I am pleased to share with readers, the thoughts of the visit caller to my blog site who writes under the pen-name One Malaysian. I find his thoughts on Bersih 3.0 unequivocally resounding as they come from the heart. You will find answers too to the nitpickers who zoomed in on immaterial aspects of the large picture to disprove what Bersih 3.0 symbolizes. What does it symbolize? The bravery of the people refusing to be cowed as well as browbeaten into accepting the evil machinations of an unpopular regime. Sakmongkol.
I reproduced here, the thoughts of One Malaysian , verbatim. Bless him.
Being divided from the country when it all happened authorised me to see the event with the same disinterest as the judge sees the box unfolding prior to him. you wasn't held up in the intimacy of the moment; you did not feel the tensions, the emotions. But you saw it through the eccentric eyes of the BBC as well as Al Jazeera, stating though the ASTRO censorship.
For 3 days you didn't even open my email, so you didn't see the most first-hand accounts by participants, as well as the most cinema which you subsequently received. you had to consider if the crowd was 50,000 as reported by the Police or 250,000 as claimed by Ambiga. But having carefully thought about the photos, you consider the series is closer to the Ambiga number. And this was collaborated by first-hand accounts by people whom you know as well as trust.
My thoughts have been these.
First, you contingency compensate the extensive tribute to the people of Malaysia for showing bravery to want to win their leisure in the peaceful way. Yes, there were the couple of removed incidents. We need not worry who caused them. But it is sufficient which they were unequivocally small, as well as compared to the significance of the occasion, those couple of removed incidences have been nothing.
Bersih 3.0 was fundam! entally the extemporaneous out-pouring of the frustrations of Malaysians. Ambiga as well as her dauntless squad had initiated the idea, as well as which unequivocally was all to it. The 250,000 Malaysians were not paid by anyone to participate. They knew there could be Police violence. They braved it to participate. They came from all walks of life, young as well as old, as well as included people who live in the top reaches of society, people who have been routinely unexcited to this sort of events. But they all came, as well as they sat there. This fact should discuss it Najib something. It should additionally discuss it us to take the Merdeka 69% capitulation rating of Najib with the large serving of salt. If which series were true Bersih 3.0 would have been the slightly wet squib.
Second, it is obvious which the government, as well as in sold people like Najib, Hishamuddin as well as the Police, have totally misread the public. They have believed their own lies. They did not hold which there could have been 250,000 people which the races could unite, which income could not buy loyalty. Now they know. But more importantly, the people right away comprehend they have the energy to shift the government.
Third, Najib contingency be the fool to consider which the supposed reforms which he had initiated have been an adequate answer to the wishes as well as aspirations of the people. They were not. He has to go back to the sketch board. No, you unequivocally don't consider he has the time.
Fourth, you consternation if Najib as well as Hishamuddin had ever thought the "what if" questions? What if they had authorised the people to assemble during Dataran Merdeka (perhaps you should hereafter call it Dataran Rakyat)? What if they had minimal Police presence as well as though those FRU men with chemical H2O trucks as well as rip gas guns? What if there were no barricades during all? 250,000 people would have fabricated peacefully, trampled on the little ! weed as well as done cricket unplayable for the couple of weeks, though it would have taken the wind out of Bersih's sails. He would have demonstrated which he unequivocally had meant to move about changes, as well as he proved it. He would have been the liberation hero. He would have been the renaissance PM.
No, he screwed up. He wasn't up to it. He didn't hold in the things he pronounced he would do. He had no brains, no guts as well as no good intentions. He was just the showman. A simple lady though huge PR machinery, the Police force as well as supervision backing, showed him up for what he unequivocally is the diseased man unfit to be our PM.
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
No comments:
Post a Comment