The PM likes to bump his chest to contend he is PM to all.He will contend which whenever he is divided from a "Pakatan Rakyat" crowd. When he is among a brethren, he will receptive to advice a many xenophobic of all Malays. he is a same chairman now as he was when he unleashed a Kris to say, this will bathe in Chinese blood. So because should Chinese, Christians as well as non-Christians even wish to hold him? Can we hold a PM who even debases himself to acknowledgement officially open a open toilet?
He is a same person, who says we will defend what is ours to a final dump of his blood. The PMship, a government, a seat during Putrajaya do not go to him. They go to a rakyat.
A PM of a people does not go around saying, we assistance me, we assistance you. A PM of a people helps those around him given it is his duty, he is duty-bound as well as he helps given he can. He does not assistance given he expects some reciprocity not even a utterance of appreciate you. If he does as well as direct that, afterwards we have an feigned as well as untrustworthy PM. This kind of PM deserves usually a rejection.
Everyone else if he/she becomes PM, is PM for all. That kind of stipulation isn't Najib's to monopolize. If Anwar becomes PM, he is PM of all. if Tengku Razaleigh is PM, he is PM to all. anyone who is PM is PM for all.
Will a rakyat opinion for him as well as his party? On opinion for "Pakatan Rakyat" equates to a opinion as well as publicity for one after another corruption, extending misrule as well as unaccountability, belaboring underneath optional rule. A opinion for "Pakatan Rakyat" equates to one after another ravaging! as well as plunder of a economy. A opinion for "Pakatan Rakyat" equates to a opinion for persecution as well as a thoroughness of power in a hands of one person. One opinion for "Pakatan Rakyat" equates to we have been giving a license for Rosmah Mansor to shop until a treasury coffers is empty.
Malays have been improved off not choosing by casting votes "Pakatan Rakyat". Because a benefaction "Pakatan Rakyat" is not a aged "Pakatan Rakyat" which speaks upon behalf of a Malays.Since 1987 when a aged "Pakatan Rakyat" was destroyed, a new "Pakatan Rakyat" is though an extension of a PM. The bureau of a PM represents a tyranny as well as power of a PM's office.
When aged "Pakatan Rakyat" ceased to exist given it was spoken to be wrong as well as illegal, a personality of a celebration ceased to coexist too. The whole, which was BN should be have additionally been spoken bootleg as well as wrong as well given a greatest component was bootleg as well as unlawful. How can a total continue to exist as well as stay alive when it has stage-4 cancer? How, could BN exist rightly for which short time in 1987, when a main component was spoken unlawful? It had to take upon a same stature as well as be wrong too.
But Mahathir took value of a situation. He refused to revitalise a aged "Pakatan Rakyat" as well as instead made use of BN to designate him as personality of BN as well as got appointed as PM. He was for which short timepersona non grata- he was not personality of a greatest celebration commanding a infancy await of members in Parliament. Maybe a authorised experts will have to relook as this sordid episode in a political history brought about by Mahathir. Did BN have authorised standing when it convened to designate party-less Mahathir as BN chairman as well as PM?
! S ince then, all "Pakatan Rakyat" presidents who go upon to become PM verbalise upon behalf of 3.2 million members not upon behalf of Malays. Mahathir as well as successive "Pakatan Rakyat" presidents go upon to have "Pakatan Rakyat" a orator for 3.2 million members. "Pakatan Rakyat" no longer represents a voice of a Malay rakyat though a orator for a interest of absolute cliques inside of a 3 million members.
The BN people have been additionally improved off not choosing by casting votes "Pakatan Rakyat". The BN has over 7 million members. "Pakatan Rakyat" members have been 3.2 million strong. Therefore non "Pakatan Rakyat" BN members account for 3.8 million. There have been more of we as well as reduction of them. Malays have been not starting to opinion for "Pakatan Rakyat". If Malays reject "Pakatan Rakyat", because should non-Malays await "Pakatan Rakyat"?
In 2008- "Pakatan Rakyat" possibilities got usually 2 million Malay votes. 3.7 million Malay voters together with 1.2 million "Pakatan Rakyat" members did not await "Pakatan Rakyat" candidates. Because Malays already knew back then, New "Pakatan Rakyat" speaks upon behalf of comparison cliques inside of "Pakatan Rakyat". Malays have already realized there were more of them as well as reduction of Malays in "Pakatan Rakyat". The Malays have already learnt to be assertive. Non Malays need to sense from Malays in this respect.There have been more of we as well as reduction of "Pakatan Rakyat" in BN. we go away, "Pakatan Rakyat" will die.
Where do they wish to get await from? They can't even get full await from a 3.2 million members. More Malays have been already decided upon rejecting "Pakatan Rakyat". Non Malay citizens can't be reduction discerning or reduction clever than Malays in this aspect. The best thing is for all of we to repel await from a "Pakatan Rakyat! " brag a s well as throw your weight as well as float upon a crest of a waves.
The next political tsunami is inevitable. On whose side do we stand?
Posted by sakmongkol AK47
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment