One of a amendments to a Evidence Act 1950 - territory 114(a) which has yet to be gazetted - has lifted concerns which cybertroopers will, in acts of sabotage, flood online headlines portals with factious comments.
However, this is a misconception, even yet a changes to a Act have lifted critical concerns, says a Bar Council's inherent law committee conduct Syahredzan Johan."If a comments have been hosted upon a headlines portal's server though they were posted from an outside source, it will not really impact a headlines portal as it did not come from a own network," Syahredzan said.
A complaint would usually arise, he said, if a posting was made from inside of a headlines portal's Internet connection.
Section 114(a) states which if a announcement originates from one's appurtenance or network, it is reputed a owner is during a back of a publication, unless proven otherwise.
"The alternative presumption is which if one's sketch or name appears upon a announcement (as author), afterwards one is reputed to be a editor or publisher.!
"Every criticism will have a own sketch or pen name (moniker), therefore those posting them will be a ones considered a publishers. I don't think, in this scenario, it will start (news portals) much," Syahredzan said.
The legislative addition does not emanate a brand new offence, though is a procedural change which will have it most simpler for a charge to infer a case.
"It is not correct to say which it automatically proves guilt, for there have been alternative elements which must also be proved.
"For example, in a sedition case, it may be simpler for a charge to show which someon! e uttere d, posted or published something - though uttering itself is not an offence.
"The charge must still infer alternative elements, such as which a comments had factious tendencies," he said.
More energy to already absolute prosecution
However, Syahredzan pronounced a legislative addition was "unnecessary" as well as "disproportionate" as it would give some-more energy to a prosecu! tor in a n already non-level personification field, where a law should instead be safeguarding a some-more vulnerable indicted person.
"The manners of evidence have been to govern how trials have been conducted as well as to safeguard a rights of a accused, as in criminal cases, where a charge has a complete machinery to investigate though all a indicted has is his or her lawyer," he said.
The changes will bring some-more harm than good, as they will have people be some-more cautious in expressing their views as well as turn demure in pity their machines with others.
"If you dont think about to logout as well as someone uses your computer to post something bad upon Twitter... not everybody will be means to remember where they were or what they were you do during which time to infer which a posting did not come from them," Syahredzan said.
The argumentative legislative addition was passed by a Dewan Negara in May as well as is now awaiting a Agong's consent before it is gazetted as well as comes into effect. Read More @ Source
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment