Its about whats in it for me?


Whatever it might be Pakatan Rakyat admits which it needs to cheat a electorate as well as to have them promises to be means to get their votes. ABU, great governance, transparency, accountability, etc., have been not enough. The electorate would not give we their votes usually since we guarantee them a improved government. What is some-more critical to them than a improved supervision would be what's in it for me?
THE CORRIDORS OF POWER
Raja Petra Kamarudin
PKR eyes pitch electorate in cheaper cars campaign
(The Malaysian Insider) - PKR is promissory note upon a guarantee to lower automobile prices to win await from fence-sitting electorate ahead of what is expected to be parsimonious race for energy in a subsequent ubiquitous elections.
The celebration has betrothed to have cars cheaper by slicing a three times taxation weight imposed upon cars if a Pakatan Rakyat (PR) antithesis agreement takes energy after a subsequent elections which contingency be called by April subsequent year.
"From what we see, online or when we go down (to a ground)...you see a crowd is not routinely domestic or partisan being really meddlesome ... making queries ..." pronounced PKR communications director Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad.
"It shows which we strech to a brand new audience, a brand new group, which is a fence-sitters."
"We get people who plainly claim they have been Umno, (but) in this campaign, they have been fully behind us."
PKR will have a initial 'Turunkan Harga Kereta' forum during a Kuala Lumpur as well as Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall during 8pm this Thursday.
The forum will be moderated by Nik Nazmi as well as will feature PAS' Dr Dzulkefly Ahmad, DAP's Tony Pua, PKR's Rafizi R! amli as well as consider tank IDEAS' Wan Saiful Wan Jan.
**************************************
Now PKR is talking. we have been perplexing to tell we for some time which those of we who visitMalaysia Todaymay be ABU screamers, though which does not meant which all 14-15 million Malaysians who have been purebred to opinion have been additionally a same.
In fact, substantially about 4-5 million purebred electorate might not even be starting out to opinion in a entrance ubiquitous election. And substantially another 3-4 million authorised electorate did not even register to vote. Hence we might see rounded off usually 10 million Malaysians choosing by casting votes in a 13th General Election with about 8 million or so 'abstaining'.
This means usually 55% or so of Malaysians caring whilst a alternative 45% do not caring a damn. How else can we put it?
Okay, so we can expect to see about 5 million or so of we (around 10% or so of those who substantially readMalaysia Today) choosing by casting votes for Pakatan Rakyat come a subsequent ubiquitous election. That would meant 13 million of we who have been authorised to opinion would really not be choosing by casting votes for Pakatan Rakyat.
Do we consider with usually 5 million votes Pakatan Rakyat can get to form a subsequent sovereign government?
If 10 million people come out to opinion afterwards Pakatan Rakyat will need around 6 million of those votes if it wants to march in to Putrajaya. If it is usually 5 million votes afterwards Barisan Nasional is starting to remain in power.
So how is Pakatan Rakyat starting to get some-more than 5 million votes? How is Pakatan Rakyat starting to convince an additional 1 million electorate to not usually stay home though to come out to opinion and, some-more importantly, to opinion for Pakatan Rakyat?
Well, if we usually wish to see a clever two-party complement in Mala! ysia as well as if we wish to see Pakatan Rakyat turn which clever antithesis afterwards usually continue doing what we have been doing. Pakatan Rakyat can substantially win 85-95 seats in Parliament as well as during least three state governments -- with Barisan Nasional's majority in another three state governments reduced drastically.
But which is about it.
To do improved than which we need to strech beyond a ABU screamers. You need to strech a middle ground as well as blockade sitters. These people do not caring a damn whether Najib Tun Razak or Anwar Ibrahim is a subsequent Prime Minister. They do not caring about Barisan Nasional or Pakatan Rakyat. They usually caring aboutNumero Uno.
Pakatan Rakyat is commencement to assimilate this. Phewand it took a lot of bashing before they would wake up to this fact. Now they have been articulate about a really largeatas pagaror fence-sitting group. Now they have been articulate about how to cheat a voters. And this is fundamentally what it is, how to cheat a voters.
And Pakatan Rakyat is charity these electorate cheaper cars. Well, which substantially functions in Malaysia. In a UK which won't work since cars have been already cheap. In Malaysia, a automobile similar to a BMW 3 Series costs a homogeneous of 20-25 years salary for a simple salary earner. In a UK, it is usually 2-2.5 years salary for a homogeneous salaried worker. So how cheaper do we wish cars to be? Anyway, not most people need cars in a UK considering which a open ride complement is really efficient, distinct in Malaysia.
But would a guarantee of cheaper cars be enough to get these 'don't caring a damn' people to opinion for you? What about housing? Some people be concerned about housing some-more than about cars. How about a cost of living as well as minimum wage? How about peculiarity of life? How about a really worrying crime rate? How about preparation as well as health?
Yes, cars have been not! all whi ch there is to life. When we already have everything else afterwards cars turn critical to you. But when we do not have a decent home or access to a peculiarity education, etc., cars have been not during a tip of your priority list.
Whatever it might be Pakatan Rakyat admits which it needs to cheat a electorate as well as to have them promises to be means to get their votes. ABU, great governance, transparency, accountability, etc., have been not enough. The electorate would not give we their votes usually since we guarantee them a improved government. What is some-more critical to them than a improved supervision would be what's in it for me?
Now Pakatan Rakyat admits which electorate need to be bribed as well as which all those people who speak so most have been actually usually a bucket of bullshit. we mean, even most who post comments here inMalaysia Todayare a bucket of bullshit. They credit this person or which person of being paid for whilst they post comments under anonymous names so which they have been safe as well as will not get detected/arrested as well as lose their jobs, etc. These people have been some-more concerned about their comfort/security as well as they have a gall to credit alternative people of which really crime they have been guilty of.
we know most of we have been right away starting to credit these sorts of electorate as carrying no principles. Come on! Even we opinion formed upon what we can get. Would we opinion for someone usually so which we can help which person get in to energy with no benefit to you? You opinion for someone since we wish something. No one votes for nothing. It is usually which we have been in denial mode as well as will not confess it.
Read More @ Source



More Barisan Nasional ! (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz

No comments: