To force Nurul Izzah to desert Lembah Pantai as great as go competition an additional seat, Raja Nong Chik is blackmailing her. He is threatening to display photographs as great as videos of Nurul Izzah's 'sexual misconduct'. And Nurul Izzah's 'sex partner' is ostensible to be Tian Chua. Sheesh! Tian Chua? What an nauseous bugger. If you wish to repair up Nurul Izzah during slightest choose a better-looking male lah! What, you cruise Nurul Izzah got such bad ambience or what?
THE CORRIDORS OF POWER Raja Petra Kamarudin
you am not sure if you am a usually Malaysian Blogger who gets whacked by both sides of a political divide. This morning you beheld a single Blog, which is neither pro-government nor pro-opposition, which whacked me per a Bursa Malaysia explanation you ran a integrate of weeks ago.
So right away it appears even a center ground,atas pagaror fence sitters have been whacking me as well. That is an combined honour. Now even a 'third force' is whacking me, for sure something no alternative Malaysian Blogger has ever been celebrated with in a complete history of Blogging.
But have you beheld a single thing? The supposed whacking they give me is merely to call me a lair. They do not plead my story. They usually whack ME, a personal attack. you routinely write three to five pages, infrequently even seven pages, using into thousands of words. If you accumulate all a articles you have written over a final four years alone given 2008, it can fill a book of 600-700 pages easily.
And what do they do with a tons of report which you generate? They all omit what you have written as great as usually scream, "Liar! Liar! Liar!"
you remember behind in a early days ofMalaysia Todaywhen you wrote which you would cruise myself as hav! ing 'arr ived' when everybody in Malaysia hates me. To get a single side to hatred you as great as a alternative side to love you is easy. To get both sides to hatred you is not which easy. And right away you have a center belligerent hating me as well.
Man! Have you some-more than arrived! So concede me to swank today. Finally, you have arrived, even over what you thought was possible.
Hey, you have been articulate about Malaysia. In Malaysia, you have something calledMalaysia Boleh. The judgment ofMalaysia Bolehis which 'anything can' in Malaysia mah! What others can't do, Malaysia can do one. That isMalaysia Boleh.
Under a judgment ofMalaysia Boleh, when a single is indicted of something, a indicted is deliberate guilty as great as hence which person contingency infer his or her innocence. That is how things have been finished inMalaysia Boleh.
Let me repeat which for a birdbrains reading this. Under a judgment ofMalaysia Boleh, you have been deliberate guilty as great as you contingency infer you have been trusting if you have been indicted of something.
Now, you did not have these rules. His Majesty's Government of Malaysia has laid down these rules. And these have been a rules which have been being practical given a final couple of decades.
Do you remember Anwar Ibrahim's hearing 14 years ago in 1998? Anwar was found guilty as great as condemned to a sum of fifteen years prison (and served 6 years prior to he was released) since he unsuccessful to infer his innocence.
Yes, that's right. The decider pronounced which given Anwar unsuccessful to infer his ignorance he thus finds Anwar guilty as great as condemned him to jail.
you too was detained but hearing upon two occasions. And because did they catch me but hearing instead of charging me in court? Because, according to a government, they do no have sufficient evidence to charge me so they need! to catc h me but trial.
Okay, what happens when you have been sent to a Kamunting Detention Centre?Well, afterwards you have been brought prior to theLembaga, which acts as a sort of tribunal, as great as afterwards you need to infer to theLembagathat you should not have been detained as great as should instead be set free.
The Ministry of Home Affairs, which will additionally crop up in theLembagahearing as a sort of 'Prosecution', will disagree which you cannot be set giveaway since "the supervision believes you have been a hazard to inhabitant security".
The supervision merely believes you have been a hazard to inhabitant security. Yes, BELIEVES, which is all.
Some people hold which God exists. Some people hold which Satan exists. Some people hold which praying to trees as great as rocks will guarantee you heaven. Some people hold if you blow yourself up with dynamite as great as roar 'Allah Akbar' as you die you will be rewarded with 72 virgins. Some people hold if you put your tooth underneath your sham you will embrace money. Some people hold if you eat a sure Arabian desert lizard you will turn sexually very strong as great as can go three rounds a night, seven nights a week.
Just since you hold this does not have it true. Most times none of these ideology can be proven. But which is all a supervision needs to do to catch you but trial, a small belief. And afterwards you need to infer which you have been NOT a hazard to inhabitant security. You need to infer your innocence.
That isMalaysia Boleh. That is a way a game is played in Malaysia.
So you too have an allegation, in fact, most allegations. And how do they respond? They don't plead what you say. They do not residence a allegation. They do not discuss it their side of a story to counter what you say. They usually scream, "Liar! Liar! Liar!"
Come on! Counter what you say. If what you pronounce! d is wro ng afterwards discuss it us what a law is. Don't usually scream, "Liar! Liar! Liar!" Which partial of which essay is a lie? Point it out. A blanket "Liar! Liar! Liar!" is not great enough. Which partial is a lie? Tell us.
Hey, Anwar Ibrahim was condemned to prison terms of fifteen years since he unsuccessful to infer his innocence. So infer your innocence. Don't usually scream, "Liar! Liar! Liar!" Where is which distortion in my article? Show us!
When you revealed which a Honorary Mongolian Consul to Malaysia, Syed Abdul Rahman Alhabshi, personally told me which he has evidence very damaging to Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak, Syed Rahman screamed "Liar! Liar! Liar!"
Which partial is a distortion -- a partial about which he had met me, or a partial about what he had personally told me? Which partial is a lie? Tell us! He did not encounter me alone. When he met me there were most alternative people around. And all these people additionally listened what he told me.
Syed Rahman never denied meeting me. He never denied what he told me. He never denied which there were most alternative people there which day. He usually screamed, "Liar! Liar! Liar!" Which partial is a lie?
you wrote a story about a problems in a Attorney-General's Chambers. you associated a story per a conflict between Solicitor-General II Datuk Yusof Zainal Abiden as great as Attorney-General Tan Sri Abdul Ghani Patail. The AG wanted to repair me up upon built charges whilst his boys did not agree.
And a response? Again, "Liar! Liar! Liar!" Then what happens? Today, Yusof Zainal Abiden is representing Anwar Ibrahim as a single of his lawyers. So, am you still lying? Or has my 'lie' right away been proven true?
A couple of years back, you wrote about a links between IGP Musa Hassan as great as a Chinese black market as great as crime syndicate. Again, "Liar! Liar! Liar!" Then what happens? A couple of comparison police officers have right away co! me out i nto a open to confirm a claim as great as a little have even joined a Opposition.
So, is it still a lie?
you wrote about a RM8 billion MAS liaison as great as how Tajuddin Ramli was educated to do a deal to cover a RM30-billion foreign exchange failure of a mid-1990s.
And a response? Again, "Liar! Liar! Liar!" Then what happens? Today, Affidavits have been being filed in justice which confirms what you had written. So which partial is a distortion then? Thus far it appears similar to what you pronounced is being reliable in court. So which partial is a lie? Tell us!
Man, you can go upon as great as on. you can give you tons of examples where my supposed 'lies' in a future get reliable as a truth. Do you really need me to go upon or can you stop here as great as take a little time to gloat?
you do not caring how history remembers me as long as you am remembered as a person whose 'lies' all get proven as a law in a end. you usually wish to be remembered for which as great as for zero else. Put this upon my inscription when you die:'The liar who told a truth'.
The Opposition is no reduction guilty of this crime. It is not usually those in a supervision who roar "Liar! Liar! Liar!" when an claim is made against them. Don't lah usually roar "Liar! Liar! Liar!" Point out which partial of a claim is a lie. Even a Opposition likes to usually deny, deny, repudiate but telling us where a supposed distortion is. Both sides have been a same.
Never mind. Today they deny. Today they roar "Liar! Liar! Liar!" Tomorrow, a supposed distortion is proven true. It happens each time but fail. you can means to wait for since you know which in a finish what you contend gets proven as fact. They can't run away from that. The law regularly prevails in a end. And afterwards you can swank as great as say, "I told you so!"
As you said, concede me to gloat. you have warranted a right to gloat. What you cont! end is r egularly proven loyal in a end. So roar "Liar! Liar! Liar!" all you want. Today's 'lies' have been starting to be tomorrow's fact. Trust me upon this.
Okay, today let me have an additional allegation. Yes, today you have been again starting to roar "Liar! Liar! Liar!" Tomorrow, this 'lie' is starting to be proven. Trust me. you will eat my beret if you am wrong.
Raja Nong Chik Zainal Abidin wants to competition a Parliament chair of Lembah Pantai. However, he is worried which a incumbent, Nurul Izzah Anwar, is starting to beat him flat. So he does not wish to face Nurul Izzah. He wants Nurul Izzah to behind off as great as competition an additional seat.
To force Nurul Izzah to desert Lembah Pantai as great as go competition an additional seat, Raja Nong Chik is blackmailing her. He is threatening to display photographs as great as videos of Nurul Izzah's 'sexual misconduct'. And Nurul Izzah's 'sex partner' is ostensible to be Tian Chua.
Sheesh! Tian Chua? What an nauseous bugger. If you wish to repair up Nurul Izzah during slightest choose a better-looking male lah! What, you cruise Nurul Izzah got such bad ambience or what?
you was with Nurul Izzah in Canberra, Australia, to encounter a Australian Members of Parliament. Her husband as great as my mother were in an additional city during which time. At slightest if you lay which Raja Petra Kamarudin is Nurul Izzah's sex partner it is some-more believable. you am improved seeking than Tian Chua by far, even if you do contend so myself.
Then you can turn a story which this is because RPK as great as Anwar Ibrahim have had a falling out -- it is associated to a Nurul Izzah as great as Raja Petra sex scandal.
Aiyoh! These Umno buggers! Want to turn but don't know how to spin. And when you display them they usually know how to roar "Liar! Liar! Liar!" They have been not able to plead what you say.
Okay, let's see those photos as great as videos whi! ch Raja Nong Chik has in jeopardy to display if Nurul Izzah does not desert Lembah Pantai. you can assure you of a single thing. If they come out with Nurul Izzah's 'sex' photos as great as videos, Raja Nong Chik is not usually starting to lose a choosing but he is starting to lose his deposition as well. Try as great as see what will happen.
Kalau kata 'Melayu bodoh' marah. If not Melayu bodoh afterwards Melayu what? Melayu pandai? Hah, Melayu bodoh macam lembu! Just know how to roar "Liar! Liar! Liar!" Lain tak tahu. Pergi mampus lah. Semua bodoh macam lembu. Buat malu Raja je. Raja apa macam ni?
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment