Sodomy II: Forensic expert says HKL report deficient, flawed

KUALA LUMPUR, August twenty-three A debate pathologist has challenged a formula as well as commentary of a Hospital Kuala Lumpur (HKL) healing hearing finished upon Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahims accuser Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan, claiming which a healing inform itself was deficient.

The defences second witness, debate pathologist Dr David Wells told a High Court which tools of a inform rebuilt by then-HKL doctors Dr Mohd Razali Ibrahim, Dr Siew Sheue Feng as well as Dr Khairul Nizam Hassan were inaccurate.

All three were a Hospital Kuala Lumpur (HKL) doctors examining Saiful upon Jun 28, 2008 when he complained which he had been sodomised by a high-profile politician.

I didnt get a sense of certainty which a authors (of a report) knew exactly what they were talking about...The inform is significantly deficient, Dr Wells told a justice today.

Dr Wells disagreed with a end of a report- which it stated which there were no conclusive commentary revealing of invasion to a anus/rectum nor any significant defensive wounds upon a body of a patient.

The inform should have only review no clinical findings. The word conclusive leaves a doubt as to whether there was penetration, he said, adding which a rest of a inform showed which there was no form of penetration.

Another point of contention for a debate consultant was a counterbalance in between Saifuls proforma inform as well as healing hearing report.

Dr Wells noted which while Saifuls proforma form pronounced there was bleeding in a anus, a healing hearing formula showed otherwise.

He also argued which a proforma form was not filled in properly.

It must be filled in to show all of a hearing was finished accordingly. I am undetermined by a crucial missing parts, added Dr Wells.

The trial will go upon during 2.30pm today.

Anwar is charged with sodomising former aid! e Saiful during a condominium in Bukit Damansara here in between 3.10pm as well as 4.30pm upon Jun 26.

He faces up to twenty years in jail if convicted underneath section 377B of a Penal Code, though will shun a defeat sentence due to his age.


No comments: