Section 114a according to Fatimah Zuhri

While a little folks were gone upon a self-imposed internet trance to criticism Section 114a of a Evidence Act, blogger Fatimah Zuhri sheds light upon a blackness, as well as reassures us which there's positively zero to fright ... if we haven't done zero wrong ...

Amendment to a Evidence Act 1950

by Fatimah Zuhri

1. Are we ill as well as sleepy of a consistent fitnah/lies being thrown onward as well as back?

2. Are we ill of a shitty politickings which have engulfed a republic since 2008?

3. Are we repulsed by a consistent "baling batu sembunyi tangan" type of people?

4. Well, demeanour no further folks; soon we will have an updated version of Evidence Act 1950.

5. Parliament is discussing to improve a old Evidence Act 1950 by introducing a 3 things:

To refurbish a name of a act to Evidence Act 2012

New clarification of computer

Presumption of guilt

6. Amendment No.1 is not controversial - it is just becoming opposite a name.

7. Amendment No.2 is needed since a clarification of mechanism in 1950 or even 1998 is really opposite compared to today. Today a line in between what can be deliberate as a mechanism is almost self-existent - even a mobile phone can be deliberate computer!
Currently, a clarification in a old Act about mechanism is:
computer equates to any device for recording, storing, processing, retrieving or producing any report or alternative matter, or for behaving any a singular or some-more of those functions, by whatever name or description such device is called; as well as where dual or some-more computers carry out any a si! ngular o r some-more of those functions in multiple or in succession or differently howsoever conjointly, they shall be treated as a singular computer;
Parliament would similar to to refurbish it to:
computer equates to an electronic, magnetic, optical, electrochemical, or alternative interpretation estimate device, or a organisation of such interconnected or compared devices, behaving logical, arithmetic, storage as well as arrangement functions, as well as includes any interpretation storage trickery or communications trickery without delay compared to or handling in as well as with such device or organisation of such interconnected or compared devices, though does not include an automated typewriter or typesetter, or a unstable hand held calculator or alternative similar device which is on-programmable or which does not contain any interpretation storage facility;.

8. We have been a building republic in a complicated world. Do we wish to have a 50s Act for 2012? So no complaint right for No.2? Good!

9. Now, we come to a controversial partial of a legislative addition - No.3.Parliment would similar to to add 3 additional information. If we do not understand, review my outline inbold.
*** Publication here refers to photos/article/tweet/posting/chat/etc.
114A.(1) A chairman whose name, sketch or pen name appears upon any announcement depicting himself as a owner, host, administrator, editor or sub-editor, or who in any manner facilitates to tell or re-publish a announcement is reputed to have published or re-published a contents of a announcement unless a contrary is proved.

Meaning:You have been indicted if your genuine name or your internet nickname is being used as a owners of an article, which is underneath investigation.HOWEVERif we can yield explanation which we were framed as well as somebody els! e used y our name to write which article, we should not be worry.
Scenario:There is an essay patrician "Azmin makan duit rakyat Selangor". The author wrote her name as Nazmi. Azmin brings Nazmi to court. Nazmi in her invulnerability said "it was not me Min, sumpah! Bukan I Min! Percayalah...".
Since a essay was created in blogger.com (owned by Google), a military can request a IP of a "mysterious writer" from Google. Every time we record in to your blogger or Goggle account, your IP will be stored in Google system. From a military investigation, they found which a IP does not belong to Nazmi's account.Turn out a tangible bard is:Faekah.

(2) A chairman who is purebred with a network use provider as a subscriber of a network use upon which any announcement originates from is reputed to be a chairman who published or re-published a announcement unless a contrary is proved.
Meaning:You have been indicted if your comment (UNIFI/STREAMYX/MAXIS/DIGI/etc) was used to tell an essay underneath investigation.HOWEVERif we can yield explanation which we were framed as well as somebody else used your name to write which article, we should not be worry.Scenario:There is print of Izzah painted with a words "Izzah Penipu dan Gila Kuasa". The comment was underneath a name Chua. Izzah brought Chuato court. Chua in his invulnerability said : "Zah..bukan abang sayang...abang sayang Izzah..takkan la abang nak sabotage syg. Abg ni suka gigit...gigit telinga...sabotage ni tak main".
Every computer/phone/laptop/Xbox/etc has a MAC address. When we connect to a Internet your ISP can see this. The military check asked Chua either he has any electronic inclination as well as Chua replied "Only my phone sir" whilst looking at a officer's ear. Upon checking a MAC residence of a phone, a MAC residence did not match.
Turn o ut a tangible bard is:Azmin.

(3)Any chairman who has in his carry out or carry out any mechanism upon which any announcement originates from is reputed to have published or re-published a content of a announcement unless a contrary is proved.
Meaning:You will get indicted if your electronic inclination have publications which is underneath investigation.HOWEVERif we can yield explanation which we were framed as well as somebody else used your name to write which article, we should not be worry.Scenario:A twitter goes similar to this: "@anwaribrahim, we penipu kaum India! You promise macam2 sebelum GTX12 tapi skrg habuk joke tarak ada. @#$%@#%". The comment was tweeted underneath a comment psurendram. In anger, Anwar brought Surendran to court as well as in Surendran's invulnerability he said: "Boss...sampai hati boss tuduh saya macam ini...lupakah janji2 kita dahulu? Sebangsa, Sejiwa, Sehidup, Semati? Cuma tak selubang sahaja...tu ka sebab boss marah?"
When a twitter is posted, all a tweets have been stored in Twitter's most servers. Just similar to Facebook as well as Google, they additionally save for any tweet, info compared with which twitter e.g. time, date, location, IP, device name etc. The military can get these compared details of a twitter from Tweeter. Upon investigation, it was found which actually Surendran is innocent.
Turn out a law-breaker was someone who got sceptical with Anwar's attention towards Surendran. He got so sceptical which he took Surendran's phone whilst Surendran was busy interesting Anwar as well as done which tweet. That chairman wasAzizah!

10. If we have been trusting afterwards there is zero to be worried. It is just an legislative addition to refurbish a Act so which it is relevant according to a time.

11. Don't b! elieve a hype which we can no longer FBooking or Tweeting. You can though post/tweet usually truth! If we wish to expose about a latest corruption involving Ministers or Agencies, please do so BUT yield evidence.
No Evidence = Fitnah. Simple no?

12. Freedom of debate as well as expression is upheld. Freedom of spreading antagonistic FITNAH is not!

Old Evidence Act 1950 -www.agc.gov.my/Akta/Vol.%202/Act%2056.pdfThe New legislative addition -www.parlimen.gov.my/files/billindex/pdf/2012/DR162012E.pdf

It's a singular of a most re-tweeted links upon a subject, so make sure we leave your commentsh e r e.