Kill the Bill: Defend our constitutional right and reject the Peaceful Assembly Bill


Kill a Bill: Defend a constitutional right as well as reject a Peaceful Assembly Bill
We, Killthebill.org, part of a Kempen Kebebasan Berhimpun (KKB) represents many Malaysians from all walks of hold up who have come together to oppose a Peaceful Assembly Bill (PAB), titillate all a 70members of Dewan Negara to put t! he Feder al Contitutions as well as open seductiveness prior to narrow-minded seductiveness as well as reject a bill. N a past four weeks hundreds have stick upon a creative criticism instituted as well as pioneered by KillTheBill.org in criticism of PAB. By rejecting a bill, Dewan Negara can force a Executive to examination a check as well as avoid a annoyance of a check that is not enforceable.
We titillate a Senators to consider a four constrained reasons prior to speaking up upon a bill.
Firstly, a Bill was drafted though meaningful as well as thorough open consultation. The proof of a pudding is in a eating. That a Bill has triggered overwhelming open snub when a check is, meant to be 'revolutionary' as well as ' hulk leap' speaks volume of a quality. The check was so ill-prepared that a Prime Minister had to distance himself from a legislative routine as well as indoctrinate 6 amendments. Unfortunately, a flaws have been copiousness as well as cannot be mitigated with just a amendments introduced in a Dewan Rakyat.
Second! ly, a Bill does not meet general standards in regulating open assemblies notwithstanding a Government's explain to have consulted legislations as well as legal experts from alternative countries. The general most appropriate practices aims to facilitate as well as not to obstruct! open as semblies, possibly they have been static, in suit or spontaneous. In general usually assemblies in suit (street rallies) have been required to surprise a authorities in allege for a role of trade control. This notice duration can even be shortened for extemporaneous assemblies in response to disruptive development, such as allege of a country by another. However, in Malaysia, assemblies in suit (street rallies) have been undisguised taboo whilst unreasonable restrictions have been placed upon venue as well as age of a participants, with large excellent for those who fail to comply.
Thirdly, a Bill is all-encompassing that a enforcement will possibly be selective or ridiculous. An imprudent enforcement of a law would mean that a cruise of two persons or more who have been not family members is seen as a open assembly. Hence, a organisers contingency surprise a military 10 days in advance. Picnic contingency not be inside of 50 meter of a overpass or a school. Persons next 21 years aged cannot organise picnic. Finally, relatives who bring young kids to picnics organized by non-family members might be fined up to RM 20,000. There will be no military crew left to unit a streets if a military have to handle a notification of all open assemblies. If cruise should not need allege notification to a police, where do you pull a line upon alternative open assemblies? Leaving a discretion to a military will not outcome in lack of harmony as well as Type equation here.injustice though also breed corruption.
Fourthly, a Bill does not forestall violence. The argument that you need limitation upon leisure of open to ensure assent is flawed. What disrupts assent is violence, that is regulated by a Penal Code. The threat to assent in Malaysia is not leisure of assembly, though parole upon assault where sure buliding can bluster others with assault as well as walk away freely though being charged for rapist intimidation. To forestall assault by! restric ting open assemblies makes as most clarity as to forestall pickpockets by handcuffing pedestrians.
Fifthly,the Bill is unconstitutional as well as unMalaysian. The view that Malaysians can express themselves through alternative means thus leisure of open can be suppressed is flawed. If Malaysians do not need leisure of assembly, it should not appear in Article 10(1)(b) of a Federal Constitution. Malaysians contingency have a right to peaceably assemble because you have been not slaves. Those who explain that Malaysians carrying leisure is dangerous show their highest contempt to not usually a Federal Constitution, though a very notion of Malaysia as a giveaway nation.
The Dewan Negara is meant to check a excesses as well as ill-considered decisions of a Dewan Rakyat, as a role of each top house in bicameral legislature. The Dewan Rakyat erred upon compromising a Federal Constitution as well as encroaching Malaysians' leisure upon Nov 29. The Dewan Negara contingency scold this mistake today. The Senators contingency fulfil their pledge to defend a Constitution as well as a freedom. They contingency vote against a Peaceful Assembly Bill, that is not to preserve assent though to suppress assembly. Each as well as each of a Senators will be held accountable by history as well as a generations to come for their decision today upon a freedom.
- Killthebill.org
Read More @ Source



More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz

No comments: