Seditious remarks in Umno youth facebook. Why push the blame onto others?


Recently, a factious remark observant which voting for Pakatan Rakyat would result to Christianity becoming an official sacrament of this countrty, has been posted in a Umno girl facebook. When open outrage increased as well as condemnation from a open went out of control, Umno girl leaders were discerning to board military inform to explain which their facebook has been hacked as well as an additional military inform by denying which which facebook page was not theirs.

Immediately, most Umno girl leaders came out to explain either someone has hacked in to their facebook page or which facebook page doesn't go to a movement. So, which is which? And a latest matter came from Umno girl chief Khairy Jamaluddin observant which he is willing to be charged underneath a new Section 114A of a Evidence Act 2012, usually after a military voiced which a factious remarks posted in a Umno girl facebook page would not be investigated underneath Section 114A of a Evidence Act 2012 though instead, it would be investigated underneath a Communications as well as Multimedia Act.

Well, in accordance to a Section 114A of a Evidence Act 2012, it is clear, either you similar to it or not, if those unwelcome remarks or whatever it is seditious, as prolonged as it appears in your website, facebook or whatsoever will be deemed to have been produced or written by you unless you could infer otherwise.

When this Act was amended to add in this section, all BN members of parliament, together with those from Umno had came up in full await for a additional proviso to be added in to a Act citing there have been already as well most online users right away who have been regulating a worldwide w! eb to cr iticise as well as condemn a BN government.

When any facebook page, websites or blogs which have been found to have remarks or statements which have been deemed to be overly vicious towards a BN government, Umno girl leaders as well as members have been discerning to board military reports nationwide by claiming which all those remarks as well as statements have been "seditious" as well as could "harm a nation's inhabitant security" a! t large. And theory what happened? The military acted immediately.

But when Umno girl right away got eaten up by factious remarks of their own making, they blamed others. They blamed hackers had intruded in to their facebook page as well as put up such remarks, then they twisted an additional story again by observant which facebook page doesn't go to them during all. There it goes, when a Section 114A of a Evidence Act 2012 is effectively in force, a military as well as even a Attorney-General has decided not to make use of it on a Umno youth. Guess what again? The authorities have been taking a little longer time to investigate this box (of Umno youth) by logic which it is complicated.

This means, a overlord could get away with a law of their own doing, whilst others contingency face it. Is this fair? No, a law was made to prosecute others though not one of their own even if their guilt has been obviously proven. So, why bother adhering to a law in a first place when those in energy have been except it blatantly?
Read More @ Source



More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR)! | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz

No comments: