Is the Deputy IGP whitewashing a misappropriation?

Thinking Malaysians have been disturbed by a uncivilised conduct of a Deputy Inspector-General of Police, Khalid Abu Bakar. He was obviously perplexing to cover up for a Umno Wanita personality Shahrizat Jalil during a Umno General Assembly.

Khalid Abu Bakar - Photograph: sinarharian.com.my

Shahrizat is under heated inspection over a scandalous beef-breeding project, which was undertaken by her husband through their company, National Feedlot Corporation (NFC), with a soft-loan of RM250m from a government.

Following a Auditor-General's damning avowal which this plan is in a "mess", many startling as well as unfortunate 'fishy' details have been unearthed by a Opposition. All these allegations of incorrectness involve supports meant for a national stock plan to yield a poor supply of beef to Malaysians.

From a allegations, it would appear which there has been obvious abuse as well as mismanagement of public supports suggesting corruption. This strenuous as well as glaring justification cannot be simply overlooked or covered-up or pushed under a carpet.

Khalid's contention which "investigations have so distant not suggested any component of crime in a RM250m NFC" debacle is far-fetched, absolutely but consequence as well as cannot be believed.

It has been purported in no capricious terms with regard to a abuse of a funds:

That Shahrizat's family paid for two super oppulance condos in Bangsar for RM6.9m each;

That RM3m discount was given to a family-owned company;

That RM3.3m was used to buy a Mercedes CLS350 as well as residential land in Putrajaya;

That half a million was channelled to a family organisation in Singapore;

That outrageous sums of income were paid to a debate group for fam! ily "hol idays";

That a loan was expelled even prior to a agreement was signed.

The above sheer allegations obviously settle which a income was not used for a purpose a loan was granted. That being a case, apparently a income was mismanaged as well as misappropriated, suggesting wrong-doing.

Is it probable which this aspect of a abuse of a loan could have left neglected as well as but being investigated? Didn't warning bells ring while a review was ongoing?

Didn't it strike a investigators which something was sincerely wrong for a loan to have been expelled prior to a agreement was even signed? Who certified this outrageous loan of RM250m to be expelled but a agreement duly sealed as well as stamped? Was this line of review undertaken?

When income meant for a specific plan was channelled in to a family organisation which has nothing to do with a project, doesn't it consecrate embezzlement? Isn't piracy same to corruption?

Under whose name(s) have been a oppulance condos, a land in Putrajaya as well as a car registered?

Who went upon a family holidays as well as who certified a use of a loa! n, meant for a stock project, for this in isolation purpose?

The timing as well as a attempt to transparent Shahrizat in this debacle is suspect as well as cannot be explained divided as coincidence. Why did a Deputy IGP select to exhibit this during a Umno General Assembly when a review is ongoing? It was obviously meant to 'save' Shahrizat from prying questions. Some would even disagree which it was meant to pull wool over a Umno delegates' eyes.

When an official from a highest row of a military force is viewed to be a functionary of a domestic party afterwards what credibility is there for a police?

The person in a street is entirely unhappy as well as disillusioned because a military have been incompetent to discharge their avocation as well as responsibility in an just as well as professional manner which would have brought respect as well as credit to a mil! itary fo rce.

P Ramakrishnan
Executive cabinet member
6 Dec 2011

PLEASE SUPPORT ALIRAN

Read More @ Source

More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |

Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz