Piss off, Tanda Putera filmmakers! P. Ramakrishnan



It is a wonder how a makers of a film "Tanda Putera" raked up an situation in a story which had never been documented or talked about. In fact, such an situation never even took place!
Yet, a producer-director, Shuhaimi Baba, claims which a events decorated in a movie have been based upon established truth. "My team as well as you did a lot of research, such as study documented materials as well as photographs, to make sure a scenes were backed by historical facts," she asserted upon August 4.
But where was it documented as well as by whom which Lim Kit Siang had urinated upon a flagpole (in a devalue of) a Selangor mentri besar's chateau whilst during a same time cheering a secular slur? Which photographer prisoner this purported inhuman act being committed?
We need to ask a little simple questions:
Can any one just ramble into a mentri besar's residence, pee upon a flagpole as well as sensitively walk away?
Isn't a mentri besar's chateau gated as well as guarded?
If this situation had actually taken place, since hadn't any one referred to it over a last 43 years? Was it classified under a OSA?
If Kit Siang had committed this disreputable act, wouldn't they have accomplished him off politically long ago? He wouldn't have survived this purported contemptible episode! No sane person would have supported him!
How could this situation have taken place when Kit Siang had irrevocably established a actuality which he was not in Kuala Lumpur upon May 11-13, 1969?
Was Kit Siang a delinquent or educationally sub-normal to have committed this shameful act?
Knowing Kit Siang, would any one believe which he would be which foolhardy to commit this violent act?
The answers to these questions have been simple as well as straightforward. This situation could not have taken place during all! Shuhaimi Baba shou! ld not t ry to apply artistic licence to an episode which is as serious as well as dangerous as a nation's full of blood May 13, 1969 riots!
Kit Siang is known to have walked a true trail of goodness by watching a norms of good conduct. Without such an ideal jot down it would not have been probable for him to have remained as a longest-serving antithesis personality in a parliamentary democracy.
But since is this situation without doubt a figment of a aptitude projected as something which has taken place to darken as well as degrade him?
Is it since as most tend to think a DAP has developed into a formidable force, posing a fiercest plea to a BN by threatening to wipe out a MCA? Is it since of this fright which a makers of this film have chosen to be part of this political ploy to save Umno?
It is inhuman which lies have been being invented as well as story is being twisted to offer selfish interests to safety energy as well as position.
This disgraceful control additionally poses a plea to a electorate: Are you going to condone lies as well as deceit or will you have a moral bravery to retaliate BN or more specifically Umno for this unforgivable lie as well as rotten control during a 13th ubiquitous election? aliran.com
* P. Ramakrishnan, a evident past president of Aliran, now serves upon a Aliran senior manager committee.
Read More @ Source



More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz

No comments: