Why is the court trying to block Rosli from giving his statement?


What is it which a court is perplexing to block Rosli from revealing? How will Rosli's sworn matter hurt those who travel in a corridors of power? We should be endangered about what they have been perplexing to repudiate us from knowing, not about exploiting issues for domestic gain.
THE CORRIDORS OF POWER
Raja Petra Kamarudin
Someone asked me given we no longer bother to expose a wrongdoings of those who travel in a corridors of power, in sold those wrongdoings by a Barisan Nasional government.
Well, first of all, in a past, we was a usually one we do this. For 8 years given August 2004 as well as for five years prior to which given 1999 we have been fighting a lone conflict divulgence a excesses as well as transgressions of those who travel in a corridors of power. And a military have raided my residence as well as confiscated documents as well as computers from my residence no reduction than half a dozen times. we have additionally been incarcerated though trial twice as well as arrested as well as charged a couple some-more times given of my 'crimes'.
Today, we have most prominent people we do which job. So do we still need me to do that? We have Rafizi Ramli, P. Balasubramanian, Deepak Jaikishan, ex-IGP Musa Hassan, ex-Kuala Lumpur CID Chief Mat Zain, Ex-CCID Chief Ramli Yussuf, ex-Health Minister Chua Jui Meng, ex-Umno activists such as Aspan Alias as well as Mohd Ariff Sabri who assimilated DAP, ex-Umno Sabah leaders such as Lajim Ukin, Wilfred Bumburing, Dr Ibrahim Menudin as well as Yahya Lampong, as well as many, most more.
In short, there have been scores of people right away we do a pursuit we used to do. And most of these people have been whistleblowers. They used to be partial of a hurtful complement as well as right away the! y have b een divulgence insider information. Who improved to expose these shenanigans than people who were once partial of which hurtful system? Certainly they would have first-hand information which we do not have.
Secondly, for some-more than 13 years given 1999 (eight of those years withMalaysia Today) we have been divulgence liaison after liaison though zero was finished about a matter. More importantly, we did not exhibit these scandals AFTER they had happened similar to all a others. we suggested them BEFORE they happened so which something could be finished about them, a arrange of pre-emption strike. But zero was finished about a have a disproportion as well as what we warned would occur unequivocally happened in a end.
What is a indicate with screaming after a equine has bolted? You need to tighten a stable door prior to a equine bolts. Closing it after a equine has bolted is no full of blood good. And this is what most of we do. You roar after it happens. When we exhibit it prior to it happens we do nothing. And afterwards we ask me given we do not speak about it.
What is a indicate of talking about something after it happens when we do zero about a have a disproportion when we speak about if prior to it happens? What a garland of idiots we have as readers. Waste of full of blood time perplexing to teach you. Better we just sit behind as well as watch Pakatan Rakyat get whacked in a coming ubiquitous choosing as well as afterwards write my "I told we so" article.
Malaysia Todayrevealed which George Kent was starting to get a Ampang LRT plan ONE YEAR prior to it was awarded to them. What was finished about it? Now which it has already been awarded to George Kent we have so much noise as well as Rafizi Ramli binds press discussion after press conference.
For what? For syok sendiri is it? we even suggested who Tan Kay Hock is as well as his links to Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak two years prior to a proclamation of a p! roject. And what did we do? Nothing!
Malaysia Todayrevealed which a company associated to a ex-Chief Justice as well as Umno lawyer was starting to get a RM2.2 billion Kinrara-Damansara Expressway (Kidex) plan BEFORE it was awarded to them.
And what was finished about it? You waited until a plan was awarded to them as well as afterwards we have so much noise. For what? For syok sendiri is it?
Years agoMalaysia Todayexposed a RM8 billion MAS fiasco as well as additionally suggested how this have a disproportion is associated to a RM30 billion Forex disaster of twenty years ago.Malaysia Todayalso suggested a contents of Tajudin Ramli's Affidavit where he admitted which his takeover of MAS is associated to a Forex emanate as well as was a move to camouflage this scandal.
And what was finished about it? Now a have a disproportion has been settled out of court so which a law stays hidden. And right away we scream. For what? For syok sendiri is it?
Remember behind in 2006-2007Malaysia Todayrevealed a links in between a military as well as a underworld? Remember my article'All Roads lead to Putrajaya'? Today, everyone is singing a strain about how a military have been associated to a underworld. And a lead singer in this chorus is a ex-IGP himself, a head of a black market in a military force. And we all roar what a great guy he is as well as which he should be a Pakatan Rakyat candidate in a coming ubiquitous election.
What bullshit! What a garland of losers we all are! we unequivocally hope which Barisan Nasional wins a ubiquitous choosing so which we can have a wish of seeing your faces when we write my "I told we so" article.
A month ago we wrote a inform called'No, it is not over yet'. (READ HERE). And what did we do abou! t it? No w review theMalaysiakininews inform next called'Jan 3 preference upon AG's conflict to Rosli's revelation'.
Yes, lawyer Rosli Dahlan is being bound up by Malaysia's authorised system. And we wrote about it a month ago as well as zero was finished about a matter. On Thursday this week, 3rd Jan 2013, Rosli is starting to turn yet another of a most victims of Malaysia's hurtful authorised system.
Do we care? Will any one do something about it? Will Rosli humour a same predestine as a most who came prior to Malaysia's authorised complement as well as were denied justice? Or will we just wait until it happens so which we can feat this whole thing for domestic gain?
we think we wish it to happen. we think we wish Rosli to humour injustice. And afterwards when it happens we can use this partial as an choosing issue. You do not caring about justice. You just wish to use misapplication as a domestic emanate as well as to win votes. You wish people to humour so which we can win a election.
What is it which a court is perplexing to block Rosli from revealing? How will Rosli's sworn matter hurt those who travel in a corridors of power? We should be endangered about what they have been perplexing to repudiate us from knowing, not about exploiting issues for domestic gain.
We should come out as well as advise a judge which upon 3rd Jan 2013 if they repudiate Rosli probity afterwards expect our wrath. We should have sure which Rosli receives probity as well as not hope which he suffers misapplication so which we can use which as an choosing issue.
Okay, review (below) what have been a secrets which they have been perplexing to keep a secret. They wish to block Rosli from testifying as well as additionally wish to obliterate his Affidavit so which Malaysians will never find a truth. ButMalaysia Todayis starting to exhibit a law anyway whether they block it or not.
And which is a p! ursuit o fMalaysia Today. We exhibit a untold story. We engage in pre-emption strikes. Our pursuit is not to feat issues for domestic benefit as well as to win elections.
And which is what makesMalaysia Todayfar improved than all a others. We exhibit secrets to teach you. Others do so to win votes. And idiots do not know a difference. Are we one of those idiots? Chances have been we are.
**********************************************
Jan 3 preference upon AG's conflict to Rosli's revelation
Hafiz Yatim, Malaysiakini
In a wicked twist, a Kuala Lumpur High Court yesterday refused to accede to Rosli Dahlan time to file an confirmation in reply to a Attorney-General's duplicate to mislay sure paragraphs in a lawyer's acknowledgement matter per a 'Copgate' affair.
The comparison sovereign warn in a case had usually endorsed an confirmation submitted upon Thursday to oppose Rosli's acknowledgement matter as well as open sworn matter in court.
What was rare in a comparison sovereign warn Azizan Md Arshad's duplicate was which he had deposed it himself, whereas it is usual use for a confirmation to be finished by another comparison officer.
In a affidavit, a AG's Chambers reproduced all of Rosli's statements, which it opposed, making them public.
Despite this, Justice Hue Siew Kheng refused to accede to Rosli time to contention his affidavit-in-reply to Azizan's application, ordering a parties to contention yesterday afternoon in her chambers.
Justice Hue afterwards bound Wednesday for a preference upon a AG's Chamber's conflict to obliterate sure paragraphs.
On November 28 it was reported which a AG's Chambers, representing a Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission's prototype a Anti-Corruption Agency as well as a government, had opposite Rosli's duplicate to review out his acknowledgement matter as w! ell as a dditionally longed for expunged sure portions of it associated to Copgate as well as other matters.
The Copgate event involved former inspector-general of military (IGP) Musa Hassan as well as attorney-general Abdul Gani Patail alleged to be a hidden hands in providing protection to an black market figure declared Goh Cheng Poh, additionally known as Tengku Goh.
At a prior session, Justice Hue had authorised Rosli to review out his acknowledgement matter in open court, which had been bound for Jan 25 during a conference of a RM50 million suit.
'Goh's detain noticed as unfriendly act'
Rosli, in his command filed in 2009, had described a hostile relationship in between former Commercial Crime Investigation Department director Ramli Yusuff as well as Musa, as well as how a IGP had used a ACA as well as a AG's Chambers to implicate him as well as Ramli in a arise of Goh's arrest.
Rosli pronounced he acted for Ramli as well as a then-deputy home minister Johari Baharom opposite Goh's habeas corpus duplicate in 2007, after a AG's Chambers reneged upon drawing up their affidavits.
The lawyer claimed which Musa saw Goh's detain as an action of disloyalty upon Ramli's part, resulting in a IGP initiating serve ACA investigations opposite him, to illustrate straining a Musa, Ramli as well as Johari relationship.
Rosli additionally claimed which he warranted Musa's rage as well as which of a attorney-general's when he drew up a affidavits for Ramli as well as Johari, triggering a ACA examine opposite him as well as his subsequent arrest.
He pronounced an ACA military officer kicked his leg, disfigured his arms as well as handcuffed him tightly, resulting in lacerations as well as flourishing of his wrists.
He gave his matter during a ACA headquarters, though was hold overnight as well as taken to court as well as charged upon a eve of Hari Raya, upon October 27, 2007.
!
T hese were antagonistic actions out to tarnish his image, he combined in his writ.
However, a KL Sessions Court had acquitted Rosli though calling his defence, upon a assign of not complying with a agency's procedures to acknowledgement his assets.
The prosecution had withdrawn the appeal opposite a exculpation progressing this year.
*******************************************
WHAT THEY DON'T WANT US TO KNOW
Read More @ Source



More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz

No comments: