In fact, to be honest, we am essentially utterly delighted. we am enjoying observant these people humour what we have suffered. Okay, may be it is not satisfactory of me to think similar to this. But who cares about being fair? we mean, when someone does something to you, we cruise it elegant probity when a same thing is finished to him or her. Hence we do not unequivocally caring either what is being finished to them is satisfactory or not. we am only so happy which they have been right away being subjected to what they subjected me to.
THE CORRIDORS OF POWER
Raja Petra Kamarudin
Suaram trio told to insist unfamiliar funding
Jaringan Melayu Malaysia (JMM) is calling upon PKR leader Tian Chua as good as Suara Rakyat Malaysia senior manager Kua Kia Soong as good as co-founder R. Sivarasa to insist to Malaysians why Suaram is allegedly saved by unfamiliar parties.
JMM boss Azwanddin Hamzah yesterday urged a trio to hold a press discussion to inform therakyatwhy unfamiliar influence had been used to meddle in a country's political agenda.
"We additionally wish to know if Tian Chua, Sivarasa as good as Kua have paid taxes to a Inland Revenue Board (IRB) from a supports perceived from currency swindler George Soros.
"It's very clear which Soros was a designer at a behind of a skeleton of bringing down a country's economy," he pronounced yesterday in a statement.
Azwanddin urged IRB arch senior manager officer Tan Sri Mohd Shukor Mahfar to investigate as good as ensure which a key Suaram figures were paying corporate income tax.
Suaram has been tormented with debate with reports which it was not a non-governmental organisation but an entity purebr! ed as a association called Suara Inisiatif Sdn Bhd as good as a explanation of "highly suspicious" account transactions between Suaram as good as Suara Inisiatif.
The Domestic Trade, Cooperatives as good as Consumerism Ministry has been investigating either an American non-governmental organisation which is allegedly appropriation Suaram is linked to Soros.
Emails have been reportedly found linking a income to Soros.
******************************************
Perkasa: Suaram funders additionally at a behind of LGBT programmes
Malay rights organisation Perkasa information arch Ruslan Kasim has claimed which a funders of Suaram were additionally obliged for supporting programmes for a Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual as good as Transexual (LGBT) community.
This, he pronounced in anMingguan Malaysiareport today, was upon tip of appropriation Suaram with a purpose of smearing Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak in a Scorpene debate as good as a attempted murder of Mongolian national Altantuya Shaariibuu.
"They additionally account programmes for apostasy, giveaway sex similar to LGBT. These have been all against Islam," he was quoted as saying.
Ruslan was referring to Suaram's abroad appropriation which a supervision has claimed which between others, came from organisations linked to currency swindler George Soros.
Ruslan additionally questioned either Suaram had paid in isolation investigator P Balasubramaniam to have a orthodox declaration to claim a premier's name.
"We wish to know who saved Suaram to pay a in isolation investigator to have a orthodox declaration," he was quoted as saying.
******************************************
10 sebab Anwar tidak layak jadi PM
1. Sokong Israel
2. Bantuan asing (kini terbukti SUARAM)
! 3. Anwar pluralisme Islam
4. Buku Jingga declaration akan rosakkan ekonomi negara
5. Tiada kabinet bayangan. Siapa Timbalan Perdana Menteri dan Menteri Kewangan?
6. Sokong LGBT yang hukum haram
7. Pembohongan 916 satu politik yang amat besar
8. Mahu jatuhkan kerajaan guna demonstrasi jalanan ... Tahrir Square
9. Video China doll tulin dan Anwar tak jelaskan
10. Kes liwat tak selesai dan Mahkamah Tinggi lepaskan atas teknikal
******************************************
It looks similar to a 'Gang Suaram' is under critical attack. Tian Chua, R. Sivarasa, Dr. Kua Kia Soong, Dr. Yeoh Seng Guan, Elizabeth Wong, Cynthia Gabriel, Latheefa Koya, Yap Swee Seng, Premesh Chandran, Edmund Bon, S. Arutchelvam, as good as a couple of others, all have bullets with their names upon them.
They have been purported to have perceived bootleg appropriation from abroad sources. They have been purported to have perceived financial await from George Soros. They have been purported to be collection of a Americans. They have been purported to be supporters of Lesbians, Gays, Bisexuals as good as Transexuals (LGBTs). They have been purported to be at a behind of a pierce to get Muslims to leave Islam. They have been purported to be Communists. They have been purported to have bribed in isolation investigator P. Balasubramanian in to signing a fake orthodox declaration to defame as good as slander Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak. There have been questions as to either these 'Gang Suaram' people may additionally be concerned with a same people who have been at a behind of a recent ant-Islam movie. In fact, if a object starts rising from a west instead of a east, these people would substantially be blamed for which as well.
Are these allegations fair? Are these allegations founded? Is there any law in these allegations?
we suppose which is not important. What is c! ritical would be: can these people infer their innocence? If these allegations were not loyal afterwards they would have to offer evidence to infer which they have been not true.
Maybe dual years ago we would not be talking similar to this. Two years ago, we will have pronounced which a prosecution needs to infer a allegation. The accused needs not infer anything. Those who have a claim need to infer it.
That would have been dual years ago.
Since then, however, a manners have changed. The brand new order is: once an claim has been done against we afterwards we need to infer which a claim is not true. Until we can infer it is not loyal afterwards we contingency cruise it as true. You have been guilty until we can infer your innocence.
we did not realize until about dual years ago in 2010 which this is a brand new order of a game. And we was subjected to this brand new rule. As many as we attempted to criticism as good as confess my innocence, whatever we pronounced was not accepted. we am guilty until we could infer we am innocent.
we have essentially got utterly used to it by now. we suppose after dual years we can arrange of get used to anything. Hence we find it extremely formidable to sympathise with all these people.
In fact, to be honest, we am essentially utterly delighted. we am enjoying observant these people humour what we have suffered. Okay, may be it is not satisfactory of me to think similar to this. But who cares about being fair? we mean, when someone does something to you, we cruise it elegant probity when a same thing is finished to him or her. Hence we do not unequivocally caring either what is being finished to them is satisfactory or not. we am only so happy which they have been right away being subjected to what they subjected me to.
The critical thing, though, is not either we or we caring about what is being finished to them or either it is satisfactory or not. we think many people who readMalaysi a Todayhave already some-more or less done up their minds as to which party they have been going to opinion for. It is a blockade sitters which make a difference more.
For example, many non-Malay electorate in Selangor already know either they have been going to opinion for Barisan Nasional or Pakatan Rakyat. A vast majority has already done up their mind. Hence a Chinese, Indians as good as 'lain-lain' do not unequivocally matter.
The destiny of Selangor will rely upon a Malay voters. Hence Umno as good as Barisan Nasional need to convince a Malay electorate which all these allegations against a 'Gang Suaram' have been true. And if a Malays have been convinced afterwards Pakatan Rakyat is going to lose a lot of Malay votes. And which would meant Barisan Nasional would be means to take behind Selangor, a valuables in a crown.
To me this goes beyond Barisan Nasional as good as Pakatan Rakyat. It is about observant those people who unfairly accuse me of something we did not do right away humour a same fate.
Is Pakatan Rakyat going to get harm by this? Who a ruin cares! All we caring about is which a squad which went out of their approach to whack me is right away removing whacked as good as which they competence lose Selangor because of it.
we suppose, as they say, punish is best served cold. HmmI am enjoying this so many I'm at a point of removing an orgasm.
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment