November 4, 2012
Hindraf as well as PKR: The Twain has met
by Terence Netto (11-03-12)@www.malaysiakini.com
COMMENT At final the twain has met. Hindraf as well as PKR have gotten together, almost.Realism has seemingly won out over quasi-separatism, the suggestion of collaboration based upon usual objectives over the self-defeating go-it-alone attitude driven by quixotic impulses.
The headlines which Hindraf's P Wathyamoorthy (left) did meet up with PKR adviser Anwar Ibrahim progressing this week as well as had the "fruitful" discussion, ought to come as the service to those who from day the single were concerned which the quasi-separatism of aspects of the Hindraf bulletin would see them marooned upon the banks of the stream of inhabitant domestic remodel rsther than than swimming in the currents.
The push for reform, galvanised by the reformasi transformation of fourteen years ago which sprung from the travails of Anwar, was took off by the impressive Hindraf proof of November 25, 2007 in the streets of Kuala Lumpur.
Anwar ingeniously harnessed the energy generated by which signal event to propel the opposition confederation he led to the ancestral denial of the two-thirds majority to the statute BN as well as the stripping of the aura of invincibility during the 12th general election.
However, given which domestic landscape changing achievement of Mar 2008 as well as following the release from ISA control of 5 of the movement's some-more famous activists, conflicting aims as well as inharmonious pathways prevented Hindraf from creation usual means with PKR, the celebration which is the judicious ! car for the achievement of Indian Malaysian aspirations.
The greatest barrier to Hindraf's creation usual means with PKR was the quasi-separatism of aspects of the former's socio-economic agenda. This quasi-separatism stemmed from Hindraf's explain which the plight of Indian Malaysians compulsory the race-specific programme of upliftment. PKR disagreed. They argued which the Malaysian nation has to get away from race-specific as well as move to need-based programmes of poverty eradication.
Indian poverty like Malay, Chinese, Dayak as well as Kadazandusun penury would be improved alleviated, contended PKR, by need-based programmes of upliftment rsther than than race-specific ones.
Thus the nub of the socioeconomic bulletin propounded by PKR militated against the approach espoused by Hindraf.
Acrimonious exchanges
In the past 4 years, this has been the focal point of the cove in in between 
Hindraf as well as PKR, exacerbated, upon occasion, by the bitterness of the verbal exchanges in in between the Hindu rights movement's principal interlocutor, P Uthayakumar (right), as well as various exponents of the means of poor Indians in PKR, DAP and, even, in Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM).
At times, these exchanges were so acrimonious, the hope which usual means could be done in in between Hindraf as well as the rest of the Malaysian opposition appeared reedy as well as forlorn.
Things got worse when Uthayakumar began espousing the need for Indians to move their voter registrations to constituencies where their numbers would then be poignant enough to influence victory.
He deduced which with this migration, something like 17 parliamentary as well as 35 state seats, enabled by Indian confed! eration votes, would furnish results which would garner for the competition electoral power.
This was the harebrained scheme though it enjoyed what the German historian of ideas GF Hegel called "negative activity" the fanaticism of the abstract which assaults the tangible without having in mind any practical skeleton for improving the actual. In politics, Hegel argued, such "negative activity", whatever the motivation, always ends up serving the practical domestic purpose.
It's tough to see where the practical domestic purpose in Uthayakumar's plan for Indian electoral empowerment lay, though when Ambiga Sreneevasan (above) emerged, in the past two years, as the principal leader of BERSIH, the electoral remodel advocacy group that's been pushing in the final 5 years for the clean-up of the electoral rolls, the mental dynamics of Indian electoral empowerment changed.
Ambiga came out of left field as well as surged, in the non-politically partisan way, to tip the ratings in open advocacy of the only means by reasoned argument as well as dignified deportment.
This was the debate de force which subtly cut the ground from underneath Hindraf's feet
in approach which contingency have been perplexing to them though was not to 'middle' Indian Malaysians. They wish to be part of the inhabitant mainstream, not quasi-separate from it, as envisaged by the thrust of the Hindraf agenda.
The carriage as well as content of Ambiga's career is the antecedent which Indians wish for their young kids to obey which was why, after her emergence, Hindraf as well as their bulletin of quasi-separatism fast waned.
Their energetic ! informat ion arch S Jayathas (right) was the quickest to recognise this as well as enlisted with PKR final month.
With his joining PKR, the avoidable alienation of the final 4 years in in between Hindraf as well as PKR will fast unfreeze as well as right away with the some-more flexible Waythamoorthy meeting up with Anwar, the collaboration in in between healthy allies can re-begin.
This is an entente which will be salvific for Indians as well as save them from fatuous digression.
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
No comments:
Post a Comment