Even if new confidence laws replacing a Internal Security Act (ISA) provide for legal review, it will be of small make use of as Malaysia's Judiciary has a "frightening record", says constitutional counsel Tommy Thomas.
"I would not certitude a judges of any country in this universe for my liberty. we certitude a politicians a bit some-more since they have to answer to multitude once each 5 years. Judges never have to."
Based upon his experience, pronounced Thomas (right), who has been in practice for 35 years, he doubted a Judiciary in Malaysia would uphold autocracy if a supervision abused a confidence laws.
"I see no goal in legal reviews. As a practicising lawyer, we judge a future by a past as well as present - as well as I'm afraid a track jot down is frightening. No thanks! Not a judges," he pronounced during an forum upon abolishing a ISA as well as Emergency Ordinance final night.
The alternative speakers were Sungei Siput MP Dr D Jeyakumar, Suaram executive Kua Kia Soong as well as Abolish ISA Movement (GMI) chief Syed Ibrahim Syed Noh.
!
In announcing a number of law reforms upon a night of Sept 15, including a repeal of a ISA, Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak had pronounced a energy to magnify apprehension in a new laws which would come in to place would be changed to a courts.
The genuine solution, Thomas said, was do to away with all detention-without-trial laws altogether, but any replacement.
"We do not need some-more laws. we keep revelation people which Malaysia has smashing laws. What we want is better enforcement.
"Parliamentarians all over a universe contend which a panacea for any disease is some-more ! laws, bu t sorry, which is not a way."
'Situation for confidence laws orchestrated'
Thomas added which in any multitude when there is a strife in between confidence as well as polite liberties, a state as well as a individual, "the state as well as confidence always win".
While a panellists were joined opposite any form of subsitute laws to replace a ISA as well as alternative puncture laws, another, Kua, warned which a supervision competence create a incident which would concede such laws to be pushed th! rough.
To infer his point, Kua drew courtesy to a drafting of a ISA in 1960 as an instrument to combat comrade insurgency among a backdrop of a subsiding conflict.
"Despite a misadventure rate during a Emergency dropping really drastically, a ISA was still passed. There was no justification for that."
Kua pronounced a role of anti-ISA movements such as Suaram as well as GMI had yet to end as well as all contingency be joined in hostile any law providing for apprehension but trial.
"It is upon us now to begin a accord to set up up a movement led by a GMI to prevent a supervision from orchestrating justification for new terrorism laws," he said.
Minister in Prime Minister Department Mohamed Nazri Abdul Aziz has pronounced which even though a ISA would be repealed, its two replacements would still contain provisions for apprehension but trial.
Malaysians Must Know a TRUTH "I would not certitude a judges of any country in this universe for my liberty. we certitude a politicians a bit some-more since they have to answer to multitude once each 5 years. Judges never have to."
Based upon his experience, pronounced Thomas (right), who has been in practice for 35 years, he doubted a Judiciary in Malaysia would uphold autocracy if a supervision abused a confidence laws."I see no goal in legal reviews. As a practicising lawyer, we judge a future by a past as well as present - as well as I'm afraid a track jot down is frightening. No thanks! Not a judges," he pronounced during an forum upon abolishing a ISA as well as Emergency Ordinance final night.
The alternative speakers were Sungei Siput MP Dr D Jeyakumar, Suaram executive Kua Kia Soong as well as Abolish ISA Movement (GMI) chief Syed Ibrahim Syed Noh.
!
In announcing a number of law reforms upon a night of Sept 15, including a repeal of a ISA, Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak had pronounced a energy to magnify apprehension in a new laws which would come in to place would be changed to a courts.
The genuine solution, Thomas said, was do to away with all detention-without-trial laws altogether, but any replacement.
"We do not need some-more laws. we keep revelation people which Malaysia has smashing laws. What we want is better enforcement.
"Parliamentarians all over a universe contend which a panacea for any disease is some-more ! laws, bu t sorry, which is not a way."
'Situation for confidence laws orchestrated'
Thomas added which in any multitude when there is a strife in between confidence as well as polite liberties, a state as well as a individual, "the state as well as confidence always win".
While a panellists were joined opposite any form of subsitute laws to replace a ISA as well as alternative puncture laws, another, Kua, warned which a supervision competence create a incident which would concede such laws to be pushed th! rough.To infer his point, Kua drew courtesy to a drafting of a ISA in 1960 as an instrument to combat comrade insurgency among a backdrop of a subsiding conflict.
"Despite a misadventure rate during a Emergency dropping really drastically, a ISA was still passed. There was no justification for that."
Kua pronounced a role of anti-ISA movements such as Suaram as well as GMI had yet to end as well as all contingency be joined in hostile any law providing for apprehension but trial.
"It is upon us now to begin a accord to set up up a movement led by a GMI to prevent a supervision from orchestrating justification for new terrorism laws," he said.
Minister in Prime Minister Department Mohamed Nazri Abdul Aziz has pronounced which even though a ISA would be repealed, its two replacements would still contain provisions for apprehension but trial.
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment