RPK & Haris Ibrahim - the great partnership in the newly formed MCLM though which future right divided holds the big question mark!
The Malaysian Insider(TMI) articleMCLM boss quits, says undermined by RPKreported which Haris Ibrahim tendered his abdication as boss of the MCLM, after citing as reasons for his decision dual of RPK's recent as well as really ban interviews see my previous postRPK amputates 'gangrenous' Anwar Ibrahim from Pakatan?
Brother Haris resigned as MCLM's boss because he has been terribly upset by RPK's:
(1) uneven avowal (meaning minus before to consultation & agreement with Haris & alternative MCLM bureau holders) thatThe Rights organisation (MCLM) is not the 3rd forceand therefore would not competition the subsequent ubiquitous election, and
(2) remarks that'the Egypt-style people's series was not an answer for Malaysia due to the ethereal secular balance'because according to RPK,"they (Chinese voters) do not wish Tahrir Square sort of change", saddening Haris because according to him"... my friend (Raja Petra) should continue to see us as Malays, Chinese, Indians, dll (others)."
The overall effect, according to Haris, has fundamentally put the tool in his (Haris') ABU campaign.
I lament the end of the great RPK-Haris Ibrahim partnership in MCLM, the transformation to foster great parliamentarians as well as parliamentary practice of initial category Westminster-type democracy.
But is there any hope of salvaging the attribute as well as the procedure of MCLM?
Before we comment upon that, let me provide my personal take upon the dual protagonists.
Let me begin with RPK.
I came to knowof(rather than 'k! now' per se) RPK in 2005 when I, shabby really most by Jeff Ooi's blogging, started blogging underneath the mentorship of my erstwhile partner, Mr X, at theBolehTalkblog.
Then, after we posted the square vicious of Anwar Ibrahim, most to the consternation of my partner as well as friends wakakaka, RPK contacted me by email with the short summary which we replied with pleasantness as well as kept the contents trusted for the last 7 years. Thereafter we have had no further person-to-person contact.
Out of apply oneself for confidentiality, as should be celebrated in any in isolation correspondence, we have no goal of ever revealing which message.
As we had created before, asocial kaytee hasn't been as well as isn't only the bloke known to be quite fond of RPK privately (I provide him with clinical neutrality), though of march we do admire, apply oneself as well as am the diminutive envious of his creativity as well as capability to influence many politically.
But we do not regularly determine with his arguments, for example, those relating to his inflammatory Stat Dec as well as his take upon Ombudsman. I've created several posts to remonstrate with the former see my postRPK the peaceful serf in his orthodox declarationand ...
... shot him down upon the latter when someday rught divided after the March 2008 GE, he wrote about instituting an ombudsman (or committee) for the then 5 States underneath the DAP-PKR-PAS governments. But what took my exhale divided was his over-the-top offer when he settled (for some obscure reasons):
"The Ombudsman must be upon top of the Chief Minister as well as Menteri Besar. It must have the power as well as government to serve even the highest male in the st! ate to c ome before to the cabinet for doubt upon anything at all which might be viewed as wrongdoing, transgressions, deviations, etc. And the Ombudsman must have the power as well as government to suggest the dismissal of any open servant or politician who might have committed the breach of discipline, even if he is the Chief Minister/Menteri Besar."
I was totally astounded by his remarks of"... upon top of the Chief Minister as well as Menteri Besar ..."and the accompanying power-this as well as power-that for the due ombudsman.
I then wrote:This is starting too far, putting anunelectedperson upon top of theelected member of the people!
Mind, this seems to be the common problem suffered spasmodic by really schooled people, both in BN as well as Pakatan, where I'm some-more vicious of the latter who promoted as well as supported frog-ology, yes, even the DAP sweetie similar to Hannah Yeo who broke my heart when she wrote in defence of Mrman male lai's916 attempted though failedcoup d'tat.
I wrote which having an Ombudsman establishmenta laRPK's offer would not be unlike instituting the structure of the Iranian government, where theunelectedclerical Supreme Leader as well as the Assembly of Elders in Iran can overrule decisions as well as policies of the! elect edPresident as well as the Majles (Parliament).
In my post we left the summary for RPK to'keep my ombudsman beef medium rare please'so as not to overcook the new (Ombudsman) dish by creation him/her into the pseudo-Ayatollah with supra-constitutional powers over the people's democratically elected member for some-more read my postPost choosing snippets (1).
Now we ! know why Karpal Singh is my spiritual leader in politics.
To summarize upon RPK, we apply oneself as well as admire him, though would accept his arguments only after we have privately analyzed their merits, unlike those who gushingly called him'The Great RPK'or even fawningly'yang sangat mulia'wakakaka when he sang songs they desired to hear, though alas, denigrated him as a'turncoat, traitor, "Pakatan Rakyat" paid bum, etc'when he didn't.
As for Brother Haris Ibrahim, what can we say about this smashing man, alternative than he is the frank socio-political romantic who's brave, dedicated, self-sacrificing as well as straight articulate so straight which people could make use of his impression to regulate rulers.
Do we comprehend which we once disliked him wakakaka, most to the trouble of my blogging matey, Lucia Lai ofMental Jogblog. Then the single day, Haris wrote the square titledJambuism, as well as in which process, indirectly suggested to me his unique character, as epitomised by his notice of God.
As we wrote in my responseOmnia Vincit Jambuism:
Strangely (or should it be) for an non-believer we find God's settlement as presented by Ha! ris real ly touching. If there is the God ;-), surely Haris' version has to be the loyal the single - One who is kind, just, loving, compassionate, humorous, as well as really One confidently upon top of silly (human projected) sparse nonsensical jealousy.
I am reminded of the quote by the single of the Hindu Trinity, Krishna who said"Whoever we urge to, it is we ! who will answer".
But the story ofJambuismalso tells me the little about the author, as well as we right divided look at him differently. Yes, we right divided similar to him ;-)
Okay, right divided we know how my bones (for those two) would fall, though having pronounced all these, my perspective upon Brother Haris' complaints against RPK turns out to be the 50:50 split, as follows:
I await Haris in which RPK should not have arbitrarily decided upon MCLM's behalf (that it won't competition in the entrance GE) but before to consultation with Haris as well as alternative MCLM bureau bearers. In this, RPK has been arrogant as well as insensitive in ignoring which the boss of MCLM possesses the right as well as pleasantness to be consulted before to to such critical open announcement.
However, upon the second pointvis--visRPK's remarks that'the Egypt-style people's series was not an answer for Malaysia due to the ethereal secular balance'and that"... (Chinese voters) do not wish Tahrir Square sort of change", we await RPK.
Much as Brother Haris might be essay for the maudlin non-ethnic approach. as well as we truly admire him for this, we reckon RPK has been picturesque in saying an critical truth, which (reading beyond his straightforward statement of the 'delicate secular balance') the Malays, as well as not only "Pakatan Rakyat" Malays, have been unlikely to accept anyTahrir Squaretype of revolutionary protests, in any case o! f the wo rthiness of the means or even if PAS or Anwar Ibrahim organizes them, if they believe or have been made to believe the Chinese have been at the back of the revolt against the BN government.
And we know "Pakatan Rakyat" will benefaction it as the aroused Chinese (throw in the com! munist f or great measure)coup d'tatto overthrow as well as remove the Malays' sacred cow (removed the la NFC's management?wakakaka), namely theiragama, raja dan bangsa.
Haven't various "Pakatan Rakyat" people (including big names) already as well as repetitively primed the heartland upon this 'threat', of the Chinese intensity as well as target to take over the country (and instal the Christian PM), inconceivable as the odds might be?
Recalling my question:But is there any hope to salvage the RPK-Haris Ibrahim relationship?
The ball lies in RPK's court, to swallow ones pride to Haris for not consulting him upon saying MCLM will not field the candidate in GE-13.
The Malaysian Insider(TMI) articleMCLM boss quits, says undermined by RPKreported which Haris Ibrahim tendered his abdication as boss of the MCLM, after citing as reasons for his decision dual of RPK's recent as well as really ban interviews see my previous postRPK amputates 'gangrenous' Anwar Ibrahim from Pakatan?
Brother Haris resigned as MCLM's boss because he has been terribly upset by RPK's:
(1) uneven avowal (meaning minus before to consultation & agreement with Haris & alternative MCLM bureau holders) thatThe Rights organisation (MCLM) is not the 3rd forceand therefore would not competition the subsequent ubiquitous election, and
(2) remarks that'the Egypt-style people's series was not an answer for Malaysia due to the ethereal secular balance'because according to RPK,"they (Chinese voters) do not wish Tahrir Square sort of change", saddening Haris because according to him"... my friend (Raja Petra) should continue to see us as Malays, Chinese, Indians, dll (others)."
The overall effect, according to Haris, has fundamentally put the tool in his (Haris') ABU campaign.
I lament the end of the great RPK-Haris Ibrahim partnership in MCLM, the transformation to foster great parliamentarians as well as parliamentary practice of initial category Westminster-type democracy.
But is there any hope of salvaging the attribute as well as the procedure of MCLM?
Before we comment upon that, let me provide my personal take upon the dual protagonists.
Let me begin with RPK.
I came to knowof(rather than 'k! now' per se) RPK in 2005 when I, shabby really most by Jeff Ooi's blogging, started blogging underneath the mentorship of my erstwhile partner, Mr X, at theBolehTalkblog.
Then, after we posted the square vicious of Anwar Ibrahim, most to the consternation of my partner as well as friends wakakaka, RPK contacted me by email with the short summary which we replied with pleasantness as well as kept the contents trusted for the last 7 years. Thereafter we have had no further person-to-person contact.
Out of apply oneself for confidentiality, as should be celebrated in any in isolation correspondence, we have no goal of ever revealing which message.
As we had created before, asocial kaytee hasn't been as well as isn't only the bloke known to be quite fond of RPK privately (I provide him with clinical neutrality), though of march we do admire, apply oneself as well as am the diminutive envious of his creativity as well as capability to influence many politically.
But we do not regularly determine with his arguments, for example, those relating to his inflammatory Stat Dec as well as his take upon Ombudsman. I've created several posts to remonstrate with the former see my postRPK the peaceful serf in his orthodox declarationand ...
... shot him down upon the latter when someday rught divided after the March 2008 GE, he wrote about instituting an ombudsman (or committee) for the then 5 States underneath the DAP-PKR-PAS governments. But what took my exhale divided was his over-the-top offer when he settled (for some obscure reasons):
"The Ombudsman must be upon top of the Chief Minister as well as Menteri Besar. It must have the power as well as government to serve even the highest male in the st! ate to c ome before to the cabinet for doubt upon anything at all which might be viewed as wrongdoing, transgressions, deviations, etc. And the Ombudsman must have the power as well as government to suggest the dismissal of any open servant or politician who might have committed the breach of discipline, even if he is the Chief Minister/Menteri Besar."
I was totally astounded by his remarks of"... upon top of the Chief Minister as well as Menteri Besar ..."and the accompanying power-this as well as power-that for the due ombudsman.
I then wrote:This is starting too far, putting anunelectedperson upon top of theelected member of the people!
Mind, this seems to be the common problem suffered spasmodic by really schooled people, both in BN as well as Pakatan, where I'm some-more vicious of the latter who promoted as well as supported frog-ology, yes, even the DAP sweetie similar to Hannah Yeo who broke my heart when she wrote in defence of Mrman male lai's916 attempted though failedcoup d'tat.
I wrote which having an Ombudsman establishmenta laRPK's offer would not be unlike instituting the structure of the Iranian government, where theunelectedclerical Supreme Leader as well as the Assembly of Elders in Iran can overrule decisions as well as policies of the! elect edPresident as well as the Majles (Parliament).
In my post we left the summary for RPK to'keep my ombudsman beef medium rare please'so as not to overcook the new (Ombudsman) dish by creation him/her into the pseudo-Ayatollah with supra-constitutional powers over the people's democratically elected member for some-more read my postPost choosing snippets (1).
Now we ! know why Karpal Singh is my spiritual leader in politics.
To summarize upon RPK, we apply oneself as well as admire him, though would accept his arguments only after we have privately analyzed their merits, unlike those who gushingly called him'The Great RPK'or even fawningly'yang sangat mulia'wakakaka when he sang songs they desired to hear, though alas, denigrated him as a'turncoat, traitor, "Pakatan Rakyat" paid bum, etc'when he didn't.
As for Brother Haris Ibrahim, what can we say about this smashing man, alternative than he is the frank socio-political romantic who's brave, dedicated, self-sacrificing as well as straight articulate so straight which people could make use of his impression to regulate rulers.
Do we comprehend which we once disliked him wakakaka, most to the trouble of my blogging matey, Lucia Lai ofMental Jogblog. Then the single day, Haris wrote the square titledJambuism, as well as in which process, indirectly suggested to me his unique character, as epitomised by his notice of God.
As we wrote in my responseOmnia Vincit Jambuism:
Strangely (or should it be) for an non-believer we find God's settlement as presented by Ha! ris real ly touching. If there is the God ;-), surely Haris' version has to be the loyal the single - One who is kind, just, loving, compassionate, humorous, as well as really One confidently upon top of silly (human projected) sparse nonsensical jealousy.
I am reminded of the quote by the single of the Hindu Trinity, Krishna who said"Whoever we urge to, it is we ! who will answer".
But the story ofJambuismalso tells me the little about the author, as well as we right divided look at him differently. Yes, we right divided similar to him ;-)
Okay, right divided we know how my bones (for those two) would fall, though having pronounced all these, my perspective upon Brother Haris' complaints against RPK turns out to be the 50:50 split, as follows:
I await Haris in which RPK should not have arbitrarily decided upon MCLM's behalf (that it won't competition in the entrance GE) but before to consultation with Haris as well as alternative MCLM bureau bearers. In this, RPK has been arrogant as well as insensitive in ignoring which the boss of MCLM possesses the right as well as pleasantness to be consulted before to to such critical open announcement.
However, upon the second pointvis--visRPK's remarks that'the Egypt-style people's series was not an answer for Malaysia due to the ethereal secular balance'and that"... (Chinese voters) do not wish Tahrir Square sort of change", we await RPK.
Much as Brother Haris might be essay for the maudlin non-ethnic approach. as well as we truly admire him for this, we reckon RPK has been picturesque in saying an critical truth, which (reading beyond his straightforward statement of the 'delicate secular balance') the Malays, as well as not only "Pakatan Rakyat" Malays, have been unlikely to accept anyTahrir Squaretype of revolutionary protests, in any case o! f the wo rthiness of the means or even if PAS or Anwar Ibrahim organizes them, if they believe or have been made to believe the Chinese have been at the back of the revolt against the BN government.
And we know "Pakatan Rakyat" will benefaction it as the aroused Chinese (throw in the com! munist f or great measure)coup d'tatto overthrow as well as remove the Malays' sacred cow (removed the la NFC's management?wakakaka), namely theiragama, raja dan bangsa.
Haven't various "Pakatan Rakyat" people (including big names) already as well as repetitively primed the heartland upon this 'threat', of the Chinese intensity as well as target to take over the country (and instal the Christian PM), inconceivable as the odds might be?
Recalling my question:But is there any hope to salvage the RPK-Haris Ibrahim relationship?
The ball lies in RPK's court, to swallow ones pride to Haris for not consulting him upon saying MCLM will not field the candidate in GE-13.
POSTED BY KTEMOC
Read More @ Source 20111126-HALIM HASAN-BERILMU SEBELUM BERAMAL
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment