Former inspector-general of military Musa Hassan was never rebuilt to go for hearing in his defamation fit opposite antithesis personality Anwar Ibrahim in a first place.
This make a difference became strong when Musa had problems of anticipating his categorical warn after Hisyam Teh Poh Teik as well as Ghazi Ishak pronounced they could not crop up for him upon which day.
Furthermore, Musa's declare list was seen as deficient prior to a start of a hearing as upon top of a former IGP testifying as a claimant, he had placed former Kuala Lumpur CID chief Mat Zain Ibrahim as his second witness.
Mat Zain toldMalaysiakinithat he was surprised which Musa had listed him as his second witness.
"I was never subpoenaed nor sensitive by Musa or any of his warn about his intention to call me or jot down my matter to hope for a declare statement. we believe what Anwar's warn pronounced is right, which they did not find a settlement.
"It was Musa who lied to a open as well as motionless to withdraw. Musa never longed for a box to go upon to proceed with," claimed a vocal Mat Zain, a former black-eye box investigating officer.
This make a difference became strong when Musa had problems of anticipating his categorical warn after Hisyam Teh Poh Teik as well as Ghazi Ishak pronounced they could not crop up for him upon which day.
Furthermore, Musa's declare list was seen as deficient prior to a start of a hearing as upon top of a former IGP testifying as a claimant, he had placed former Kuala Lumpur CID chief Mat Zain Ibrahim as his second witness.Mat Zain toldMalaysiakinithat he was surprised which Musa had listed him as his second witness.
"I was never subpoenaed nor sensitive by Musa or any of his warn about his intention to call me or jot down my matter to hope for a declare statement. we believe what Anwar's warn pronounced is right, which they did not find a settlement.
"It was Musa who lied to a open as well as motionless to withdraw. Musa never longed for a box to go upon to proceed with," claimed a vocal Mat Zain, a former black-eye box investigating officer.
Anwar's warn N Surendran had toldMalaysiakinion a day of a hearing which Mat Zain was supposed to be their witness, prior to guidance which Musa had applied for a former KL CID chief to be his much earlier.
Mat Zain longed fo! r action to be taken opposite Musa as well as present attorney-general Abdul Gani Patail(left), whom he indicted of fabricating justification associated to a black-eye incident.
It was reported which Musawithdrewhis fit which he filed in 2008, after Anwar lodged apolice reportagainst him, Abdul Gani, Mat Zain as well as Kuala Lumpur Hospital doctor Abdul Rahman Yusof upon Jul 1, 2008.
Malaysiakiniobtained letters from Musa's lawyers upon a duplicate to find a delay of Tuesday's hearing following Hisyam as well as Ghazi's incapacity to come to probity for a trial. However, Kuala Lumpur High Court Judicial Commissioner Asmabi Mohamad did not wish a postponement.
This portal also perceived a duplicate of a declare list from Musa's lawyers which states Musa as well as Mat Zain's names as two of a witnesses. The remaining two have been unnamed officers from TV3 as well as a Malaysian Communication as well as Multimedia Communications (MCMC).
'Musa cannot pardon himself'
Normally in civil probity cases, declare statements have been exchanged prior to a hearing starts for both sides to hope for a case.
Commenting serve upon Musa's preference to withdraw, Mat Zain believed Musa might have run scared as well as to illustrate withdrew, but might have longed for to create a sense which it was Anwar who had suggested a settlement.
"If he was rebuilt to distortion prior to a open plainly such as yesterday, he must have lied about Anwar or farfetched a justification opposite Anwar when Musa briefed Dr Mahathir Mohamad in 1998 which led to Anwar's sacking, as well as later being charged as well as convicted upon allegations of abuse of power."
Mat Zain pronounced Musa's withdrawal also does not pardon him or Abdul Gani's wrongdoings in fabricating justification in a black-eye incident.
![]()
Anwar, Mat Zain said, is not a chairman of management to contend who stays indicted as well as who should be probed serve as a task is left to a military or a investigating military officer (IO) of a black-eye box to decide.
"If Musa feels which his purpose in a black-eye situation was poorly interpreted, than he should challenge a IO as well as not a victim. For me, it is Musa who helped Abdul Gani as well as a former AG, a late Mohtar Abdullah, to fall short military credit from which it had nonetheless to redeem until today.
"Musa betrayed a force. It was based upon this built medical re! port that! a AG 'overturned' military commentary in a black-eye investigation to 'self-inflicted injuries' instead of attack by a former IGP Abdul Rahim Noor. Based upon a AG's twisted matter dated January 1, 1999, a cupboard motionless to settle a royal commission of inquiry (RCI)," he said.
Will Anwar really pull for a tribunal?
Mat Zain pronounced Anwar has settled which he is going to pull for a judiciary opposite Abdul Gani.
"Let's see either Anwar (second from left, front row) meant it or is this only another political statement. He must realize which what Abdul Gani did was not an offence or offences opposite an individual such as attack where a chairman assaulted can forgive as well as forget.
"Abdul Gani's offences have been opposite a state as well as open justice. It is not for Anwar to forgive or dont think about what Gani had done. Since Anwar has pronounced which he is going to pull for a judiciary aft! erwards let's all wait as well as see either Anwar will mobilize his strength as a antithesis personality to quarrel for as well as uphold open probity for a consequence of all. Or either he is willing to quarrel for his own personal survival instead."
Musa as well as Abdul Gani were probed by a Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) for abuse of power, where a three-member row comprising former judges of a Federal Court as well as Court of Appeal were appointed.!
The panelclearedthe duo of any indiscretion as had been voiced by a de facto law minister Nazri Abdul Aziz. However, Mat Zain argued which a row was not scrupulously instituted as well as has no powers to decide a upon AG's conduct as they were allocated as emissary open prosecutors underneath direct carry out of a AG as settled in a Criminal Procedure Code.
"It's not a question of who or what a row members were when they were in use but what powers were since to them when they were appointed. There is no disbelief each as well as each one of them have been most suitable as well as competent to be allocated but they were never allocated as such for this exercise.
"I brave contend a row was never shown all a three reports done by Dr Abdul Rahman. The row would not have cleared Gani as well as Musa had they been since a possibility to demeanour during those reports," he said.
Read More @ Source Mat Zain longed fo! r action to be taken opposite Musa as well as present attorney-general Abdul Gani Patail(left), whom he indicted of fabricating justification associated to a black-eye incident.It was reported which Musawithdrewhis fit which he filed in 2008, after Anwar lodged apolice reportagainst him, Abdul Gani, Mat Zain as well as Kuala Lumpur Hospital doctor Abdul Rahman Yusof upon Jul 1, 2008.
Malaysiakiniobtained letters from Musa's lawyers upon a duplicate to find a delay of Tuesday's hearing following Hisyam as well as Ghazi's incapacity to come to probity for a trial. However, Kuala Lumpur High Court Judicial Commissioner Asmabi Mohamad did not wish a postponement.
This portal also perceived a duplicate of a declare list from Musa's lawyers which states Musa as well as Mat Zain's names as two of a witnesses. The remaining two have been unnamed officers from TV3 as well as a Malaysian Communication as well as Multimedia Communications (MCMC).
'Musa cannot pardon himself'
Normally in civil probity cases, declare statements have been exchanged prior to a hearing starts for both sides to hope for a case.
Commenting serve upon Musa's preference to withdraw, Mat Zain believed Musa might have run scared as well as to illustrate withdrew, but might have longed for to create a sense which it was Anwar who had suggested a settlement.
"If he was rebuilt to distortion prior to a open plainly such as yesterday, he must have lied about Anwar or farfetched a justification opposite Anwar when Musa briefed Dr Mahathir Mohamad in 1998 which led to Anwar's sacking, as well as later being charged as well as convicted upon allegations of abuse of power."
Mat Zain pronounced Musa's withdrawal also does not pardon him or Abdul Gani's wrongdoings in fabricating justification in a black-eye incident.
"If Musa feels which his purpose in a black-eye situation was poorly interpreted, than he should challenge a IO as well as not a victim. For me, it is Musa who helped Abdul Gani as well as a former AG, a late Mohtar Abdullah, to fall short military credit from which it had nonetheless to redeem until today.
"Musa betrayed a force. It was based upon this built medical re! port that! a AG 'overturned' military commentary in a black-eye investigation to 'self-inflicted injuries' instead of attack by a former IGP Abdul Rahim Noor. Based upon a AG's twisted matter dated January 1, 1999, a cupboard motionless to settle a royal commission of inquiry (RCI)," he said.
Will Anwar really pull for a tribunal?
Mat Zain pronounced Anwar has settled which he is going to pull for a judiciary opposite Abdul Gani.
"Let's see either Anwar (second from left, front row) meant it or is this only another political statement. He must realize which what Abdul Gani did was not an offence or offences opposite an individual such as attack where a chairman assaulted can forgive as well as forget."Abdul Gani's offences have been opposite a state as well as open justice. It is not for Anwar to forgive or dont think about what Gani had done. Since Anwar has pronounced which he is going to pull for a judiciary aft! erwards let's all wait as well as see either Anwar will mobilize his strength as a antithesis personality to quarrel for as well as uphold open probity for a consequence of all. Or either he is willing to quarrel for his own personal survival instead."
Musa as well as Abdul Gani were probed by a Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) for abuse of power, where a three-member row comprising former judges of a Federal Court as well as Court of Appeal were appointed.!
The panelclearedthe duo of any indiscretion as had been voiced by a de facto law minister Nazri Abdul Aziz. However, Mat Zain argued which a row was not scrupulously instituted as well as has no powers to decide a upon AG's conduct as they were allocated as emissary open prosecutors underneath direct carry out of a AG as settled in a Criminal Procedure Code.
"It's not a question of who or what a row members were when they were in use but what powers were since to them when they were appointed. There is no disbelief each as well as each one of them have been most suitable as well as competent to be allocated but they were never allocated as such for this exercise.
"I brave contend a row was never shown all a three reports done by Dr Abdul Rahman. The row would not have cleared Gani as well as Musa had they been since a possibility to demeanour during those reports," he said.
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz &am! p; Buzz< /div>
No comments:
Post a Comment