Why the compulsion to lie, lie and lie, Rafizi?


According to KL Chronicle, Opposition Strategist Rafizi Ramli has again made the nonsensical as well as insane matter regarding Approved Permits (AP) for the import of cars - dictated specifically to confuse the rakyat, as well as create dissatisfaction towards the BN Government. Why is Rafizi still fibbing to the rakyat, it asks in the recent posting? In an additional Sep case, reports as well as blogs contend Rafizi is not to be believed. Why? Is it since Section 114A of the Evidence Act now requires headlines portals as well as bloggers to inform accurately, or have reporters as well as editors found Rafizi to be the pseudologia fantastica?
Fabiani Azmi
Psychiatristssay there have been 3 of several terms which best describe compulsive liars,pseudologia fantastica,mythomania, orpathological lying.According to Wikipedia, it was initial described in medical novel in 1891 by Anton Delbrueck. Although controversial in nature, pathological fibbing has been tangible as "falsification entirely jagged to any distinct finish in view. It competence be endless as well as really complicated, as well as competence perceptible over the period of years or even the lifetime."
But before we delve in to this seizure of the mind any deeper, let's demeanour during National Feedlot Corporation's bone of contention which Rafizi had been fibbing all these months to defame them as well as create unwarranted open outrage.
Rafizi lied upon radio
There is zero improved than conference it from the horse's mouth, they say. In the BFM 89.9 podcast, there is the recording with Rafizi in which he tells listeners which NFCorp was never serious in do! ing the beef business. Rafizi went upon to have dramatic insulting statements to contend which income was being swindled as well as siphoned off.
NFCorp however in the headlines recover had pronounced which the association has over 160 commercial operation shopping their Gemas beef. These commercial operation comprise hypermarkets, supermarkets, minimarkets, wet markets, pasar tani, processed beef manufacturers, as well as the host of hotels, restaurants as well as cafes (HORECA sector). The commercial operation subsequently sell to some-more than 100,000 sell consumers each week. Now if this is not serious business, what afterwards is it? Why did Rafizi distortion to expel the different perception?
Can we equate upon Rafizi to equate correctly?
Rafizi claims he is the lerned chartered accountant. In the Malaysian Insider inform (1 November 2011), he pronounced NFCorp met customarily 5% of the projected annual devise of 50,000 tonnes of beef (5% from 330,000 heads of cattle) for 2009. Rafizi with the squad of PR assemblymen had tried to benefit entry in to the NFC to do the little mathematics audit. According to the Malaysian Insider, they were rebuffed by security whilst arguing which they had the right to go in as well as "count cows". So if Rafizi as well as squad had not entered the NFC, how did he equate the heads of cattle?
An Implementation Agreement sighted showed which NFCorp met rough targets set by the supervision for the NFC. For 2010, NFCorp's aim was charted during 8,000 heads. NFCorp had alien 8,897 heads of cattle, 897 heads or eleven per cent some-more than the aim charted for which year.
As always, Rafizi appears to have not had the scold design or the full set of numbers. His dramatization of his arguments was premised upon lies as well as fabrications.The aim of 330,000 heads of cattle claimed by Rafizi does not exist. Even going up the road, the central aim for 2015 in Sched! ule 9 of the Implementation Agreement for NFCorp reads 60,000 heads of cattle. So since did Rafizi misrepresent as well as distort? More so, since did Rafizi distortion to Malaysians?
Can Rafizi read? Or did he not read?
The Auditor General's 2010 Report was really transparent which the Auditor General (AG) customarily audits the supervision machine comprising ministries, supervision departments, supervision agencies, supervision owned companies, as well as supervision projects. The AG's foreword confirms this. It does not review in isolation singular companies purebred with the Companies Commission of Malaysia (CCM).
But during the outset of the NFCcommotion in 2011, Rafizi went during length to demonise NFCorp (the company)backing the Auditor-General's avowal which the project had turned "into the mess" (Malaysian Insider, 1 November 2011).
On 26 Jan 2012, the AG Tan Sri Amrin Buang surfaced with the headlines recover to explain which NFCorp had not been audited, customarily the supervision NFC project underneath the Ministry of Agriculture as well as Agro-Based Industry was. More importantly, NFCorp was not in the "mess", putting to rest months of tireless open bashing from hard-line critics as well as the riled public.According to the AG's statement, the review was to evaluate either the NFC project had been delicately planned, either the implementation was carried out prudently as well as had met the objective. The review was never upon NFCorp.
So since did Rafizi misrepresent as well as crush NFCorp? Why did he lie?
No giveaway land as well as certainly not 5,000 acres
Rembau MP Khairy Jamaluddin had in the eleven November MalaysiaKini inform said, "Rafizi had supposed which NFCorp was given 5,000 acres of land in Gemas, Negeri Sembilan, for free. This is categorically fake NFC was c! ustomari ly offering 1,500 acreson leaseby the Negeri Sembilan Menteri Besar Incorporated."
"Two major errors: upon the acreage of the land in subject as well as the actuality which it is upon lease, not handed out for free. You will notice which Rafizi creates no mention of this in his MalaysiaKini square upon November 10, although there is still the November 1 blog entry with the difference '1 lembu = 5 ekar'."
"Great math," quipped Khairy.
Documents sighted uncover the life of the franchise agreement so the land isn't giveaway as claimed by Rafizi. And Khairy was right which it was just 1,500 acres. The franchise agreement reads so.
So since did Rafizi lie?
Perhaps Khairy sums it best when he said, "Something which has turn terribly transparent to me is which via this debate, Rafizi has shown himself to be disingenuous, prejudiced as well as in the robe of shifting the goalposts the really moment he realises the line of attack is broken down."
KL Eco City distortion as well as phony nuked
The debate upon loans for the KL Eco City bureau lots was an additional perfect e.g. where Rafizi realized which his line of attack had been shot down. Rafizi deliberately twisted as well as skewed the bank papers he had unlawfully obtained from the bank employee. MalaysiaKini prisoner it all upon camera upon 7 March 2012 (http://www.malaysiakini.tv/video/23239/more-properties-in-bangsar-bought-by-nfc-directors.html).
Brandishing as well as dispensing the papers in outright defilement of BAFIA, he dramatised the media in to believing which he had the tough facts upon loans taken for eight bureau lots as well as information upon the bad credit station of the directors. Rafizi even lied which the loans were taken during the jeopardy of NFCorp's RM71 million supervision deposit! ion in t he bank when he provided the sly investigate of the bank documents.
However, NFCorp clarified to contend no loans were ever taken for KL Eco City by the company. The papers Rafizi had were for alternative in isolation personal loans taken in 2005 as well as 2008 not continuous in any approach to KL Eco City. Our tighten investigation of the bank papers Rafizi had given to the media showed the loans had in actuality commenced as far behind as 2005 as well as 2008. It is engaging to note which KL Eco City was customarily launched for sale in 2011. And if we demeanour during the equation, NFCorp was not even shaped in 2005. Ultimately, the steep which the RM71 million deposition was underneath threat, was debunked.
Since his line of attack was nuked, there has not been the further cheep from Rafizi upon the supposed loans for the KL Eco City bureau lots. However, sources tighten to NFCorp contend Rafizi's deceit had caused irreparable repairs to NFCorp as well as the chairman. On the grounds of lies as well as fabrication, the whole nation was riled against them. No prizes for guessing since NFCorp is preparing to sue the pants off Rafizi.
Why does Rafizi thrive upon lies? Why is he so bent hell?
Yes, since does Rafizi distortion so really often, begs the question? Wikipedia as well as alternative Internet resources contend which the defining characteristics of pseudologia fantastica or the compulsive liar are:
The stories told lend towards toward presenting the liar favorably. For example, the person competence be presented as being fantastically brave, bold as well as brazen. It would even have the liar be viewed as the towering hero. Or even related to many famous people.
The complaint additionally customarily affects people with low self-respect they distortion to have themselves feel critical as well as since they have been not mean! s to com municate well with alternative people. They have been means to capture courtesy by exaggerating or making up stories or anecdotes.
The stories told have been not entirely improbable. They have been not the manifestation ofdelusionor the little broader type ofpsychosis: upon confrontation, the teller can confess them to be untrue, even if unwillingly.
The fabricative tendency is long lasting.
Pseudologia fantastica competence additionally benefaction asfalse memory syndrome, where the sufferer honestly believes which fictitious events have taken place, in any case which these events have been fantasies.
Pathological fibbing zealot creates fake statements
Wikipedia explains which fibbing is the action of both intentionally as well as intentionally/willfully making the fake statement. Pathological fibbing is deliberate the mental illness, since it takes over rational settlement as well as progresses in to the fantasy world as well as back. Some investigate suggests which certain people competence have the "predisposition to lying".
Excessive fibbing is the usual sign of many mental illnesses. There have been several consequences of being the pathological liar. Due to lack of trust, many pathological liars' relationships as well as friendships fail. Is this not what we hear from the opposition's grape vine? If the disease continues to progress, fibbing could turn so severe as to cause legal problems.
Is Rafizi in the little apocalyptic need of help?
About the Writer
Fabiani Azmi is an zealous reader of Internet headlines portals simila! r to Mal aysia Today as well as alternative blogsites. He believes the world's mysteries can be solved. And it does not warrant the paleontologist to investigate.
Read More @ Source



More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz

No comments: