February 5, 2013
http://www.thejakartapost.com/
Building a ASEAN Political-Security Community
Roby Arya Brata, Jakarta | Opinion |02-05-13
ASEAN member states (AMS) have been confronting challenging domestic as well as confidence issues in a region, together with an arms race, corruption, a growth opening as well as a stroke of it, racial clashes as well as intolerance, tellurian trafficking, tellurian rights abuses, an unlawful drug trade, migration, income laundering, amicable injustice, terrorism, territorial nautical disputes, as well as alternative forms of transnational crimes.
Through domestic as well as confidence growth team-work between a AMS, a ASEAN Political-Security Community (APSC) is institutionally framed to effectively conduct these issues. The APSC constitutes a single of a 3 pillars supporting a ASEAN Community to a single side ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) as well as ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community (ASCC). Under a APSC blueprint, which provides a roadmap as well as timetable, a APSC will be determined by 2015.
Promoting domestic growth formed upon a principles of democracy, a order of law as well as great governance, promotion as well as insurance of tellurian rights as well as fundamental freedoms as inscribed in a ASEAN Charter a APSC, according to a blueprint, will "ensure a people as well as member states of ASEAN live in assent with a single another as well as with a world at large in a just, approved as well as agreeable environment".
However, in a new interview with Channel News Asia, ASEAN's newly-
installed Secretary-General, Le Luong Minh, voiced regard over a delayed swell toward building an ASEAN Community, together with a APSC, by 2015. "We have been not upon track. A lot of work still needs to be done," he said.
One of a major problems stopping a swell of establishing a ASEAN Community as well as a APSC is a delayed gait of resolution as well as program doing by a AMS.
In further to a weak domestic commitment of a AMS, this delayed swell might additionally be attributed to a insufficient energy of a ASEAN Secretariat to coordinate, guard as well as "direct" a policies, programs as well as activities of a ASEAN as well as a AMS in achieving a APSC. With a unsound operational budget, a ASEAN Secretariat functions similar to an ASEAN post or relationship office.
The ASEAN Secretariat cannot scold as well as direct a AMS policies, programs as well as activities from a proposed actions as well as programs programmed in a APSC Blueprint. The ASEAN Summit, as a highest decision-making body, is additionally weak in enforcing as well as "punishing" a AMS to imitate with a rules, principles, as well as purposes contained in a ASEAN Charter.
Moreover, a new conflicts inspiring a AMS show which a institutional horizon of a APSC is weak in solution disputes as well as progressing assent in a region. The cases of a South China Sea as well as Cambodia-Thailand territorial disputes, trans-boundary mist wickedness as well as Rohingya tellurian rights issues demonstrate how such an institutional horizon is not effective in handling as well as solution a problems.
"To maintain as well as raise peace, confidence as well as fortitude in a region", as stipulated in Article 1 of a ASEAN Charter, a institutional as well as authorised horizon of a APSC should be strengthened. The ASEAN Charter should be reviewed to give some-more energy to a ASEAN Secretary-General to action not usually as a relationship! officer , but additionally as a coordinating "minister" for ASEAN Community as well as unfamiliar affairs. He or she as well as a ASEAN Secretariat would duty as a policy-coordinating as well as policy-making body. However, this Secretariat might additionally propose new policies or revisions to a ASEAN Summit for approval.
As a "foreign minister" of a ASEAN, a Secretary-General might additionally action as an surrogate to solve a conflicts as well as disputes between a AMS. For instance, in a case of a ASEAN's failure as well as discord in making a joint communiqu upon a South China Sea brawl at a Phnom Penh Summit last year, he should have finished "shuttle diplomacy" to finalise a conflicts.
ASEAN cannot rest upon an AMS unfamiliar minister to take a initiative for behaving upon such preventive diplomacy. In such an event, what if a Indonesian Foreign Minister Marty Natalegawa or alternative qualified tall officials from a AMS were not willing to take a initiative to solve a disproportion or alternative forms of opposing interests? The Secretary-General, therefore, should be empowered to do a job.
To make firm democracy, raise great governance as well as a order of law as well as protect tellurian rights as well as fundamental freedoms, a domestic as well as authorised team-work underneath a APSC plans should be written as well as destined to "integrate" a domestic as well as authorised systems of a AMS. For this purpose, ASEAN should adopt strong conventions upon anti-corruption as well as great governance, nautical disputes, environmental protection, tellurian trafficking, unlawful drug trade, extradition as well as mutual authorised assistance, income laundering as well as alternative forms of transnational crimes.
To make these conventions, ASEAN must have a justice which has a energy to arbitrate disputes between a AMS as well as punish (transnational) crimes committed in ASEAN's jurisdiction. Therefore, to make this justice work effectively, a AMS should delicately as wel! l as obv iously redefine as well as reinterpret a scope as well as definitions of "sovereignty", "non-interference", as well as "territorial integrity" principles stipulated in a ASEAN Charter.
The bard is an international law as well as policy researcher at a Cabinet Secretariat of Indonesia. The views expressed have been his own.
Read More @ SourceMore Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
No comments:
Post a Comment