Our unofficial national clarion call, Malaysia Boleh, has turn both an expression of proper honour in a Malaysian achievement as good as cynical criticism in a Malaysian action of dodgy-ness, thelatter usually compared with officialdom or those approved, sponsored or corroborated by officialdom.
in a unvaried he once adore wakakaka
Malaysiakini reported in5 'phantom' buses stopped, MP as good as sons arrestedthat PKR leader Gobalakrishnan, MP for Padang Serai, as good as his dual sons plus a supporter, adopted a PKR 'core' group's habit of interlude buses, allegedly full of phantom voters.
![]()
Okay, follow which up with his some-more recent call toAmend constitution to frame Ambiga's citizenship. As reported by Malaysiakini, Dr Mahathir stated:
Read More @ Source
! More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
It would not be untrue to vouch for a Election Commission of Malaysia (EC) has a Malaysia Boleh stamp, not distinct a SIRIM trademark for Malaysian constructed goods yet certainly, intheopinion ofthepublic, not likethestandards SIRIM has set, or anywhere nearby that.
You as good can confirm which facet of Malaysia Boleh would be applicable for a EC.
In 2008 BN suffered a major setback in a March ubiquitous as good as state elections where it mislaid a 36-year aged two-third majorityin sovereign parliament, as good as a order in thestates of Penang, Kedah, Selangor as good as Perak (Kelantan stays underneath PAS rule).
ThoughtheBN's 140 seats in sovereign council in 2008 provides a large infancy over Pakatan's 82, there was many wailing, rentingofsack cloth as good as covering their selves in ashes in BN, as iftheworld hadcometo an end. The former UMNO MB of Perakwentinto deep shock as good as cried.
Worse, a lossof a richest as good as many iconic state of Selangor was many as good many tobearfor dear aged UMNO. The waste werenotonly domestic yet financial as good as celebration honour as well.
UMNO has had 5 years to devise to hold onto a 140 parliamentary seats if not add some-more as good as to win ba! ck Selan gor as good as where probable Kedah as good as Perak as well.
Of late we have to admit we have been rsther than surprised by Najib's special focus on Penang, when a island state, if we might contend so, is in ubiquitous not deliberate critical to UMNO's pride.
Perhaps Najib wants to help his MCA as good as Gerakan mateys regain a little footing, atleastfor BN's window dressing if nothing else.
And Isuppose which probable instruct to shore up MCA as good as Gerakan to a little semblance of their particular former domestic lives as good as relevance would be due to Najib being a male who is terribly penetrating on form ratherthansubstance, as he once demonstratedtowards Ong Tee Keat - see my September 2006 postCorruption 'Fact' for DPM Najib & Hishamuddin.
I hold Ah Jib Gor likes to see a BN with a little Chinese participation -wouldthat be a covenant to his multiracial 1Malaysia credentials? wakakaka.
You as good can confirm which facet of Malaysia Boleh would be applicable for a EC.
In 2008 BN suffered a major setback in a March ubiquitous as good as state elections where it mislaid a 36-year aged two-third majorityin sovereign parliament, as good as a order in thestates of Penang, Kedah, Selangor as good as Perak (Kelantan stays underneath PAS rule).
ThoughtheBN's 140 seats in sovereign council in 2008 provides a large infancy over Pakatan's 82, there was many wailing, rentingofsack cloth as good as covering their selves in ashes in BN, as iftheworld hadcometo an end. The former UMNO MB of Perakwentinto deep shock as good as cried.
Worse, a lossof a richest as good as many iconic state of Selangor was many as good many tobearfor dear aged UMNO. The waste werenotonly domestic yet financial as good as celebration honour as well.
UMNO has had 5 years to devise to hold onto a 140 parliamentary seats if not add some-more as good as to win ba! ck Selan gor as good as where probable Kedah as good as Perak as well.
Of late we have to admit we have been rsther than surprised by Najib's special focus on Penang, when a island state, if we might contend so, is in ubiquitous not deliberate critical to UMNO's pride.
Perhaps Najib wants to help his MCA as good as Gerakan mateys regain a little footing, atleastfor BN's window dressing if nothing else.
And Isuppose which probable instruct to shore up MCA as good as Gerakan to a little semblance of their particular former domestic lives as good as relevance would be due to Najib being a male who is terribly penetrating on form ratherthansubstance, as he once demonstratedtowards Ong Tee Keat - see my September 2006 postCorruption 'Fact' for DPM Najib & Hishamuddin.
I hold Ah Jib Gor likes to see a BN with a little Chinese participation -wouldthat be a covenant to his multiracial 1Malaysia credentials? wakakaka.
Okay, I've no disbelief a EC has been tasked to safeguard afavourableoutcomefor BN in GE-13, as good as let'snotmince difference as roughly everyone together with BN people knows a care in a EC, identical to those in a Police, Civil Service as good as Judiciary, have been pro UMNO people, withsomeeven consideringthemselvesas UMNO employees.
But nonetheless, form (of democratic process) contingency still be recorded ev! en as pi ece (of a desired outcome) is being worked at.
For example, gerrymandering is good as good as truly alive in a choosing system. The aim of gerrymandering is to advantage or disadvantage sold constituents, as good as don't we usually know who as good as what will be advantaged as good as disadvantaged.
An e.g. of gerrymandering techniques in Malaysia would be a compressed packing of opposition electorate identical to sardines in to seats unlikely to be won by BN such as Kapar. The aim is to revoke a representation of a electorate who do not await BN whilst obscenely enlarging by jagged quantum those ancillary UMNO.
The Kapar contra Putrajaya dichotomy has beena terribly obvious case of shameful gerrymandering, where a former (Kapar) a Pakatan building has 120,000 electorate in a single sovereign subdivision whilst a latter (Putrajaya), an UMNO building by trait of itspredominatelyBTN-ized civil servant residents, has a small 6,000 electorate represented by additionally a single part of of council (MP), as for Kapar.
Ketuanan UMNO has been assured by as many as a 2,000 percentile guarantee. And no consternation Tengku Adnan not long ago thanked Najib openly forthe PM's present of shoo-ing him in as theassured MP for PJ. Eat your heart out, Khairy, wakakaka.
If a EC as a supposedly eccentric organization possesses a unprejudiced firmness it should have, it wouldhave anaverageof 60,000 (or up to 80,000) perfederalconstituency, so thateachandveryMalaysian voter would suffer a same 'voice' in parliament.
Such a fair proceed would have Kapar represented by 2 MPs whilst a residentsofPutrajayawouldhave been purebred electorate in a sovereign subdivision of, say, 60,000 as good as definitely not by it trifling sized self.
But as mentioned, a EC is neither eccentric nor unbiased.
In 2007Malaysiakini reported in itsEC 'helping' UMNO secure PenangthatDanny Law Heng Kiang (DAP) alleged a EC was utilizing a electoral bounds in Penang to enlarge Malay-winning state seats for UMNO's benefits.
Law claimed which a gerrymand! ering strategy was identical to UMNO tactics conducted in Sabah in recent years as good as Malacca about 3 decades ago. The dual states have given been in a firm nails of UMNO.
According to him, we should expect changes in foster of UMNO even with a Chinese creation up some-more than 70% of Penang's estimated race of 1.3 million. He pointed out which usually 22 state seats or 55 percent were Chinese-majority constituencies. But a Malays (meaning UMNO), who constituted reduction than 25% of a population, dominated 15 state constituencies or 40 percent of a state seats.
Well might be as a demography has given altered or perhaps maynot even have altered much, yet trust a amazing EC to work out UMNO's winning ways.
Nonetheless, according toLaw, seats with Chinese-majority had an normal 20,000 electorate whilst a Malay! -dominat ed constituencies an normal of 11,000 electorate for example, a Chinese-dominated Paya Terubong had been(based on 2007 figures)the biggest state seat with 23,490 electorate whilst a largest Malay seat, Permatang Berangan had usually 14,049 purebred voters.
But nonetheless, form (of democratic process) contingency still be recorded ev! en as pi ece (of a desired outcome) is being worked at.
For example, gerrymandering is good as good as truly alive in a choosing system. The aim of gerrymandering is to advantage or disadvantage sold constituents, as good as don't we usually know who as good as what will be advantaged as good as disadvantaged.
An e.g. of gerrymandering techniques in Malaysia would be a compressed packing of opposition electorate identical to sardines in to seats unlikely to be won by BN such as Kapar. The aim is to revoke a representation of a electorate who do not await BN whilst obscenely enlarging by jagged quantum those ancillary UMNO.
The Kapar contra Putrajaya dichotomy has beena terribly obvious case of shameful gerrymandering, where a former (Kapar) a Pakatan building has 120,000 electorate in a single sovereign subdivision whilst a latter (Putrajaya), an UMNO building by trait of itspredominatelyBTN-ized civil servant residents, has a small 6,000 electorate represented by additionally a single part of of council (MP), as for Kapar.
Ketuanan UMNO has been assured by as many as a 2,000 percentile guarantee. And no consternation Tengku Adnan not long ago thanked Najib openly forthe PM's present of shoo-ing him in as theassured MP for PJ. Eat your heart out, Khairy, wakakaka.
If a EC as a supposedly eccentric organization possesses a unprejudiced firmness it should have, it wouldhave anaverageof 60,000 (or up to 80,000) perfederalconstituency, so thateachandveryMalaysian voter would suffer a same 'voice' in parliament.
Such a fair proceed would have Kapar represented by 2 MPs whilst a residentsofPutrajayawouldhave been purebred electorate in a sovereign subdivision of, say, 60,000 as good as definitely not by it trifling sized self.
But as mentioned, a EC is neither eccentric nor unbiased.
In 2007Malaysiakini reported in itsEC 'helping' UMNO secure PenangthatDanny Law Heng Kiang (DAP) alleged a EC was utilizing a electoral bounds in Penang to enlarge Malay-winning state seats for UMNO's benefits.
Law claimed which a gerrymand! ering strategy was identical to UMNO tactics conducted in Sabah in recent years as good as Malacca about 3 decades ago. The dual states have given been in a firm nails of UMNO.
According to him, we should expect changes in foster of UMNO even with a Chinese creation up some-more than 70% of Penang's estimated race of 1.3 million. He pointed out which usually 22 state seats or 55 percent were Chinese-majority constituencies. But a Malays (meaning UMNO), who constituted reduction than 25% of a population, dominated 15 state constituencies or 40 percent of a state seats.
Well might be as a demography has given altered or perhaps maynot even have altered much, yet trust a amazing EC to work out UMNO's winning ways.
And if we were to compare Paya Terubong (23,490) to UMNO-controlled Teluk Bahang (10,791), a ratio of state representationwouldbe 2 to 1 in foster of a latter. It seems in Penang, a little people have dual votes whilst a rest have usually one.
Apart from gerrymandering, there have additionally been a covert variety where phantom electorate consisted of thetruly dead who could not usually walk yet vote, of course, for BN.
Additionally there were vital electorate whocould walkfrom subdivision to subdivision to exercisetheMalaysia Boleh-ness. Alas, Pakatan mislaid a chiefexorcist of 'phantoms' when Gobalakrishnan left PKR with a pant as good as a puff, wakakaka -see my 2008 post regarding thePermatang Pauh by-electionwhere we wrote:
in a unvaried he once adore wakakaka Malaysiakini reported in5 'phantom' buses stopped, MP as good as sons arrestedthat PKR leader Gobalakrishnan, MP for Padang Serai, as good as his dual sons plus a supporter, adopted a PKR 'core' group's habit of interlude buses, allegedly full of phantom voters.
We've of march heard of indelible ink yet we consternation during a efficacy in a Malaysia Boleh context.
Postal choosing by casting votes by a military as good as troops have been a sore point for a sovereign opposition, yet we have privately not been conflicting it forfearofdisenfranchisinglegitimate electorate who have been in uniformed and/or necessary services (armed forces, police, firemen, sanatorium as good as ambulance staff, etc).
It would be gross injustice to repudiate a people in uniformed and/or necessary services a right to opinion usually since they in ubiquitous have been pro BN.
It's not wrong to be pro BN yet it's definitely wrong to block out pro BN voters, intheway as it's wrong to sabotage pro Pakatan electorate by shifting them around to brand new constituencies as good as worse by stealth, without informing or providing them with presentation so which they might during least know where they have been to vote, as good as if they wish, lift bona fide objections or hurdles to a changes (where we have been shown examples which wereunconstitutionallyexercised bytheEC).
Nonetheless in fairness, we need to wakeful which it's universally notunusual for a infancy of militarypostal electorate to opinion conservative, as have been a trends in Australia (pro Coalition Party), USA (pro Republican Party) as good as UK (pro Conservative Party). In Malaysia, UMNO is a regressive party. Perhaps 'tomorrow' PKR as good as PAS might good be as well. Thus troops electorate preferringconservative(right wing) parties havenotbeen odd as good as should not be deliberate as sinister in itself.
It's not wrong to be pro BN yet it's definitely wrong to block out pro BN voters, intheway as it's wrong to sabotage pro Pakatan electorate by shifting them around to brand new constituencies as good as worse by stealth, without informing or providing them with presentation so which they might during least know where they have been to vote, as good as if they wish, lift bona fide objections or hurdles to a changes (where we have been shown examples which wereunconstitutionallyexercised bytheEC).
Nonetheless in fairness, we need to wakeful which it's universally notunusual for a infancy of militarypostal electorate to opinion conservative, as have been a trends in Australia (pro Coalition Party), USA (pro Republican Party) as good as UK (pro Conservative Party). In Malaysia, UMNO is a regressive party. Perhaps 'tomorrow' PKR as good as PAS might good be as well. Thus troops electorate preferringconservative(right wing) parties havenotbeen odd as good as should not be deliberate as sinister in itself.
But we draw a line conflicting together with (what we heard) military/police wives as postal electorate as a ladies have been not on necessary services, unless of coursethe wives themselves have been troops or military uniformed members, or a militaryandtheirwivesare stationed abroad or in a remote location. Minus these qualifications, we consider a inclusion of military/police wives as good as family members as gross abuse by a EC of a facility to safeguard electorate on necessary duties would not be disenfranchised.
The above have been all threats to fair as good as usually elections which we have been familiar with, yet nothing beats a shameful as good as obscene Grand Canyon-ish gap of Kapar contra Putrajaya constituencies in their particular numbers of purebred voters, where Putrajaya playstheroleoftheJewish lil' David, a good known unscrupulousscoundrelin a biblical tales.
Let me reiterate, a shameful case of Kapar contra Putrajayawouldbe a many OBSCENE case of cheating, as good as a chairperson of a EC should have be sacked for a obvious as good as pure gerrymandering, not which it will occur underneath an UMNOgovernment, which we suppose calls for an additional Malaysia Boleh exclamation.
Let me reiterate, a shameful case of Kapar contra Putrajayawouldbe a many OBSCENE case of cheating, as good as a chairperson of a EC should have be sacked for a obvious as good as pure gerrymandering, not which it will occur underneath an UMNOgovernment, which we suppose calls for an additional Malaysia Boleh exclamation.
But what afterwards has this got to do with my pretension on what we clarity as an upgrading of an aged threat. Before we tuck in to it, let's revisit a few statements by Dr Mahathir in recent weeks.
In my postDeepak, a Cesium Bomb as good as a DevilI wrote of Vell Paari (anak kepadaSamy Vellu) ...lambasting of Dr Mahathir for calling on Najib to give way a latter's budding ministerial post if he fails to secure a two-thirds infancy for BN in GE-13.
I'm not certain either Vell wasbersandiwar-ishly bodekingNajib (you know how MIC pollies have been wakakaka) or he was in fact dissapoint by a difference of a male referred to as a Devil (obviously a One we know, wakakaka).
But we knew Dr Mahathir wasbersandiwara-ing, since in which same post we additionally wrote:
But Dr Mahathir is not an easy or manmanlai male to read. He had virtually co-authoredThe Art of Warwith Sun Tzu, wakakaka, in which his favourite fortify is"All crusade is formed on deception", wakakaka again.
I think Vell Paari has fallen victim to Dr Mahathir's false turn in voicing which unless Najib brings home a (2/3 majority) bacon (figuratively speaking of course, wakakaka), a son of Tun Razak contingency give way his budding ministerial position even if BN wins. [...]
I think Vell Paari has fallen victim to Dr Mahathir's false turn in voicing which unless Najib brings home a (2/3 majority) bacon (figuratively speaking of course, wakakaka), a son of Tun Razak contingency give way his budding ministerial position even if BN wins. [...]
Thus we am prone to hold Dr Mahathir has been playing retreat psychology. [...]
Dr Mahathir knows which a Chinese would be wakeful which it will be a overwhelming effort for Pakatan to win infancy order since of a conspicuous EC, to illustrate he slipped in a preference for them of having either Najib or Muhyiddin as PM.
And he believes a ! Chinese will cite Najib to Muhyiddin as PM, to illustrate he teases them in to choosing by casting votes for BN to safeguard Najib stays as PM. Whether his reversepsychologywill work in accordance with his plansremainsto be seen yet it's still a plan, as good as a really divergent one.
Dr Mahathir knows which a Chinese would be wakeful which it will be a overwhelming effort for Pakatan to win infancy order since of a conspicuous EC, to illustrate he slipped in a preference for them of having either Najib or Muhyiddin as PM.
And he believes a ! Chinese will cite Najib to Muhyiddin as PM, to illustrate he teases them in to choosing by casting votes for BN to safeguard Najib stays as PM. Whether his reversepsychologywill work in accordance with his plansremainsto be seen yet it's still a plan, as good as a really divergent one.
Okay, follow which up with his some-more recent call toAmend constitution to frame Ambiga's citizenship. As reported by Malaysiakini, Dr Mahathir stated:
"To frame a person's citizenship, we need to rectify a constitution. And to rectify a constitution we need two-thirds infancy in Parliament. So, we ask which we give two-thirds infancy to a BN government."
Many took umbrage during what would be deliberate as hisseditiouscall to frame a Malaysian of her citizenship for no alternative reason than partisan domestic purpose. And whilst we should slap his wrist for raising such an issue, his real aim was some-more destined towards a BN (or UMNO) winning GE-13 by a two-third majority, rsther than than forthepurposeofaltering a Constitution to 'fix' Ambiga.
Yes, he is positively pulling pushing pushing!
Really, it isnotnecessary for BN to win by a two-third infancy to order or for Najib to sojourn as PM, yet by environment such a high aim as good as campaigning for it by fear, loathing as good as self-interest driven stampede, he wants BN to have as pretty gentle a infancy as probable even if it's not 2/3. A win is still a win as good as hallelujah, U! MNO will go on to be a driver of a Malaysian gravytrain
Yes, he is positively pulling pushing pushing!
Really, it isnotnecessary for BN to win by a two-third infancy to order or for Najib to sojourn as PM, yet by environment such a high aim as good as campaigning for it by fear, loathing as good as self-interest driven stampede, he wants BN to have as pretty gentle a infancy as probable even if it's not 2/3. A win is still a win as good as hallelujah, U! MNO will go on to be a driver of a Malaysian gravytrain
While a part about a probability of Najib being ousted by Muhyiddin has been destined during Chinese as good as Indian electorate for them to choose a obtuse disliked UMNO male to be PM,thelatter about stripping Ambiga Sreenivesan of her Malaysian citizenship has beentargetedat a Heartland to promote a 'idea' an UMNO-led supervision with a 2/3 infancy canamendtheConstitutionto get rid of an vitriolic non-Malay, anaci.
He was usually following up on a nauseous butts act, a single of inciting loathing for a non-Malay woman in order to rallythetrue believers totheUMNO banner
And it has to be a Heartland he has been targeting since commonsense tells us a civic areas (minus hardcore UMNO apparatchiks) have been inthe main really pro Ambiga, who's virtually a enchantress to them.
Thus we believe, as good millionsofMalaysians, which a conspicuous EC is workinghandin glove with many others (wakakaka) towards such a really gentle win for UMNO-BN, butthequestion is, apart from aged tricks, usually what brand new tactics does it have to grasp that?
Okay, time for a wee bit oftng k'ooi(ch'ong hei) story.
Many years ago we read a abhorrence story formed on a Chinese observant which a single shouldreally be worried one's instruct might usually come loyal - strange, isn't that, yet thentheChinese have been such divergent people - don't hold me? Go ask Dr Mahathir, wakakaka.
The! story w entsomething identical to this (as far as we can recollect):
A couple had usually a single child, who grew up to be a smashing lovely young man, thepride as good as happiness of his parents. He was smart, intelligent, large as good as a loving son. One day he tragically died in a horrible car accident.
Now peep back a wee bit - a relatives beingthegood folks they were, had once saved a life of a Taoist priest. The beholden priest, deliberate to be a little arrange of a virtuoso or holy man, afterwards sensitive them he would grant them a wish, yet it wasnota instruct for element gains yet a single to help them in their moments of many dire need. At which time, they didn't pay many attention to it, meditative which was usually a wayward of an aged beholden priest.
Sothestory went which after a son was buried, they, being so ravaged by their irreplaceable loss, remembered a Taoist bonus as good as went to see him in recklessness in order to draw on a granted wish.
Even prior to they could discuss it a clergyman what they wanted, he advised them not to instruct for whattheHeavens would hold as forbidden, as good as if they insisted, they would dismay their instruct coming true.
Of march no advice would have deterred them from creation which a single wish, for their son to come back to them. The clergyman sadly told them their wishwouldbegranted. And which night a son returned ... yet in a form they didn't expect ... in his horribly crushed up bloodied as good as hurtful (decomposing) form.
Thus a Chinese claim which a saying"May we find what we have been seeking for"is in reality a curse, in a same way as alternative harmless sounding Chinese sayings have been actually curses, such as"May we live in interesting times"and"May we come toth! eattenti on of important people". Hmmm, bloody respectful yet divergent bastards, wakakaka.
"May we find what we have been seeking ! for"has been deemed as a many serious of a 3 pointed curses ...
... which now brings us to what we in Pakatan have been'looking for'in terms of voting. Didn't we want a hundreds of thousands, if not millions of adults vital abroad to be means to opinion during abroad location?
Haven't we lamented which usually a name group, who we correctly think of expected to be pro UMNO people,havebeen permitted to opinion during abroad centre?
Now, a limited form of abroad choosing by casting votes is authorised as good as which we contingency say, when we learntofit, we shuddered since we knew exactly what would follow - for surelythe EC would never ever do anything to threaten UMNO -au contraire, a conflicting would be true.
Asindicative oftheEC's Boleh-ness, haven't we heard not long ago from Dr Ramasamy (Penang DCM II) which his daughter in UK has turn a purebred abroad voter even yet she did NOT apply to be one?
Yes, abroad choosing by casting votes is not distinct postal voting, yet with military/police postal votes, there's still a grade of accounting as good as tracing. However, with a supposed brand new abroad voters, how will Pakatan be means to snippet theirbono fides?
It'll be a! s bad as , if not worse than, a sellingofcitizenships for votes. Overseas choosing by casting votes is in fact a upgraded hazard of postal voting, something we longed for yet didn't allow fortheremarkable EC's 'structuring'.
And hasn't it been ominous which Ahmad Zahid Hamidi has pre-warnedParties should sojourn receptive if they lose, undoubtedly implying it's meant for Pakatan, since many opine which if UMNO expects to lose, it would not receptive to advice so gracious.
Zahid Hamidi has virtually sensitive us which UMNO will be winning big as good as we wouldnotbe surprised if UMNO regains order in Selangor as it might grasp which by a 'surge' ofsupport from abroad voting, wakakaka.
And whilst we don't expect Pakatan to remove Penang we again cannot dismissthe potentialeffect of a same abroad voting.
Should we accordtheEC with an additional Malaysia Boleh for them wishing us"May we find what we have been seeking for"?
He was usually following up on a nauseous butts act, a single of inciting loathing for a non-Malay woman in order to rallythetrue believers totheUMNO banner
And it has to be a Heartland he has been targeting since commonsense tells us a civic areas (minus hardcore UMNO apparatchiks) have been inthe main really pro Ambiga, who's virtually a enchantress to them.
Thus we believe, as good millionsofMalaysians, which a conspicuous EC is workinghandin glove with many others (wakakaka) towards such a really gentle win for UMNO-BN, butthequestion is, apart from aged tricks, usually what brand new tactics does it have to grasp that?
Okay, time for a wee bit oftng k'ooi(ch'ong hei) story.
Many years ago we read a abhorrence story formed on a Chinese observant which a single shouldreally be worried one's instruct might usually come loyal - strange, isn't that, yet thentheChinese have been such divergent people - don't hold me? Go ask Dr Mahathir, wakakaka.
The! story w entsomething identical to this (as far as we can recollect):
A couple had usually a single child, who grew up to be a smashing lovely young man, thepride as good as happiness of his parents. He was smart, intelligent, large as good as a loving son. One day he tragically died in a horrible car accident.
Now peep back a wee bit - a relatives beingthegood folks they were, had once saved a life of a Taoist priest. The beholden priest, deliberate to be a little arrange of a virtuoso or holy man, afterwards sensitive them he would grant them a wish, yet it wasnota instruct for element gains yet a single to help them in their moments of many dire need. At which time, they didn't pay many attention to it, meditative which was usually a wayward of an aged beholden priest.
Sothestory went which after a son was buried, they, being so ravaged by their irreplaceable loss, remembered a Taoist bonus as good as went to see him in recklessness in order to draw on a granted wish.
Even prior to they could discuss it a clergyman what they wanted, he advised them not to instruct for whattheHeavens would hold as forbidden, as good as if they insisted, they would dismay their instruct coming true.
Of march no advice would have deterred them from creation which a single wish, for their son to come back to them. The clergyman sadly told them their wishwouldbegranted. And which night a son returned ... yet in a form they didn't expect ... in his horribly crushed up bloodied as good as hurtful (decomposing) form.
Thus a Chinese claim which a saying"May we find what we have been seeking for"is in reality a curse, in a same way as alternative harmless sounding Chinese sayings have been actually curses, such as"May we live in interesting times"and"May we come toth! eattenti on of important people". Hmmm, bloody respectful yet divergent bastards, wakakaka.
"May we find what we have been seeking ! for"has been deemed as a many serious of a 3 pointed curses ...
... which now brings us to what we in Pakatan have been'looking for'in terms of voting. Didn't we want a hundreds of thousands, if not millions of adults vital abroad to be means to opinion during abroad location?
Haven't we lamented which usually a name group, who we correctly think of expected to be pro UMNO people,havebeen permitted to opinion during abroad centre?
Now, a limited form of abroad choosing by casting votes is authorised as good as which we contingency say, when we learntofit, we shuddered since we knew exactly what would follow - for surelythe EC would never ever do anything to threaten UMNO -au contraire, a conflicting would be true.
Asindicative oftheEC's Boleh-ness, haven't we heard not long ago from Dr Ramasamy (Penang DCM II) which his daughter in UK has turn a purebred abroad voter even yet she did NOT apply to be one?
Yes, abroad choosing by casting votes is not distinct postal voting, yet with military/police postal votes, there's still a grade of accounting as good as tracing. However, with a supposed brand new abroad voters, how will Pakatan be means to snippet theirbono fides?
It'll be a! s bad as , if not worse than, a sellingofcitizenships for votes. Overseas choosing by casting votes is in fact a upgraded hazard of postal voting, something we longed for yet didn't allow fortheremarkable EC's 'structuring'.
And hasn't it been ominous which Ahmad Zahid Hamidi has pre-warnedParties should sojourn receptive if they lose, undoubtedly implying it's meant for Pakatan, since many opine which if UMNO expects to lose, it would not receptive to advice so gracious.
Zahid Hamidi has virtually sensitive us which UMNO will be winning big as good as we wouldnotbe surprised if UMNO regains order in Selangor as it might grasp which by a 'surge' ofsupport from abroad voting, wakakaka.
And whilst we don't expect Pakatan to remove Penang we again cannot dismissthe potentialeffect of a same abroad voting.
Should we accordtheEC with an additional Malaysia Boleh for them wishing us"May we find what we have been seeking for"?
Posted byKTemoc
! More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment