Internet entrance in BolehLand is an enviousness by many nations which have no entrance to a internet or very despotic entrance or censorship in a likes of Communist Capitalist China.
And you should thank 1Malaysia for during least for a impulse gripping to ole Tun's promise which there will be no censorship of a internet. Though these days, no censorship is as rootless as 'tau foo fah'.
While you might debate what can, cannot or should not be censored, there is a flourishing courtesy of a government's stand in standard in receiving action, punitive ones during times opposite those who do not write or await politically scold views.
We have been all aware of a government's swift movement taken opposite opposition or pro opposition websites, blogs as well as even tweets, even upon mere hearsay or lies or groups creation military report opposite such online sources. While, many pro as well as politically scold online sources have been since 100% uncensored leisure to write unsubstantiated reports, supportive racist as well as religious remarks as well as what not.
At least for a impulse a rights as well as leisure as well as censorship of a internet is put upon hold, perhaps until a supervision gets behind its two-thirds majority?
Even if a supervision takes punitive movement opposite those who speak about ideology banned by a government, or supportive hate views of this or which religion, nothing is finished to bury those millions of websites which lift views which have been not politically scold to UMNO as well as BN. So it's behind to what a supervision does many appropriate - resourceful charge as well as stand in standard. They have perfected it which they do not even see actions they take as resourceful charge as well as will additionally move a laws which accede to them a right to take action. The operative word is a law protects them as well as if you break a law you compensate is a mentality being adopted as w! ell as u sed as argument to nullify any ! suggesti ons which a authorities have been putting in service stand in standard even if a open thinks otherwise. Perhaps GE13 will a a public's reply to such arrogance huh?
Has Bolehland's supervision set a good e.g. during least in regulating its chronicle of cyberlaws which will be in a forefront of influencing a general community with courtesy to cyberlaws? See partial story below.
Noone disputes which certain content can or should be censored. But, do you have a authority to direct which censorship as well as presumably a crime emanate for 'insulting sacrament as well as rulers?' If you oppose a way your sacrament is trampled upon as well as find legal redress as well as justice, have been you scornful another's religion?
And scornful rulers relates to nations which feel kingship has aptitude or a royalties have been towering to a standing of God! In BolehLand, it is a taboo as well as a crime upon a same level as lse majest law to say anything politically improper opposite a royalty. Are you asking David Cameron to hospital a law in UK to criminalise their citizens for creation remarks opposite QEII or a royal family? What's a disproportion between scornful a King, Ruler or even dictators as well as Heads of Government? We have seen those who insult their leaders branded as criminals such as in Communist China or dictators of many banana republics! And BolehLand is not too distant divided from perhaps criminalising anyone who makes politically improper statement or views about their present domestic leader no?
So a Minister of Information is misinformed if he wishes to promulgate to a general community to include insult to God as well as Rulers as crimes many foul. In many grown countries, even a so called regressive Godly U.S. of A, sacrament as well as a state have been not supposed to mix! So have been Christian democracies which separate God as well as politics!
Can you overtly preach to a general community which a jot down of! apply o neself as well as leisure of sacrament is impeccable? And upon scornful religion, a internet has mi! llions o f websites, any extolling which whatever sacrament it is lay explain which theirs is a loyal one as well as others false. So have been these religions claiming to ceremony a loyal God, scornful a Minister's sacrament where behind home it is considered a loyal sacrament as well as God as well as which plurarity is as haram as immoderate ethanol or pork, huh?
Let us hope which you be common than try to teach a universe which you have been a summary of defence cyberspace with a cyberlaws!
Let us hope they don't introduce a 1Malaysia email comment to snoop into people's lives as well as have some cronies rich!
Bolehland proposing cyberlaws to a general community as well as universe is like you priesthood to them about a tellurian rights jot down as well as tellurian rights hah! Is a Minister trying to have 1Malaysia demeanour like a cool 1Cybersurfer too huh?
----------------------------------
Malaysia will introduce cyberlaws relating to a rights as well as leisure of internet users to forestall abuse during a International Cyberlaw Seminar in London in early November.
Information Communication as well as Culture Minister Datuk Seri Dr Rais Yatim pronounced a internet should be used to benefit knowledge in line with development of information information exchnage record which has its advantages as well as disadvantages.
"We wish local as well as general values to be inculcated so which a outward universe does not only demeanour during tellurian rights but additionally strengthen humans from decadence."We will move it (the Malaysian experience) over there. Absolute or 100 percent leisure is unwarranted.
"There must be worth as well as technical specifications. For example, young kids can't watch pornography, gamble, insult sacrament as well as a rulers. All this will be discussed during a general seminar."...Bernam! a Sep 29 , 2011.
And you should thank 1Malaysia for during least for a impulse gripping to ole Tun's promise which there will be no censorship of a internet. Though these days, no censorship is as rootless as 'tau foo fah'.
While you might debate what can, cannot or should not be censored, there is a flourishing courtesy of a government's stand in standard in receiving action, punitive ones during times opposite those who do not write or await politically scold views.
We have been all aware of a government's swift movement taken opposite opposition or pro opposition websites, blogs as well as even tweets, even upon mere hearsay or lies or groups creation military report opposite such online sources. While, many pro as well as politically scold online sources have been since 100% uncensored leisure to write unsubstantiated reports, supportive racist as well as religious remarks as well as what not.
At least for a impulse a rights as well as leisure as well as censorship of a internet is put upon hold, perhaps until a supervision gets behind its two-thirds majority?
Even if a supervision takes punitive movement opposite those who speak about ideology banned by a government, or supportive hate views of this or which religion, nothing is finished to bury those millions of websites which lift views which have been not politically scold to UMNO as well as BN. So it's behind to what a supervision does many appropriate - resourceful charge as well as stand in standard. They have perfected it which they do not even see actions they take as resourceful charge as well as will additionally move a laws which accede to them a right to take action. The operative word is a law protects them as well as if you break a law you compensate is a mentality being adopted as w! ell as u sed as argument to nullify any ! suggesti ons which a authorities have been putting in service stand in standard even if a open thinks otherwise. Perhaps GE13 will a a public's reply to such arrogance huh?
Has Bolehland's supervision set a good e.g. during least in regulating its chronicle of cyberlaws which will be in a forefront of influencing a general community with courtesy to cyberlaws? See partial story below.
Noone disputes which certain content can or should be censored. But, do you have a authority to direct which censorship as well as presumably a crime emanate for 'insulting sacrament as well as rulers?' If you oppose a way your sacrament is trampled upon as well as find legal redress as well as justice, have been you scornful another's religion?
And scornful rulers relates to nations which feel kingship has aptitude or a royalties have been towering to a standing of God! In BolehLand, it is a taboo as well as a crime upon a same level as lse majest law to say anything politically improper opposite a royalty. Are you asking David Cameron to hospital a law in UK to criminalise their citizens for creation remarks opposite QEII or a royal family? What's a disproportion between scornful a King, Ruler or even dictators as well as Heads of Government? We have seen those who insult their leaders branded as criminals such as in Communist China or dictators of many banana republics! And BolehLand is not too distant divided from perhaps criminalising anyone who makes politically improper statement or views about their present domestic leader no?
So a Minister of Information is misinformed if he wishes to promulgate to a general community to include insult to God as well as Rulers as crimes many foul. In many grown countries, even a so called regressive Godly U.S. of A, sacrament as well as a state have been not supposed to mix! So have been Christian democracies which separate God as well as politics!
Can you overtly preach to a general community which a jot down of! apply o neself as well as leisure of sacrament is impeccable? And upon scornful religion, a internet has mi! llions o f websites, any extolling which whatever sacrament it is lay explain which theirs is a loyal one as well as others false. So have been these religions claiming to ceremony a loyal God, scornful a Minister's sacrament where behind home it is considered a loyal sacrament as well as God as well as which plurarity is as haram as immoderate ethanol or pork, huh?
Let us hope which you be common than try to teach a universe which you have been a summary of defence cyberspace with a cyberlaws!
Let us hope they don't introduce a 1Malaysia email comment to snoop into people's lives as well as have some cronies rich!
Bolehland proposing cyberlaws to a general community as well as universe is like you priesthood to them about a tellurian rights jot down as well as tellurian rights hah! Is a Minister trying to have 1Malaysia demeanour like a cool 1Cybersurfer too huh?
----------------------------------
Malaysia will introduce cyberlaws relating to a rights as well as leisure of internet users to forestall abuse during a International Cyberlaw Seminar in London in early November.
Information Communication as well as Culture Minister Datuk Seri Dr Rais Yatim pronounced a internet should be used to benefit knowledge in line with development of information information exchnage record which has its advantages as well as disadvantages.
"We wish local as well as general values to be inculcated so which a outward universe does not only demeanour during tellurian rights but additionally strengthen humans from decadence."We will move it (the Malaysian experience) over there. Absolute or 100 percent leisure is unwarranted.
"There must be worth as well as technical specifications. For example, young kids can't watch pornography, gamble, insult sacrament as well as a rulers. All this will be discussed during a general seminar."...Bernam! a Sep 29 , 2011.
- YAHMEH!!!
Malaysians Must Know a TRUTH Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment