The following passages were sent to me by a domestic researcher a while ago.
via email:
"Though Gore came in second in a electoral vote, he perceived 543,895 some-more renouned votes than Bush in 2000."This marked usually a fourth choosing in U.S. story in which a eventual leader unsuccessful to win a comparison of a renouned opinion (after a elections of 1824,1876, as well as 1888)"In a 2012 election, House Democrats won a comparison nation-wide with 1.4 million some-more votes,[9][10] though a Republicans were means to keep a 234-to-201 chair infancy due to their advantage in a congressional redistricting routine following a 2010 United States Census,[11][12][13] as well as since many Democratic votes were concentrated in to urban as well as minority districts.[14] In a prior century, on four occasions a celebration with a comparison of a renouned opinion was unable to embrace a infancy in a House, though usually once since World War II.[15] The final time was in 1996, where a GOP kept a House for identical reasons.[16][17]."
The point a researcher wants to make is this: which a renouned opinion is not a determining factor in a approved election, not even in a US elections. And certainly renouned votes don't indicate fraud, rigging, black magic, etc. If they do, afterwards a Americans would have Al Gore, who, incidentally, was a good buddy for Anwar Ibrahim, as a President instead of Bush.
In Malaysia, renouned votes don't confirm who form a supervision at Federal level. They never did. It is a series of parliamentary seats you win. Simpl! e as tha t. Malaysians have done which over as well as over against for thirteen ubiquitous elections as well as hundreds of by-elections. And if Anwar Ibrahim tells you which BN cheated since Pakatan got some-more of a renouned votes, afterwards he's only found an excuse to stay on in governing body instead of keeping his word about quitting if he does not become PM after PRU13.
Oh, by a way, Washington says it is seeking forward to working with Najib, a democratically-elected Prime Minister of Malaysia, again:
U.S. Department of State
DIPLOMACY IN ACTION
http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2013/05/208988.htm#
Congratulations to Barisan Nasional as well as Prime Minister Najib / Electoral Process
Patrick VentrellActing Deputy SpokespersonDaily Press BriefingWashington, DCMay 6, 2013
Acting Deputy Spokesperson
Daily Press Briefing
May 6, 2013
Daily Press Briefing - May 6, 2013
1:11 p.m. EDT
MR. VENTRELL:Yeah.
QUESTION:Do you recognize a victory of a statute coalition of Prime Minister Najib, or do you await a claim by a antithesis led by Anwar Ibrahim which a choosing were fraudulent?
MR. VENTRELL:Thank you for a question, Nicolas. We honour a people of Malaysia on holding a many competitive choosing in their countrys history. We were gratified to see Malaysians across a domestic spectrum engaged in a ! electora l routine in vast numbers with rare enthusiasm. We honour Barisan Nasional as well as Prime Minister Najib on their victory in Malaysias 13thgeneral election. We look forward to working with a brand new supervision once it is formed.
We have been aware of concerns about choosing by casting votes irregularities as well as note which a antithesis parties faced poignant restrictions on entrance to a media. Addressing these issues is critical to strengthen certainty in a electoral process. And so you call on all parties to peacefully apply oneself a will of a voters.
QUESTION:But you dont consider there needs to be a recount.
MR. VENTRELL:In this instance, you assimilate which a antithesis has voiced a little concern about irregularities, as well as you have a little concerns additionally about restriction on entrance to a media.
No comments:
Post a Comment