Just similar to how Spain proved herself to be a many appropriate team in Euro 2012 final by violence Italy 4-0, yesterday's Chua Soi Lek vs Lim Guan Eng discuss 2.0 saw a same result Guan Eng beats Soi Lek hands down 4-0. And just similar to how a Spanish finished Italian's dream via pretentious four Silva, Alba, Torres as good as Mata Guan Eng left a lectern with his upon fire gun after degrading MCA's pretentious four as good namely Ng Yen Yen (Tourism Minister), Chor Chee Heung (Local Government Minister), Liow Tiong Lai (Health Minister) as good as of course MCA's boss himself, Chua Soi Lek.
Obviously Guan Eng came really good prepared, as compared to previous discuss 1.0, which saw a infamous Miss Tow Truck fiasco. However unlike previous discuss 1.0 which saw a incompetence from decider Tan Ah Chai (CEO of Kuala Lumpur as good as Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall), this turn is improved organized with professionalism shown by decider Michael Yeo (Asli CEO) together with fair panellists member Chor Chee Heung, Wan Hamidi (Rocketkini's arch editor) as good as Asli deputy Monash University's School of Social Sciences head James Chin.
But unlike a initial turn which was broadcasted live over Astro, a benefaction supervision wouldn't want to take a risk as good as had it behind during 11pm (the tangible discuss was during 2pm). Such action was understandable in box Soi Lek, a MCA boss who was held with his pants down bonking a woman, performs horribly, a benefaction supervision during least has a option to cancel a behi! nd broad cast. Nevertheless, it's still a mystery why such discuss was never broadcast over alternative government-controlled TV channels such as TV1, TV2, TV3 as good as NTV7, which have been noticed by farming population (*tongue-in-cheek*).
Now, the initial goal scored by Lim Guan Eng job for a discuss between PM Najib Razak as good as antithesis de-facto personality Anwar Ibrahim. Guan Eng upon purpose poked Soi Lek with his call for a discuss between Najib as good as Anwar as a people's genuine intention is to decider who a improved personality to lead a country is. Soi Lek took a bait though surprisingly rejected such a need (for a debate) formed upon laughable forgive PM Najib is a budding minister as good as as a result as good busy (or rsther than as good chicken?) to discuss with antithesis as has proven himself with mutation programmes. It makes we wonder if a benefaction cupboard members essentially speak merely about "Transformers" as good as Megan Fox everytime they attend cupboard meeting (*grin*).
The second goal by Lim Guan Eng responding to Chua Soi Lek's chest-thumping over TAR (Tunku Abdul Rahman) College achievement. Knowing education is a closest thing to a Chinese besides business, Soi Lek thought he could "tapau" (packing) Guan Eng by leveraging upon past success, a TAR College. You can bet he was roughly reaching orgasm a impulse he mentioned TAR College as good as even poked fun during Guan Eng to setup kindergarten instead. Guan Eng skillfully turned a list by degrading Soi Lek! 's MCA p arty by telling him that TAR College was setup by MCA simply since there was a share for Chinese students to enter open universities thus a need to recompense it as consolation prize. Soi Lek's orgasm literally stopped when a roars of approval exploded from a assembly after Guan Eng's unexpected "MCA! Shame-On-You !!!"
Just similar to Euro 2012s final match between Spain as good as Italy, Guan Eng scored 2 goals in a initial half. Things get improved when a second half resumed. The third goal by Guan Eng was assisted by a subject acted by panellist Wan Hamidi who asked Soi Lek if MCA was so frightened of UMNO which they do not brave to subject large corruptions allegedly finished by UMNO. Chua didn't usually skirts a subject totally, though went upon mumbling about antithesis logo, violence around underbrush about opposition's claimant for premiership, obviously held off-guard by a question. He even attempted to turn a progressing mind-boggling reply from Guan Eng by accusing a Penang Chief Minister of shaming people who donated to TAR College, call outrageous jeers as good as boos from a floor. Chua was roughly speechless as good as agitated by a question.
But a third idea has not been scored yet. Still running similar to headless chicken, Chua was obviously not recovered from a antithesis camp's aggressiveness. He seemed not to be as prepared as his opponent. He didn't know how to respond. Naturally he done a inapplicable designation when he admitted which a NEP (New Economic Policy) has been hija! cked, when asked how they will approach a NEP. Now, every Tom, Dick as good as his dog can confirmed once as good as for all which a benefaction supervision has in truth hijacked a NEP for their brothers as good as sisters cronies, interjection to Chua's own admission.
The fourth goal - was an easy idea given upon a silver platter by nothing alternative than panellist Chor Chee Heung (from MCA). Chor attempted to be smart as good as worldly by attacking opposition's Buku Jingga, not knowing which he done a silliest inapplicable designation in a process by asking Guan Eng how he skeleton to plug a leakages of RM26 billion. Guan Eng gleefully told everyone which it was a initial time he listened a minister admitting which crime was in truth costing taxpayers money to a tune of RM26 billion (*grin*). That fourth idea many sealed MCA's goal for a Euro Cup (or rsther than a Chinese, Malay, Indian as good as alternative ethnic's votes).
Actually there're more goals though a on top of have been a many pretentious goals. Unlike discuss 1.0 where Chua used a Hudud Law as scare tactic, a MCA boss wasn't h! imself t his time around. Maybe PM Najib ticked him off for criticising a Islamic Hudud implementation as good most as it could backfire from a Malay opinion banks. It doesn't assistance which Chua trumpets about Felda's IPO, polishing PM Najib's mutation repeatedly, creation fun of DAP's campaign aphorism "Ubah" (Change), chickened out from subject acted by assembly about MCA's cowardice even when confronting Law Minister Nazri, as good as fibbing through his teeth about antithesis not office building a singular low-cost house as good as not extenuation an in. of land for a office building of schools.
When even a famous MCA's Ms Tow Truck who screamed during Lim Guan Eng gave 50 points to a Penang Chief Minister, we do not have to be a rocket scientist to interpretation a leader of this discuss 2.0. The subsequent hints which uncover how really bad Soi Lek had achieved can be seen post-debate, when he criticized Guan Eng for not answering his questions as good as today's MCA-controlled theStar journal churning out criticisms as good as rambling facts about antithesis instead. It was a sweet victory for Lim Guan Eng as good as his good preparation can be seen when he didn't destroy to amuse a assembly with some jabs at Ng Yen Yen (on her Facebook's RM1.8 million scandal) as good as Liow Tiong Lai's "WWW 15 car registration number controversial.
Nevertheless Chua Soi Lek should be commended for his braveness in confronting his competition in a debate, n! onethele ss I'm sure he might not want to do it again. Maybe he should advice his boss, PM Najib to come out from his hiding as good as discuss with Anwar, once as good as for all, as good as in a process spare a anguish of alternative Ministers from carrying to do a dirty job in defending a Prime Minister as good as his tainted system of administration as good as sloganeering.
Other Articles That May Interest You
- Wee Punched By Uncle, Sign Of Chinese Uprising?
- Royal Rumble Anwar vs Tag-Team RPK as good as Najib
- DAP Lim GE vs MCA Chua SL Debate Secrets Revealed
- From Hot Chicks to White Angpows, Nothing Works
- MCA Hot Chicks A Publicity Stunt Turns Sour
- Chua Soi Lek's Sex DVDs, Cuckoo ends his Career
Harris: Don't opinion BN if we do not want ISA!
DAP Forum: ISA Arrests of Hindraf 5 - Ops Lalang II Coming? (Part 2) Speech of Harris Ibrahim, Lawyer & Founder of The People's Parliament. 21 December 2007 Video Rating: 5 / 5More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
No comments:
Post a Comment