Early this week, a New Straits Times published a inform quoting an MP, which contained a square of inform about Nick Xenophon which incited out to be wrong. So NST did a needful: it quickly published a correction. Plus a retraction. And an apology! It even deleted a pronounced essay from its online site. In short, a whole works!
The NST's correction, retraction, as well as apology:
And who a hell is this Nick Xenophon, again? He isn't even a Minister, only a Member of Parliament of Australia. The reason he was in a news was since he was done a leader of this group of general choosing inspectors invited to Malaysia by Anwar Ibrahim. Despite being what The Malaysian Insider described as "a well known close associate of Anwar Ibrahim", Xenophone insisted we Malaysians hold in his independence!
How did a "mistake" come about?
One detects no malice in a NST report: A Malaysian MP cited Xenophon's debate which appeared anti-Islam. It incited out which some Internet rascal had doctored which debate as well as distribute! d it. Th e NST reported what a MP said. It may have checked as well as double-checked though obviously it did not triple-check a flawlessness of a matter purportedly done by Xenophon.
The indicate is, the NST DID NOT replace a word "scientology" with "Islam", it was merely quoting a matter done by a lawmaker. The Malaysian Insider's inform (below) is, therefore, both erroneous and, perhaps, even malicious.
A mistake a NST done is easy to commit these days. The acknowledgment which a singular has done a mistake, similar to a a singular a NST done - overboard as well as low during times - takes sincerity as well as guts.
I roughly fell for it. See my a comments territory of my posting upon Nick XenophonH E R E.
This criticism came in from Anonymous:
Anonymoussaid...Bro Rocky,
More about Mr Nicholas Xenophon as well as his prior remark upon Islam. Hope which we can tell it.
Yang ikhlas,
Concerned Ummah
Excerpt from Andrew Bolt's column Herald Sun Australia (22/2/2011)...
There is a baying for a red blood of Liberal Senator Cory Bernardi for observant this:
Islam itself is a problem - its not Muslims, he told air wave hire MTR.
Muslims have been individuals which rehearse their faith in their own way, though Islam is a totalitarian, domestic as well as religious ideology.
It tells people all about how they need to conduct themselves, who theyre authorised to wed as well as how theyre authorised to treat other people.
J ulia Gillad demands a resignation of Bernardi:
Ms Gillard used Question Time upon Monday to call for a heads of Coalition immigration spokesman Scott Morrison as well as outspoken South Australian Senator Cory Bernardi....
Ms Gillard says a governing body of a past week have lifted a spook of One Nation.
It is a job of national leadership to insist to people there is ultimately nothing to be fearful of,...There is an additional path, as well as which is seeking to channel which fear as well as which rancour in to domestic gain which spook of which nauseous politics. That filthy path is prior to us again as well as a principal charge of this Parliament this week is to banish which spook again.
But heres a odd thing. I have not seen a singular word of criticism from Gillard, Labor, a Greens, a ABC or a Fairfax media for this even nastier attacks from Independent MP Nick Xenephon - attacks in which only a singular detail has been altered:
Xenophon adjournment speech, seventeen November 2009
What we have been seeing is a worldwide pattern of abuse as well as criminality. On a body of evidence this is not function by accident; it is function by design. Islam is not a religious organisation. It is a rapist organization which hides behind its so-called religious beliefs. What we hold does not mean we have been not under obligation for how we behave.
Xenophon questions whether Islam deserves support:
I ask my associate senators: do these things receptive to advice similar to religious activities to you? Does this receptive to advice similar to an organization which should be receiving await from a Australian taxpayer in a form of taxation exemptions since they explain to be a religion? In a past Islam has claimed which those who subject their organization have been attacking a groups religious freedom. It is disfigured logic, to contend a least. Religious leisure did not mean a Catholic or Anglican Churches were not held under obligation for crimes as well ! as abuse s committed by their priests, nuns as well as officialsalbeit belatedly. Ultimately, this is not about religious freedom. In Australia there have been no limits upon what we can believe. But there have been limits upon how we can behave. It is called a law, as well as no-one is upon top of it.
So a difference is...?
More about Mr Nicholas Xenophon as well as his prior remark upon Islam. Hope which we can tell it.
Yang ikhlas,
Concerned Ummah
Excerpt from Andrew Bolt's column Herald Sun Australia (22/2/2011)...
There is a baying for a red blood of Liberal Senator Cory Bernardi for observant this:
Islam itself is a problem - its not Muslims, he told air wave hire MTR.
Muslims have been individuals which rehearse their faith in their own way, though Islam is a totalitarian, domestic as well as religious ideology.
It tells people all about how they need to conduct themselves, who theyre authorised to wed as well as how theyre authorised to treat other people.
J ulia Gillad demands a resignation of Bernardi:
Ms Gillard used Question Time upon Monday to call for a heads of Coalition immigration spokesman Scott Morrison as well as outspoken South Australian Senator Cory Bernardi....
Ms Gillard says a governing body of a past week have lifted a spook of One Nation.
It is a job of national leadership to insist to people there is ultimately nothing to be fearful of,...There is an additional path, as well as which is seeking to channel which fear as well as which rancour in to domestic gain which spook of which nauseous politics. That filthy path is prior to us again as well as a principal charge of this Parliament this week is to banish which spook again.
But heres a odd thing. I have not seen a singular word of criticism from Gillard, Labor, a Greens, a ABC or a Fairfax media for this even nastier attacks from Independent MP Nick Xenephon - attacks in which only a singular detail has been altered:
Xenophon adjournment speech, seventeen November 2009
What we have been seeing is a worldwide pattern of abuse as well as criminality. On a body of evidence this is not function by accident; it is function by design. Islam is not a religious organisation. It is a rapist organization which hides behind its so-called religious beliefs. What we hold does not mean we have been not under obligation for how we behave.
Xenophon questions whether Islam deserves support:
I ask my associate senators: do these things receptive to advice similar to religious activities to you? Does this receptive to advice similar to an organization which should be receiving await from a Australian taxpayer in a form of taxation exemptions since they explain to be a religion? In a past Islam has claimed which those who subject their organization have been attacking a groups religious freedom. It is disfigured logic, to contend a least. Religious leisure did not mean a Catholic or Anglican Churches were not held under obligation for crimes as well ! as abuse s committed by their priests, nuns as well as officialsalbeit belatedly. Ultimately, this is not about religious freedom. In Australia there have been no limits upon what we can believe. But there have been limits upon how we can behave. It is called a law, as well as no-one is upon top of it.
So a difference is...?
11:25 PM
Nick Xenophon isn't "anti-islam", he is "anti-scientology". Would somebody go behind as well as review a tangible speeches?
8:28 PM
No comments:
Post a Comment