Moga tahun ini
lebih baik
dari tahun sebelumnya...
wasalam
Zaid Ibrahim upon Islam as well as secular politics...
The following is a second of a two-part speak with former de facto law minister as well as ex-Parti Kita chief Zaid Ibrahim.Part one
Pakatan has positioned itself as a 'moderate' voice of Islam. As a strategic move, do we consider it would be improved to remain wordless or clearly state positions even though it might result in blowback from a nonconformist elements, namely a propaganda mouthpiece as well as politicians of Umno?
Whether Pakatan is a moderate voice, we have to wait as well as see. The exam is not either they concede non-Muslims sufficient freedom; that's easy, though either they will be "moderate" to Muslims.
I regularly hold it's improved to state a right positions clearly as well as unambiguously upon core delicate issues even if it equates to we have to "lose" a litt! le await in a beginning. Politics is not usually winning; though about we do a right thing. Long-term goals have been equally important.
What do we consider of (PKR vice-president) Nurul (Izzah Anwar)'s comments upon Islam as well as what have been your own views upon a subject (of compulsion as well as Malay identity)?
Islam in Malaysia will not concede a Malay to be a non-Muslim. Some Islamic scholars however contend that there is no compulsion in a religion. But scholars have no shift in Malaysia; usually religious bureaucrats.Nurul is dauntless to demonstrate an op! inion; though in Malaysia, Muslims have no right to an perspective upon their own religion. They can be punished. Only a state can emanate opinions.
Do we hold that Islam has intruded in to a public sphere at a responsibility of democratic principles?
It's not Islam that has intruded in to public sphere. It is a proponent of tyranny as well as fascist leaders that have used sacrament to carry out a apparatus of a state. Democracy as well as a order of law have been involved when we concede such leaders to go upon to rule.
Communal issues have been vital issues of a domestic routine here; do we consider that Pakatan has finished sufficient to shift this paradigm?
Pakatan plan is pure - do not speak too most about difficult issues; let's get to energy first. So that's how it will be. Whilst that is not a proceed we would take, we recognise that governing body need most opposite approaches to succeed.
I usually hope that when they get to power; they will not forget that most hard decisions have to be made. If they afterwards pronounced we will wait to win a second tenure before we do! them; a fterwards we contend let's remove them.
So yes, they have not come up with concrete plans to shift a domestic model of a country.
Is there a disproportion in between a secular governing body of BN as well as Pakatan?
Racial governing body in BN is pure as well as obvious led by Umno, whereas secular governing body in Pakatan have been more diffused as well as somewhat easeful by sacrament as well as meritocracy.
What is your perspective upon certain movement programmes as well as do we consider it nurtures a enlightenment of entitlement?
Affirmative programmes delicately structured as well as guided by pure ideology as well as good governance can be a utilitarian tool to assistance a poor as well as a marginalised community.
The complaint we have is that a Malays no longer see certain policie! s as priv! ileges to be given upon a need basis; though as their rights. Which Malay leaders we have right away who will dare to explain to them otherwise?
Do we consider that certain movement programmes contributed to a ghettoisation of a public as well as in isolation sectors along secular lines?
The complaint we have is a inability of a little leaders to see a long-term attribution effects of discrimination. They wish present gratification as well as await as well as so they tell a Malays they have special rights. When we take that path, we afterwards will not see we have been putting in use discrimination.Only enlightened Malay leaders can tell a disproportion in between outright taste as well as certain await programmes. The Chinese afterwards retaliate as well as would gang up as well as await each other, thereby creation a situation worse.
It's u! sually a Indians as well as alternative locals who have been left alone; desolate as well as poor.
A recent consult highlighted a secular taste practices of a in isolation sector. Do we consider that it is a role of supervision by legislation to even a personification field in a in isolation sector?
Discrimination in a workplace is prevalent in a country. It's to be expected that when a Malay-led supervision practices taste in a public service, there will be a identical reply in a Chinese-dominated in isolation sector.
A responsible supervision must take all stairs to finish discrimination; otherwise, Malaysia will never achieve a true potential. It might even boar a see! ds of fut! ure instability. Legislation is required for this purpose.
What is a a single piece of legislation that is desperately indispensable in Malaysia?
If there is a single piece of legislation we indispensable most, it's a Freedom of Information Act. When governments can work under privacy as they do now, crime as well as abuse of energy will continue, in any case who comes to power.
It's usually when a leaders know a rakyat can see what they have been we do will things improve.
How does a initiate domestic celebration similar to Kita tarry in a celebrity driven domestic scene when a star captivate has stepped down from a presidency?
Kita is a new party. Its survival similar to all alternative domestic parties depends upon a domestic beliefs. The celebration is structured differently. We don't have a president. We have a celebration chief who can be anyone of a twenty-five central cabinet members.I have explained that we wish to be spared a charge of managing a organisation as well ! as focus more upon a development of domestic ideas. we am not stepping down, usually we do opposite things.
Writer's epilogue
That aged proverb that we judge a man by his actions not words is indictment as well as praise for a politician similar to Zaid. Against Umno, he stranded to his ideology when it mattered as well as suffered a consequences for his action, that puts him in a joining of those Pakatan leaders who have finished a same.
However, he also engaged in an unnecessary bloodletting with his form! er comrad! es that gave ammunition to a current system of administration in a vendetta against any who mount in a way. The real question is not either Zaid has burnt his bridges though either he will be authorised to set up newones.-S Thayaparan,malaysiakini
cheers.
Posted byali allah ditta
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment