KUALA LUMPUR, Sept nineteen A former senior military military officer accused Putrajaya currently of revelation last year to Attorney-General Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patails role in allegedly equivocating justification when it corroborated an independent panels commentary upon Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahims black-eye case.
The former tip patrolman insisted currently which with Putrajayas endorsement, there was no longer the need to form the stately elect of exploration or the judiciary to investigate Abdul Ganis involvement.
This is since there is already the prima facie box against Abdul Gani (picture)and those aiding him upon equivocating evidence, pronounced former KL CID chief Datuk Mat Zain Ibrahim in an open minute to Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Ismail Omar today.
He additionally claimed which Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak was wakeful of Abdul Ganis impasse as the former had been briefed as well as was provided finish justification in October 2008, when he was still the countrys deputy budding minister.
Mat Zain pronounced he had briefed Najib at the latters Finance Ministry office in Putrajaya, adding which he had assumed the leader would take appropriate movement once he took upon the budding ministers post.
The forgive which there is miss of justification should not be lifted again. Saying serve investigations have been indispensable would additionally be irrelevant since the independent row has already decided as well as the supervision has endorsed it, he forked out.
In Jul 2008, Anwar had filed the military report, accusing Abdul Gani, Mat Zain, former Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Musa Hassan as well as the Dr Abdul Rahman Yusof of equivocating the healing report upon his black-eye case, which purported which his injuries ! had been self-inflicted.
Three independent row members tasked to look in to the justification fabrication claims comprising Federal as well as Court of ! Appeal j udges later privileged Abdul Gani as well as Musa of the allegations, but the standing of Mat Zain as well as Dr Abdul Rahman remained uncertain.
Mat Zain, who had progressing claimed the arrangement of the row itself as unconstitutional as well as which the commentary should be deemed null as well as void, reiterated currently which the row had returned the 2-1 decision, with the single member having found sworn make the difference joining Abdul Gani to wrongdoing.
However, the supervision itself strongly against my challenge (on claims which the row was unconstitutional), until the apportion in the Prime Ministers Department even made the lengthy ministerial make the difference in Parliament in Dec 2010.
The supervision validated the arrangement of the three-member row as well as as such, the preference of the row was additionally considered valid, pronounced Mat Zain.
The statement, he said, in conclusion meant which Putrajaya had validated Abdul Ganis crimes as it had corroborated the commentary by all 3 row members, including the the single who had found the Attorney-General guilty of wrongdoing.
Mat Zain additionally slammed Musa for denying recently in Berita Harian the accusations against him as well as Abdul Gani, indicating out to the former IGP which the make the difference was lifted by Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad in his not long ago expelled memoirs A Doctor in The House.
Among others, Dr Mahathir suggested which Musa Hassan had assured him of Anwars homosexual activities. There contingency have been the little very special information which Musa disclosed in sequence to convince Tun of this.
Hopefully, he (Musa) will not claim which the display in Tuns memoirs was additionally the partial of the conspiracy planned by Anwar, he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment