We need to ask: since have been there laws which allow such drastic action against with bare hands as well as overpowered Malaysians? Why can something so heartless turn legal? Well, which is since a many fair Yang Berhormat Ahli Parlimen who you voted for as well as sent to Parliament inspected these laws in Parliament. They inspected laws which done it authorised for a military officers or soldiers to fire or brutalise Malaysian citizens.
THE CORRIDORS OF POWER Raja Petra Kamarudin
Some readers have been wailing which you am rehashing as well as repeating what you have already pronounced before. It appears they have been tired of celebration of a mass 'the same aged thing'. Well, a Russians pronounced a universe has a memory of usually 100 days -- in response to their no response regarding a Koran Airlines KAL 007 disaster. Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad said:Melayu mudah lupa(the Malays dont consider about so easily). Actually, many Malaysiansmudah lupa, not only a Malays
you suppose those of you with prolonged memories do not similar to celebration of a mass about a same emanate again as well as again. Maybe you consider which once is sufficient as well as a summary will sink in clearly enough. We do not need to keep repeating ourselves.
In which case, since did you need to organise anti-ISA rallies each year for 50 years? Is not only a single anti-ISA convene great enough? After all, a summary is a same each time. There is no new summary in all those many rallies. It is a same aged message. So, since repeat a summary by organising a single convene after another for 50 prolonged years?
Apparently, once is not enough. Even 50 years of anti-ISA demonstrations have not done a trick. Even now, after 52 years, a ISA has not left away. It has me! rely bee n reincarnated in another hold up form.
And since do you need Bersih one, two as well as 3 -- as well as probably four, five six, as well as so on, after this? Is not only a single Bersih convene sufficient? Why a need to keep repeating ourselves? you am certain a supervision accepted a summary in Bersih 1.0 behind in November 2007. Maybe they did not listen, though they positively listened us in Bersih 1.0. Hence, is not Bersih 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, etc., redundant? If a supervision did not attend during Bersih 1.0, do you consider they have been starting to attend even if you have Bersih 10.0?
The bottom line is: people never listen. So you need to keep harping upon a same emanate as well as drum it in to their heads again as well as again. We have to keep chipping divided during a Berlin Wall, metaphorically speaking, until eventually 'the wall' comes crashing down. It did take 39 years for a Berlin Wall to eventually come tumbling down. And it took twenty-seven years for Nelson Mandela to lay in jail before his summary eventually got by as well as Apartheid additionally came tumbling down similar to a Berlin Wall.
One denote which people never attend is a demeanour which many reply to what is being written. While a subject might be about, say, a demeanour in how a local legislature workers have been killing stray dogs, instead of discussing a emanate of cruelty to animals, many concentration upon debating a colour of a dog collar. This appears to be a bent of many readers, not usually inMalaysia Todaybut in a other Blogs, websites as well as news portals as well.
you have also, again as well as again, pronounced which you need to plead a means as well as not a result. The outcome is due to a cause. We cannot shift a result. We need to attack a cause. For example, corruption, abuse of power, mismanagement of a country's resources, racism, persecution, intolerance, military brutality, strategy of a judiciary, as well as many some-more ills which! face Ma laysia, have been a result.
We cannot shift a outcome if you do not eliminate a cause. Hence, screaming as well as foaming during a mouth regarding a outcome is not starting to help. We need to understand what causes all this as well as work towards changing that. The outcome will shift once a causes have been eliminated.
Also understand a single some-more thing: you cannot keep you do a same thing as well as design different results. If you keep you do a same thing you will keep removing a same result. That is another thing which many can't seem to comprehend. Hence you need to keep repeating all these issues until people begin understanding a issue. At a moment, you have been really distant from achieving this.
Let us take a emanate of military highhandedness as well as savagery as an e.g. to what you am perplexing to say. This is a emanate which many have been debating in a emanate of Bersih 3.0 final Saturday. Was a action by a military during a Bersih 3.0 convene really brutal? That is what many of you have been debating. And a reply to which question would be 'yes'.
Okay, whilst many of your concentration upon articulate about a military highhandedness as well as savagery during final Saturday's Bersih 3.0 rally, you do not rubbish my time in engaging upon which subject. And a reason is: since you will get nowhere articulate about that. What, then, would you talk about? you would talk about this.
Police highhandedness as well as savagery has been a 'norm' since behind when you was a teen in a 1960s. you personally have been subjected to military highhandedness as well as savagery even as distant behind as 50 years ago. But it still goes upon in annoy of whatever you might say. Hence, will screaming about it shift anything unless you shift a reason since such things happen? As you said, you need to attack a cause. If a means remains, a situation will never change. And no volume of screaming is starting to help.
Do yo! u know w hich when a 'Reformasi 6' were in Kamunting behind in 2001 -- as well as which was eleven years ago -- they were knocked about up? Do you know which a couple of of us were knocked about up in front of a Dang Wangi Police Station behind in 2001 as well as you was knocked about up inside a military station? Do you know which since 1998 demonstrators were knocked about up each time they took to a streets? Do you know which in a 1970s overpowered ISA detainees behind a barbed wire fences of Kamunting were shot with rip gas as well as afterwards knocked about up when they launched a craving strike as a mark of protest? They were not demonstrating or marching upon a streets. They were locked up in Kamunting. Yet they were brutalised.
So which is a issue. The emanate is since have been a military means to brutalise overpowered adults as well as get divided with it? And how can you stop all this from happening?
You see: a military personnel have been protected by a law, especially since they have been enforcing a law, as well as we, a adults of Malaysia, get no protection, especially since you have been breaking a law. It is as simple as that. For example, if puncture were to be spoken as well as a curfew is imposed as well as a armed forces is summoned to enforce armed forces law, afterwards a soldiers have each right underneath a law to fire us dead even if you were only walking to a emporium subsequent doorway to buy some bread.
Is it right to fire someone who was only starting out to buy some bread? Of march not! But a law allows it. Once puncture is spoken as well as armed forces law is imposed, a soldiers have each authorised right to fire initial as well as ask questions later. And they did this in Kampung Baru in May 1969. Many Malays from outward Kampung Baru who had left there, as well as were stuck since of a curfew as well as had no place to go, were shot dead by a Sarawak Rangers. And there was zero illegal about this.
We need to ask: since hav! e been t here laws which allow such drastic action against with bare hands as well as overpowered Malaysians? Why can something so heartless turn legal? Well, which is since a many fair Yang Berhormat Ahli Parlimen who you voted for as well as sent to Parliament inspected these laws in Parliament. They inspected laws which done it authorised for a military officers or soldiers to fire or brutalise Malaysian citizens.
Hence, whilst you channel your annoy during a military (or soldiers, as a box might be), you am not starting to worry to whack a police. Would you wish to get indignant during a fox which ate a chicken? Is not a natural instinct of a fox to eat chickens? Is it not a nature of a beast? you wish to know how did a fox conduct to get in to a duck run in a initial place. We cannot stop a fox from eating chickens. It is what they do. But you positively could have protected a chickens. So which is where a fault lies.
you have been arrested, detained, put in prison, etc., sufficient times to know which there have been great policemen as well as jail warders as well as there have been bad policemen as well as jail warders -- only similar to there have been great politicians as well as there have been bad politicians.
you have had policemen unctuous cigarettes in to my dungeon as well as mount guard whilst you take a smoke. And it is their cigarettes, mind you. you did not have to compensate for it. And note which cigarettes have been contraband as well as you will get punished for smoking in prison.
you have had jail warders unctuous bottled mineral H2O in to my dungeon since they know you would never drink a piss H2O which they serve us in prison. Some have smuggled cakes,roti canai, as well as all forms of foodstuff to me since they know you would not feed my dog a food they give us let alone eat it myself. One warder even phoned Anwar Ibrahim as well as became my 'courier' to send as well as embrace messages to as well as from a outside.
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolit! ics Plus |
One warder was a PKR committee member in Perak. Two younger chaps were PAS members who assimilated a demonstrations in Kedah as well as who picked up a rip gas canisters as well as threw them behind during a riot police. Another a single shouted 'reformasi' as well as gave me a clenched initial salute at your convenience he inspected my cell. He would additionally pass me cigarettes by a jail bars. Another chap opened my dungeon doorway as well as took me out for a walk when a coast was clear. Another removed my blindfold so which you could 'see some sky' (we have been all a time blindfolded as well as handcuffed at your convenience you have been brought out from a cell).
All these have been crimes as well as these people would have been in low shit if they had been caught. But they were with a means as well as they treated with colour with colour me as a comrade rather than a prisoner.
As you said, there have been great military officers as well as jail warders as well as there have been bad military officers as well as jail warders. Some have treated with colour with colour me similar to dirt. Some have taken risks which would have price them their jobs had they been caught. So let us not abuse all military officers as well as jail warders. Curse a bad ones by all means. However, some-more importantly, abuse a Members of Parliament who inspected laws in Parliament which allow Malaysian adults to be brutalised upon a forgive which a law was being upheld.
That would be articulate about a heartless demeanour which a dog was killed rather than a colour of a dog collar.
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolit! ics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment