The Shah Alam High Court has inspected a six-year prison judgment as well as a RM400,000 excellent handed to Sabak Bernam MP Abdul Rahman Bakri as well as his help Rosli Busro for creation fake claims.
Judge Akhtar Tahir primarily ordered for thesentenceto be carried out immediately, but a counterclaim group managed to disagree for a stay of executionlate this evening.
However, a bail volume for Abdul Rahman has been increasing from RM50,000 to RM80,000.
The indicted will have a last possibility to disagree for their freedom at a Court of Appeal leve.
On Mar 1, Sessions Court Judge Azhaniz Teh Azman Teh had handed down a judgment after finding Abdul Rahman as well as Rosli guilty of 8 charges of creation fake claims for programmes which never took place, amounting to RM80,000.
Abdul Rahman (right) was indicted of committing a offence before 2008, when he was then a Sungai Air Tawar state assemblyperson, whilst Rosli was indicted of aiding him.
Abdul Rahman (right) was indicted of committing a offence before 2008, when he was then a Sungai Air Tawar state assemblyperson, whilst Rosli was indicted of aiding him. According toBernama, Judge Akhtar ruling had dismissed a counterclaim counsel's evidence which statements from dual pass witnesses - Mohd Harmizar Sulaiman as well as Rizam Ismail - should not be accepted by a justice on drift which they were accomplices.
"I have read a statements by a dual witnesses as well as we don't consider them to be accomplices. They have been followers or people who follow whatever sought by a first indicted (Abdul Rahman) as well ! as a sec ond indicted (Rosli).
"Even if both witnesses were accomplices, their statements were corroborated by statements from other independent witnesses.
"Because of this, it is my perspective which a Sessions Court decider did not have a inapplicable designation in revelation statements from both witnesses. It is clear from their statements which a indicted dictated to have a fake claim," pronounced a judge.
"I have read a statements by a dual witnesses as well as we don't consider them to be accomplices. They have been followers or people who follow whatever sought by a first indicted (Abdul Rahman) as well ! as a sec ond indicted (Rosli).
"Even if both witnesses were accomplices, their statements were corroborated by statements from other independent witnesses.
"Because of this, it is my perspective which a Sessions Court decider did not have a inapplicable designation in revelation statements from both witnesses. It is clear from their statements which a indicted dictated to have a fake claim," pronounced a judge.
'It was a fake claim'
Akhtar pronounced a have a difference was proven when a monies perceived were not used for their dictated purposes as well as were instead used for personal matters.
"The counterclaim warn also submitted which a claims were not fake since a programmes were hold but not in a areas settled in a claims. However, we am some-more prone to state it was a fake claim.
"In this appeal, we am confident which a Sessions Court decider did not have any inapplicable designation in finding a dual indicted guilty of all charges as well as a judgment is commensurate with a crime as well as a in front of hold by both accused.
"In perspective of this, a interest against a self-assurance as well as a judgment is denied as well as judgment upheld," pronounced a judge.
Abdul Rahman as well as Rosli have been represented by Muhammad Shafee Abdullah as well as Badrul Munir Mohd Bukhari, whilst a respondents have been represented by Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission charge unit chief Abdul Razak Musa as well as emissary public prosecutor Mohd Zaki Salleh.
"The counterclaim warn also submitted which a claims were not fake since a programmes were hold but not in a areas settled in a claims. However, we am some-more prone to state it was a fake claim.
"In this appeal, we am confident which a Sessions Court decider did not have any inapplicable designation in finding a dual indicted guilty of all charges as well as a judgment is commensurate with a crime as well as a in front of hold by both accused.
"In perspective of this, a interest against a self-assurance as well as a judgment is denied as well as judgment upheld," pronounced a judge.
Abdul Rahman as well as Rosli have been represented by Muhammad Shafee Abdullah as well as Badrul Munir Mohd Bukhari, whilst a respondents have been represented by Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission charge unit chief Abdul Razak Musa as well as emissary public prosecutor Mohd Zaki Salleh.
Abdul Rahman, 47, was indicted of regulating dubious claims papers to obtain allocations for a series of programmes which never took place.
He was charged with committing a 8 offences at a Sabak Bernam district bureau in between Jan 21 as well as Feb 12 in 2008.
Under Section 11(c) as well as Section 16 of a Anti-Corruption Act 1997, Abdul Rahman can be locked up up to up 20 years as well as fined not less than 5 times a worth involved ! or RM10, 000, yes or no is higher, on conviction.
Rosli, 44, is indicted of being an accomplice in all a charges.
In May 2008, Menteri Besar Khalid Ibrahimtoldthe state legislative assembly which 90.2 percent of a RM29,542,000.09 grant by a state government for a year been disbursed before March.
After Pakatan Rakyat took over a administration of Selangor in March, state assemblypersons found which a allocations, RM500,000 for each constituency, hadmostly been used up.
At a time, Pakatan indicted BN of abusing a supports for electioneering.
Read More @ Source He was charged with committing a 8 offences at a Sabak Bernam district bureau in between Jan 21 as well as Feb 12 in 2008.
Under Section 11(c) as well as Section 16 of a Anti-Corruption Act 1997, Abdul Rahman can be locked up up to up 20 years as well as fined not less than 5 times a worth involved ! or RM10, 000, yes or no is higher, on conviction.
Rosli, 44, is indicted of being an accomplice in all a charges.
In May 2008, Menteri Besar Khalid Ibrahimtoldthe state legislative assembly which 90.2 percent of a RM29,542,000.09 grant by a state government for a year been disbursed before March.
After Pakatan Rakyat took over a administration of Selangor in March, state assemblypersons found which a allocations, RM500,000 for each constituency, hadmostly been used up.
At a time, Pakatan indicted BN of abusing a supports for electioneering.
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment