Islam. To 'reject' Islam equates to you have been an rivalry of Islam as good as war can be declared upon you to pierce you to a right path.
The some-more magnanimous Muslims would reject this doctrine. Even if you have been not a Muslim does not meant you have been an rivalry of Islam. You do not need to be a Muslim, Jew, Christian, Hindu, Buddhist or whatever. This is, after al! l, mere labelling. What is critical isnilai-nilai Islamor Islamic values. The cloak of Islam equates to zero though a spirit of Islam.
And a spirit of Islam is justice, fair play, equality, transparency, corruption-free, persecution-free, tolerance, moderation, etc. These have been a values you have been ostensible to urge as good as uphold, not a labelling of someone as being Muslim orkafir-- as good as which if you arekafirthen you have been a declared rivalry of Islam.
The days when "if you have been not of my competition or conviction afterwards you contingency be killed" have been prolonged gone. That was what they did most hundreds of years ago. And which is since you oppose regimes which still practice policies such as "if you have been not Malay afterwards you have been an rivalry of a Malays" as good as "if you have been not Muslim t! hen you have been an rivalry of Islam who wishes to trick Muslims to turn Christians" as good as "if you have been not Malay afterwards you arependatang(immigrant) who contingency be treated with colour as a second-class citizen" as good as so on.
Now, let us ta! lk about ABU (anything though Umno). Yes, you await ABU. But let us not be confused about a genuine meaning of ABU. We have been not articulate about ABU merely in a context of Umno a domestic party. We have been articulate about ABU in a context of an institutionalised Umno culture.
Forget about Umno a domestic party. That is merely a registered organisation or domestic party. All you need to do is to deregister Umno (like they did in 1987/1988) as good as Umno will rught divided no longer exist.
But will Umno, a institutionalised culture, die as good if Umno 'dies'? When they deregistered Umno a Umno enlightenment did not die. It continued as good as merely got superimposed onto a brand new Umno (Umno Baru). It was similar to a bug which merely leaped onto a brand new animal once a host died. The bug does not die.
We have been not out to merely defeat Umno a domestic celebration in an election. We want to eradicate a institutionalised Umno culture. The Umno enlightenment is in a polite service, a military, a troops force, a judiciary, a Elections Commission (SPR), as good as everywhere. It is in MCA, MIC, Gerakan, PPP as good as all a alternative component members of Barisan Nasional. They consider as good as do things similar to Umno. They have been all extensions of Umno.
Until today, even after twenty-two years (since 1990), a Umno enlightenment is still really clever in Kelantan. The polite use is Umno. The people in a ka! mpongs a re Umno. PAS might have been ruling Kelantan for twenty-two years, though they have unsuccessful to get absolved of a Umno enlightenment from all levels of a polite use as good as society.
PAS kicked out Umno from Kelantan twenty-two years ago. But Menteri Besar Nik Aziz Nik Mat will discuss it you they can't appear to scratch divided theUmno karat(the Umno rust).
Sure, as prolonged as Nik Aziz stays a Menteri Besar, afterwards PAS can go upon ruling Kelantan. Even someUmno karatsupport Nik Aziz. But which await is per! sonal to holder. They await Nik Aziz, not PAS. And once Nik Aziz dies, as you all will one day, there is no guarantee which PAS can retain Kelantan. In fact, even right divided Kelantanese have been not certain either Nik Aziz will still be alive by a 14th ubiquitous choosing -- so they have been considering either in a subsequent ubiquitous choosing (the 13th ubiquitous election) they should give a state behind to Umno.
So, yes, you am ABU. But you am not usually ABU a domestic celebration called Umno. you am ABU a institutionalised UMNO culture. Umno can die. But if Umno a institutionalised enlightenment remains, afterwards it matters not either you do or do not have Umno as a government.
Look during Perak. Granted it was given a ! Pakatan Rakyat state assemblypersons altered sides which a state fell behind to Barisan Nasional. But which alone was not enough. If was given a state secretary was Umno (hence he sealed up Nizar Jamaluddin's bureau as good as called in a police) as good as a Sultan was Umno (hence he swore in a brand new supervision even if a constitution might not have authorised that) as good as so on. It was an complete machine of Umno which included a police, state polite service, palace, judiciary, SPR, etc., which authorised Perak to fall.
See what happened in Selangor with regards to a pass positions in a state administration. It was all finished conflicting a wishes of Pakatan Rakyat as good as it was, again, all Umno. So you have a Pakatan Rakyat state supervision with an Umno administration. If in twenty-two years they could not eradicate Umno from Kelantan, how prolonged do you consider this will go upon in Selangor? you would contend forever.
So stop being narrow minded. We need to demeanour during ABU from a most wider perspective. Sure, you am ABU. But you am a conflicting form of ABU. you am not ABU a domestic celebration called Umno. you am ABU a complete institutionalised Umno culture. But may be this is too complicating for simple-minded people to und! erstand.
Now, per a rest of a points in a message. The bard has listed down all a reasons of his grievances with a present government. you can sum up everything he pronounced in usually one sentence: racism as good as a astray treatment of non-Malays. Hence, he argues, which is since you need to opinion ABU.
However, what was highlighted is not a means of a mildew though a symptoms of a disease. You can't heal a symptoms of a disease. You need to treat a means of a disease.
Will kicking out Umno heal a disease? It will not. Kicking out Umno is a temporary solution. Umno was kicked out from Kelantan twenty-two years ago. But a Umno enlightenment still remains. And during anytime Umno can re-emerge in Kelantan as good as this time with a vengeance.
It is similar to a cancer which is not fully cured. It usually gives an impress! ion it i s cured. But during any time it can come behind and, when it does, this time it will be really infamous as good as revengeful as good as really fast it will do a worse. Most people worry about a cancer coming behind after being marinated a first time around. It is when it comes behind which a patient normally dies.
The Umno cancer in Kelantan is still there, even after twenty-two years. It has not been fully cured. This is given a Umno cancer is not usually in Umno a domestic party. It is everywhere, in particular in a polite service, police, military, judiciary, villages, SPR, etc., all bent upon making certain which Umno a domestic celebration returns to take power in Kelantan.
Ask Nizar since Perak fell. Was it given a 3 Pakatanwakil rakyatsjumped ship or given a polite use as good as house all worked conflicting a opposition? Ask Khalid Ibrahim since he faces critical obstacles in Selangor. Is it not given a conduct as good as a body pierce in conflicting directions? Ask Nik Aziz either PAS really has carry out of Kelantan or is theUmno karatstill really clever in a state polite service.
No, kicking out Umno a ! domestic celebration is not enough. Without a disbelief a await of a Malay Diaspor! a is ver y crucial. Unless Pakatan as good as people such as a bard of a summary above can convince a Malays which ABU is not an anti-Malay movement, ABU is not starting to get far-reaching Malay support.
The bard of a summary has listed down all his grievances with Umno. And it is all about racism. The points have been really valid, of course. you am not saying they have been not. But try seeking during things from thekacamata(eyes) of a Malays. Don't you consider which by arguing such you have been creating an sense which ABU is about stealing a domestic power of a Malays? And is this a sense you want to create? And will this get a await of a Malays in a kampongs, polite service, police, military, judiciary, SPR as good as so on?
So, no, do not contend if you have been not with us afterwards you have been conflicting us. That is a line borrowed from President Bush. Look during a bigger picture. It is not usually about kicking out Umno a domestic party. It is about convincing a uncommitted Malays which you have been not their enemy. Hence a arguments as to since you contingency opinion ABU contingency not give an sense which ABU (anything though Umno) is essentially ABM (anything though Malays).
No, you am not a racist. you am not a Malay supremacist. How can you be with a Welsh mom as good as a Chinese/Siamese wife? you am a realist. And a being is: domestic power is in a hands of a Malays as good as a Malay infancy seats far outnumber a 'mixed' seats and, though Malay support, Pakatan Rakyat is not starting to form a subsequent sovereign government.
Read More @ Source Please demeanour during a census data below. During a March 2008 choosing duration as good as in a few months of a aftermath of a election,Malaysia Today's readership increased. Then, in September 2008, when you got incarcerated underneath a Internal Security Act, a readership declined, or rsther than it went behind to a normal pre-election figures. It has some-more or less remained consistent until today.
When you was underneath detention, most readers mislaid interest inMalaysia Today. Since you was behind bars, they no longer saw a need to review or 'support'Malaysia Today. Hence, a dump in readership was given you had been incarcerated as good as not for any alternative reason you can figure out.
It is, therefore, not an emanate with me which this person says he no longer visits or readsMalaysia Today. Most readers had already abandonedMalaysia Todayas soon as you got sent to a Kamunting apprehension centre.Malaysia Todaywas no longer applicable to most of these people a day you mislaid my freedom.
O f course, most roar about howMalaysia Todayhas 'betrayed' them. Maybe they did not stop to contemplate either you additionally felt betr! ayed. Th e supervision too realised thatMalaysia Today's readership declined once they incarcerated me. This convinced a supervision which a pierce to detain me was a scold decision. And this made a supervision even some-more dynamic to keep me in Kamunting, so thatMalaysia Todaycould be neutralised. And when a high justice ruled my apprehension illegal as good as ordered my release, a supervision fought tooth as good as nail to try to get me behind in to Kamunting, ensuing in me having to leave a country to equivocate a third apprehension underneath a ISA.
My wife's contention is which if a readership had been confirmed or had even increased, afterwards ! a gove rnment would have come to a conclusion which detaining me was fatuous as good as they competence as good usually let me go. Instead, a success in pulling downMalaysia Today's readership by detaining me meant which my predestine had been sealed. There was no approach a supervision would allow me to sojourn free.
And a actuality which a readership never went behind up even after you had been expelled valid which a government's strategy of detaining me was correct. They wanted to silence me as good as this design had been met. With less people readingMalaysia Todaythey had, in a way, silenced me.
On a subsequent indicate in which message: "Brother, discuss it RPK either he is ABU as good as stick upon us to throw a BN out or he is with them."
This reminds me of President Bush's "either you have been with us or you have been conflicting us" statement. That was how President Bush coerced a alternative nations in to supporting America's invasion of Iraq upon a excuse which Iraq had WMDs. Later, of course, this was proven to be a lie. They usually raised a emanate of a WMDs as an excuse to attack Iraq. And they have been right divided articulate about attacking Iran upon a same excuse, additionally with a "either you have been with us or you have been conflicting u! s" slo gan.
This brings! me to a Muslim fundamentalists', or extremists' if you wish, didactic discourse which if you have been not Muslim afterwards you arekafir(infidel). And if you arekafirthen you have been automatically an rivalry of Islam as good as no Muslim contingency take akafiras a crony or companion.
This is, again, an "either you have been with us or you have been conflicting us" doctrine. And to be with us you contingency turn a Muslim or modify to Islam. To 'reject' Islam equates to you have been an rivalry of Islam as good as war can be declared upon you to pierce you to a right path.
The some-more magnanimous Muslims would reject this doctrine. Even if you have been not a Muslim does not meant you have been an rivalry of Islam. You do not need to be a Muslim, Jew, Christian, Hindu, Buddhist or whatever. This is, after al! l, mere labelling. What is critical isnilai-nilai Islamor Islamic values. The cloak of Islam equates to zero though a spirit of Islam.
And a spirit of Islam is justice, fair play, equality, transparency, corruption-free, persecution-free, tolerance, moderation, etc. These have been a values you have been ostensible to urge as good as uphold, not a labelling of someone as being Muslim orkafir-- as good as which if you arekafirthen you have been a declared rivalry of Islam.
The days when "if you have been not of my competition or conviction afterwards you contingency be killed" have been prolonged gone. That was what they did most hundreds of years ago. And which is since you oppose regimes which still practice policies such as "if you have been not Malay afterwards you have been an rivalry of a Malays" as good as "if you have been not Muslim t! hen you have been an rivalry of Islam who wishes to trick Muslims to turn Christians" as good as "if you have been not Malay afterwards you arependatang(immigrant) who contingency be treated with colour as a second-class citizen" as good as so on.
Now, let us ta! lk about ABU (anything though Umno). Yes, you await ABU. But let us not be confused about a genuine meaning of ABU. We have been not articulate about ABU merely in a context of Umno a domestic party. We have been articulate about ABU in a context of an institutionalised Umno culture.
Forget about Umno a domestic party. That is merely a registered organisation or domestic party. All you need to do is to deregister Umno (like they did in 1987/1988) as good as Umno will rught divided no longer exist.
But will Umno, a institutionalised culture, die as good if Umno 'dies'? When they deregistered Umno a Umno enlightenment did not die. It continued as good as merely got superimposed onto a brand new Umno (Umno Baru). It was similar to a bug which merely leaped onto a brand new animal once a host died. The bug does not die.
We have been not out to merely defeat Umno a domestic celebration in an election. We want to eradicate a institutionalised Umno culture. The Umno enlightenment is in a polite service, a military, a troops force, a judiciary, a Elections Commission (SPR), as good as everywhere. It is in MCA, MIC, Gerakan, PPP as good as all a alternative component members of Barisan Nasional. They consider as good as do things similar to Umno. They have been all extensions of Umno.
Until today, even after twenty-two years (since 1990), a Umno enlightenment is still really clever in Kelantan. The polite use is Umno. The people in a ka! mpongs a re Umno. PAS might have been ruling Kelantan for twenty-two years, though they have unsuccessful to get absolved of a Umno enlightenment from all levels of a polite use as good as society.
PAS kicked out Umno from Kelantan twenty-two years ago. But Menteri Besar Nik Aziz Nik Mat will discuss it you they can't appear to scratch divided theUmno karat(the Umno rust).
Sure, as prolonged as Nik Aziz stays a Menteri Besar, afterwards PAS can go upon ruling Kelantan. Even someUmno karatsupport Nik Aziz. But which await is per! sonal to holder. They await Nik Aziz, not PAS. And once Nik Aziz dies, as you all will one day, there is no guarantee which PAS can retain Kelantan. In fact, even right divided Kelantanese have been not certain either Nik Aziz will still be alive by a 14th ubiquitous choosing -- so they have been considering either in a subsequent ubiquitous choosing (the 13th ubiquitous election) they should give a state behind to Umno.
So, yes, you am ABU. But you am not usually ABU a domestic celebration called Umno. you am ABU a institutionalised UMNO culture. Umno can die. But if Umno a institutionalised enlightenment remains, afterwards it matters not either you do or do not have Umno as a government.
Look during Perak. Granted it was given a ! Pakatan Rakyat state assemblypersons altered sides which a state fell behind to Barisan Nasional. But which alone was not enough. If was given a state secretary was Umno (hence he sealed up Nizar Jamaluddin's bureau as good as called in a police) as good as a Sultan was Umno (hence he swore in a brand new supervision even if a constitution might not have authorised that) as good as so on. It was an complete machine of Umno which included a police, state polite service, palace, judiciary, SPR, etc., which authorised Perak to fall.
See what happened in Selangor with regards to a pass positions in a state administration. It was all finished conflicting a wishes of Pakatan Rakyat as good as it was, again, all Umno. So you have a Pakatan Rakyat state supervision with an Umno administration. If in twenty-two years they could not eradicate Umno from Kelantan, how prolonged do you consider this will go upon in Selangor? you would contend forever.
So stop being narrow minded. We need to demeanour during ABU from a most wider perspective. Sure, you am ABU. But you am a conflicting form of ABU. you am not ABU a domestic celebration called Umno. you am ABU a complete institutionalised Umno culture. But may be this is too complicating for simple-minded people to und! erstand.
Now, per a rest of a points in a message. The bard has listed down all a reasons of his grievances with a present government. you can sum up everything he pronounced in usually one sentence: racism as good as a astray treatment of non-Malays. Hence, he argues, which is since you need to opinion ABU.
However, what was highlighted is not a means of a mildew though a symptoms of a disease. You can't heal a symptoms of a disease. You need to treat a means of a disease.
Will kicking out Umno heal a disease? It will not. Kicking out Umno is a temporary solution. Umno was kicked out from Kelantan twenty-two years ago. But a Umno enlightenment still remains. And during anytime Umno can re-emerge in Kelantan as good as this time with a vengeance.
It is similar to a cancer which is not fully cured. It usually gives an impress! ion it i s cured. But during any time it can come behind and, when it does, this time it will be really infamous as good as revengeful as good as really fast it will do a worse. Most people worry about a cancer coming behind after being marinated a first time around. It is when it comes behind which a patient normally dies.
The Umno cancer in Kelantan is still there, even after twenty-two years. It has not been fully cured. This is given a Umno cancer is not usually in Umno a domestic party. It is everywhere, in particular in a polite service, police, military, judiciary, villages, SPR, etc., all bent upon making certain which Umno a domestic celebration returns to take power in Kelantan.
Ask Nizar since Perak fell. Was it given a 3 Pakatanwakil rakyatsjumped ship or given a polite use as good as house all worked conflicting a opposition? Ask Khalid Ibrahim since he faces critical obstacles in Selangor. Is it not given a conduct as good as a body pierce in conflicting directions? Ask Nik Aziz either PAS really has carry out of Kelantan or is theUmno karatstill really clever in a state polite service.
No, kicking out Umno a ! domestic celebration is not enough. Without a disbelief a await of a Malay Diaspor! a is ver y crucial. Unless Pakatan as good as people such as a bard of a summary above can convince a Malays which ABU is not an anti-Malay movement, ABU is not starting to get far-reaching Malay support.
The bard of a summary has listed down all his grievances with Umno. And it is all about racism. The points have been really valid, of course. you am not saying they have been not. But try seeking during things from thekacamata(eyes) of a Malays. Don't you consider which by arguing such you have been creating an sense which ABU is about stealing a domestic power of a Malays? And is this a sense you want to create? And will this get a await of a Malays in a kampongs, polite service, police, military, judiciary, SPR as good as so on?
So, no, do not contend if you have been not with us afterwards you have been conflicting us. That is a line borrowed from President Bush. Look during a bigger picture. It is not usually about kicking out Umno a domestic party. It is about convincing a uncommitted Malays which you have been not their enemy. Hence a arguments as to since you contingency opinion ABU contingency not give an sense which ABU (anything though Umno) is essentially ABM (anything though Malays).
No, you am not a racist. you am not a Malay supremacist. How can you be with a Welsh mom as good as a Chinese/Siamese wife? you am a realist. And a being is: domestic power is in a hands of a Malays as good as a Malay infancy seats far outnumber a 'mixed' seats and, though Malay support, Pakatan Rakyat is not starting to form a subsequent sovereign government.
More Bar! isan Nas ional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment