SHAH ALAM, Sept 29 The High Court here was told which a forensics military military officer never found out what came of a tests connected with a equipment his group including DNA samples collected, during a Sosilawati Lawiya attempted murder conference today.
Royal Malaysia Police Forensic Laboratory emissary arch ACP Hussin Omar Khan, 41, a senior military military officer of a police's forensics department pronounced he did enquire after to a applicable persons about a equipment collected during Banting locations, though received no reply.
He was being cross-examined by N.Patmanabhan's counsel Manjeet Singh Dillon, as well as was a prosecution's 51st witness. He was replying to a subject whether he worried about a more than 400 objects retrieved by a forensics team, Bernama Online reported.
N.Pathmanabhan, 41, a former counsel as well as his three plantation hands, T.Thilaiyalagan, 19, R.Matan, 20, as well as R.Khatavarayan, 30, have been indicted of murdering Sosilawati (picture), 47, bank military military officer Noorhisham Mohamad, 38, counsel Ahmad Kamil Abdul Karim, 32, as well as Sosilawati's motorist Kamaruddin Shamsuddin, 44, during Lot 2001, Jalan Tanjong Layang, Tanjung Sepat, Banting, between 8.30pm as well as 9.45pm upon Aug 30, 2010.
Charged under Section 302 of a Penal Code review with Section 34 of a Penal Code, all 4 face a genocide chastisement is found guilty.
Amer Hamzah Arshad, representing second indicted Matan, told a justice a marine scuba divers were not regulating gloves when searching in a Kanchong Laut stream in Kg Endah Banting upon Sep 14 last year.
Hussin replied which they had no gloves because a ones they had detonate as well as were mislaid during sea. He combined a murky waters forced them to use bare hands to shift by a riverbank as well as a deeper ends, notwithstanding a risk of ! contamin ating any intensity evidence.
In re-examination by emissary public prosecutor Idham Abdul Ghani, Husin simplified which a sam process has been used prior to as well as not been questioned.
Idham asked because a bone samples discovered upon Sep 15, 2010 not weighed. Husn pronounced a weighing was to be finished by a hospital they sent a samples to.
Amer in his cross-examination asserted given a forensics group did not sign Panchau River's current levels as well as a bone samples' weight, they have been not in a in front of to determine because a skeleton did not deposit to sea. Hussin disagreed with a assertion.
Hussin during re-examination pronounced a marks upon a skeleton may sojourn even after washing, depending upon a soaking technique.
Manjeet referred to a area a forensics group dug for justification during a Gadong plantation is contaminated by animal faeces (dogs or cows). The prosecution is asserting this was where a victims were killed.
Manjeet pronounced this competence insist because a initial exam finished by Hussin's group during a site regulating a hemocculet sensor label upon 58 dirt samples tested certain for blood, though after a Chemistry Department's exam showed negative.
He referred to a cows as well as dogs' faeces may enclose blood, if a pronounced animals had abdominal problems, as well as absorbed to a belligerent by sleet water.
He referred to which animals such as cows as well as dogs experienced abdominal problems as humans as well as their faeces could possibly enclose blood, which could be absorbed into a belligerent when it rained.
Hussin agreed to this assessment.
The conference continues tomorrow prior to Justice Datuk Akhtar Tahir.
No comments:
Post a Comment