What makes the domestic society?
Alamak, that's highly philosophical lah!
Why don't we get down to brass tacks as well as omit the hi-faluting bull about inhabitant ideology, vision as well as aspirations, as well as put credit or censure where they have been due we know, gut turn worldly things which we can relate to either through the personal observations, celebration of the mass as well as listening (to credible people of march wakakaka) or through articles or the pages of story created by equally credible sources.
As for kaytee, we wish to just slight it down to leaders as well as followers, where supporters could be blind, gullible or discerning.
Perhaps the most poignant (or controversial) personality the multitude has had would be Dr Mahathir. To some he's iconic even until today, the decade after he has 'retired', so he claims wakakaka. To others he's Satanic wakakaka again.
Of march to the anwaristas, he's the really epitome of Evil.
Why anwaristas? Because Dr M had single-handedly prevented their most worshiped idol Anwar Ibrahim from ascending to take up the top domestic in front of in the land.
I hold it's the empathize which anwaristas hatred Dr M from which point or some-more usually, from the situation of the black eye.
Since the observant goes, "There's most the trip 'twixt crater as well as lip", maybe this matter requires us to go serve behind in time approach before the black ey! e, or AI 's imprisonment for corruption, or even his ouster from UMNO, to investigate what was which 'slip',
yet alas, we doubt the anwaristas would wish to let untimely events get in to the approach of the great story, which of the virtually mythological manuscript of virtue, if not democracy or reformasi wakakaka, dealt with oppressive injustice since he against Dr M favoring his sons.
While there was truth in the father favoring his sons, we doubt which was the main emanate yet we suspect the anwaristas wouldn't wish unnecessary chronological commentary raised or useless serve aphorisms such as "There's honour even between thieves"?
Thieves? Wakakaka.
But let's just focus for the while upon Dr M, the m! ost admi red or most reviled domestic personality in Malaysian history.
Bloke dragged us in to the 21st Century screaming as well as kicking, yet he did it. He achieved most things to add value to Malaysian life, resources as well as pride. And so on, so forth. When he was in his prime, he himself was the honour of the nation (well, to most of the people anyway). And he did give reasons for Malaysians to be proud to be Malaysians.
Perhaps his greatest feat was to tame the hitherto untamable, we know who we mean. If we don't, go ask the hockey coach wakakaka. No one can ever take which divided from him, except himself as well as which in new times, alas, he has done so (take which feat divided from himself wakakaka).
Some even argue! which h is offer for an all inclusive Bangsa Malaysia, to make all Malaysians as Malaysians, as all Americans have been Americans as well as all Australians have been Australians etc, was the far greater achievement.
Indeed, when Dr M proposed that, suddenly we stood tall, proud as well as hopeful, as well as settled which in spite of his mistakes, during least he did one great thing in proposing the unifying supra-ethnic Bangsa Malaysia, where we would be One, the single unified as well as cohesive Malaysian multitude in spite of the ethnic as well as eremite pluralism, a la E Pluribus Unum or Bhinneka Tunggal Ika.
But alas, which was usually the offer which ! in recen t times, similar to all his progressing values, he seems to have backtracked from. Hmmm, maybe he's just perplexing to prove his 'Melaytu mudah lupa' is scold wakakaka.
We have to thus commend his 'de-fanging' feat remains his most poignant as well as most admired achievement. He wasnotonly the healing alloy yet the domestic dentist as well wakakaka.
Paradoxically, for all his achievements, he is additionally well known for his excesses, quite his profligacy in expending Malaysian resources upon non-essential mega projects, roughly similar yet admittedly not as bad as the prolonged over neighbour, Soekarno. The latter was notorious for building Stalin-era character grievous monuments as well as structures which did not alleviate his people's hunger or needs.
However, we hold which in some (not all) projects, he had the reason to his methods yet of march Ididn't/don't agree nor awai! t his in tentions, since we reckoned afterwards as well as still do currently he had it all wrong.
Dr M was additionally criticized as well as cursed for mollycoddling his lucky ones - again we hold there was the reason (his reason) to that. There is the potential post upon this by itself yet no, not in this one.
I won't go again in to details of what w! e have r eadin new timesabout him as well as his premiership such as upon what Barry Wain wrote about, or about the really painful Forex exercise, yet rather which Dr M has backtracked from most of what he promised will stay loyal to course.
Who should we censure for the dim side of his inlet or conduct?
Should we censure ourselves for gripping him in the PM's in front of for the entertain of the century, or should we censure his three predecessors, such as:
(a) Tunku for kicking him out instead of gripping him inside of UMNO to carry out him,
(b) Razak for bringing him behind in to UMNO, as well as
(c) Hussein Onn for selecting as well as ancillary him to be Deputy President in UMNO?
If we wish to indulge in pontifications as well as the lot of 'what ifs' as well as 'if onlys', afterwards we would indicate you, if we had voted BN, censure yourselves wakakaka.
You merit the personality we voted for, as well as this observant still relates currentl! y as wel l as tomorrow.
It's tellurian inlet to argue one approach or an additional upon whether Dr M was the great PM. If we had benefitted from his reign, afterwards patently we would expect we to praise him sky high, or during least give him the sensitive verdict. On the other hand, if we suffered from his prime-ministerial tenure, afterwards . well . we won't censure you.
What about Anwar Ibrahim, once his blue eye boy as well as successor anointed?
AI had enjoyed humongous benefits for sixteen years in UMNO (without the single breath of reformasi wakakaka), even unto selection as the successor anointed for the top domestic in front of of the land. In the finish AI had additionally suffered from Dr M's hands.
Of march AI's supporters as well as AI himself would contend Dr M turned upon his blue eye boy to strengthen his own sons. Those in Dr M's stay reminded us which AI deserved his expulsion from UMNO for being treacherous in his try to reject Dr M out early by regulating Zahid Hamidi as the stalking equine to accuse Dr M of cronyism as well as nepotism.
Recall what we had suggested earlier, upon who should we censure for the dim side of Dr M's inlet or conduct?
In the similar exercise, who should we censure for the dim side of AI's inlet or conduct? [I'm addressing usually those who have doubts about AI's suitability as the PM-designate - sixteen years of silence while in UMNO yet suddenly really noisy about reformasi usually after he was diminished from which party; afterwards 916 the la Sabah 1994 - so anwaristas have been excused from this subject wakakaka]
Should we censure ourselves for gripping him as the de facto personality of PKR as well as the leader-elect of Pakatan wakakaka, or should we censure the following, such as:
(a) Dr M for selecting as well as ancillary him to be Deputy President in UMNO, and
(b) Dr M for kicking him out instead of gripping him inside of UMNO to carry out him?
Hmmm,regarding above,maybe there was something Satanic about Dr M after all, wakakaka.
There was the time when manmanlai had anticipated (and hope) AAB would bring him behind in to UMNO, the lapse we hold he want! ed badly , yet HRH the Sultan of Somnambulence, most as most had accused him of low intellect, was not which stupid as to invite the dangerous inspired tiger in to UMNO wakakaka, so we can't place the 3rddot-point of censure as follows:
(c) AAB for bringing him behind in to UMNO.
Okay, what about their great sides, which of achievements as PM or behaving PM or deputy PM of these two? Wakakaka. You think about it.
Now, upon to 'followers'!
We have all loyal as well as blind followers, carefree followers, perceptive supporters or ABU followers. If youaren'tany of these, afterwards we have been not the follower wakakaka.
! What arr ange of supporters we are, we believe, have been dynamic in most ways by the attitudes, shaped by the upbringing (including education as well as indoctrination the la BTN), culture, religion, domestic ideology as well as environment, etc.
We may be supporters who would vote based upon race, religion, party policies, party performance, or herd mentality (not necessarily driven by competition or religion, similar to ABU or GAN).
I have witnessed volte-face devotion which (regardless of the direction of the allegiance) surprise, disappoint or has been all predicted to me.
The approach we await or reject domestic leaders says something about ourselves, whether we have been ready for loyal democracy or the two-party system.
What sort of supporters have been you? Please don't discuss it me pompously you're the 'freedom fighter', wakakaka.
Read More @ Source Abolish ISA open forum - Ambiga - Bar Council (1of2)
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment