Liong Sik's bid to recuse trial judge dismissed

The Kuala Lumpur High Court currently discharged Ling Liong Sik's duplicate to recuse a hearing decider in a Port Klang Free Zone intrigue case.

Justice Ahmadi Asnawi in his preference pronounced a applicant (Ling) had unsuccessful to uncover which there was disposition in his created judgment.

"I have scrutinised a submission from both parties as well as felt a comments done cannot be seen as an deceit as it was formed upon finding of contribution as well as upon testimony during a examination-in-chief as well as during cross-examination," he said.

"The comments do not start a running of a fair hearing of this case. It does not mean a counterclaim cannot plead a case. The duplicate has no merit as well as a box is dismissed," he said.

He afterwards ordered a hearing to resume upon July 13.

Earlier, lawyers for a former transport apportion has submitted there was apparent disposition with regard to a presiding decider in ordering Ling (right) to ente! r his de blockade as a former premier Dr Mahathir Mohamad had not been called.

In also angry about a "strong language" used in a 83-page judgment, Wong Kian Kheong, looming for Ling, pronounced a idea of apparent disposition was done with a judge's comments in a judgment.

Wong pronounced a comments done were as if there was comprehensive finality as well as there is no ambiguity in a decider arriving during his decision.

He also pronounced Mahathir should have been called by a prosecution to prepare a case.

"There is no justification which Mahathir was cheated by my customer (which is an constituent justification in a trial) as well as yet ! your lor dship (the judge) had concluded which my customer had cheated Mahathir.

"In alternative words, there was no justification prior to a probity from Mahathir who was purported to have been cheated by Ling, to testify which he was deceived," pronounced Wong.

'Real risk of bias'

Wong pronounced there was a genuine risk of disposition as a test, during which stage was prima fac! ie, though a denunciation used was strong as if it had already decided.

"There is a in accord with apprehension of disposition which my lord has already pre-decided my client's shame prior to a counterclaim justification was adduced," he said.

He pronounced his customer should be accorded a fair hearing as probity contingency be finished though contingency seen to be done.

Wong pronounced he was not doubt Justice Ahmadi's firmness though was endangered over a notice competence be since of a genuine risk of disposition to a open during large.

DPP Manoj Kurup, in praying for a duplicate to be dismissed, submitted which nothing in a paragraphs cited by Wong can be described as a genuine risk of bias.

He pronounced similarly a judge, in last to call Ling's defence, had done a consummate hearing of a witnesses including justification elicited during cross-examination.

Manoj pronounced there was no requirement for a decider to prepare such detailed grounds though he did provide! an 83-p age visualisation dealing with each points lifted in a charge.

He submitted which a field fall short in perplexing to establish a box for a judge's recusal.

Read More @ Sou! rce

More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |

Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz