Robert Phang's Statutory Declaration

Robert PhangRosli

We have witnessed the essay of quite the few memorable statutory declarations in the final decade or so: RPK's upon how Rosmah Mansor was privately involved in C4-ing Altantuya, PI Bala's SD that contradicted PI Bala's SD, the SD by VK Lingam's hermit opposite VK Lingam ...

Robert Phang's SD, in my opinion, joins this special group essentially because of who he was (a member of the MACC) as well as who the SD is aimed during (the MACC).

I don't know about you guys though when he received the letter from Rosli Dahlan, Tan Sri Phang should have lodged the report to the authorities to protect his own reputation. He did not do this as well as this has lifted the kind of oddity - in my mind, of march - as to what his attribute with Rosli Dahlan essentially was.

Was he compromised/Did he compromise his in front of by privately perplexing (promising?) to help the chairman that was being investigated by the police as well as the MACC? Were there mins of his review with Abu Kassim upon the make the difference or was it the in isolation conversation?

Abu Kassim, MACC chief

The SD connects the lot of large players: Rosli Dahlan was the lawyer of former Director of Commercial Crimes Ramli Yusof upon more occasions than one. The two were classmates during UIA as well as Ramli, by Rosli's own admission, was perceived to be an Anwar Ibrahim supporter. Ramli as well as Robert Phang were in the news recently, both attacking former IGP Musa Hassan. Musa as well as Ramli are what we called sworn enemies. Rosli is suing the fibre of people, together with the Malaysian Government. Robert Phang give up the MACC after blogs indicted him of trying to bribe the former Home Ministry's secretary-general, that he had denied vehemently. The alternative dude whom he named in the SD - the Attorney-General Gani Patail - can be related to all the above.

His SD is not the coincidence. It was calcualted. But to do what?