Here is some-more revelation from a eremite scholars themselves. This a single is supposedly a topic written by a single Arab scholar, a certain Sheikh Mustafa Mohamed Rashid who submitted a PhD topic to a Al Azhar University in Cairo.
Sheikh Mustafa Mohamed Rashid argues which a hijab is not a order of Islam.
Here is a essay from an Arab newspaper. The title says "Al Hijaab laysa fareedat Islameeyah" which equates to "The hijab is not obligatory in Islam".
Folks, jangan marah saya ok. Ini bukan saya yang cakap. This is what a eremite scholars have been saying. Itu joke a academician who submitted his PhD topic upon a theme to a Al Azhar University - a foremost core of learning for a Sunni sacrament in a complete world.
Here is an English version of Sheikh Mustafa's findings. You can poke Yahoo or Google for "Sheikh Mustafa Mohamed Rashid's PhD thesis" as well as we can double check a essay yourself. Note a difference in red.
"Al Azhar endorsed Sheikh Mustafa Mohamed Rashid's PhD topic upon Sharia as well as Law for which he obtained a class ofexcellence,where he settled which hijab is not an Islamic order (fard),and which a interpretation (tafseer! ) of a v erses (ayat) as well as a resources during which they appeared has led to a widespread misunderstanding about a supposed 'Islamic Hijab' denoting covering a head,of which there is positively no discuss in a Quran.
Yet a little have misconstrued a vigilant as well as correct interpretation of a Sharia, refusing a proof as well as sequence of its appearance, abandoning a proper methods of citing as well as interpreting of a verses (ayat), their historical credentials as well as reason for them. They have done so possibly intentionally, or with good goal though with miss of a essential analytical savvy.
This hijab emanate imposed itself upon a Islamic as well as non-Islamic psyche, as well as to illustrate apropos a defining factor, meaning, as well as inlet of a Islamic conviction to non-Muslims, which led a little non-Islamic nations to cruise it a divisive domestic statement. In consequence to a resulting friction, a little female students have been expelled from universities as well as jobs, usually due to their adherence to this fake belief, thereby attaching to Islam a non extant requirement.
So inconsistent as well as misled have a proofs of a supporters of a hijab speculation been, which it would infrequently take a form of khimar or jalabeeb, which distanced them from what they meant by conduct cover, which is indicative of their restrictive set of mind. (My comments : ha ha ha ha ! ! )
'Hijab' was referred to in hymn (ayah) 53 of al Ahzab, where it signifies 'wall' or 'what prevents view' as well as it was in regards to pristine "ummuhat al mo'mineen" where a "hajib" is to be placed in in between them as well as any men.
As for hymn (ayah) 31 of Al Khimar - Sourrat al Noor, which is additionally a surplus claim, as a vigilant here is a covering of a breast as well as neck - a credentials here is a covering of a breast whose bearing is un-Islamic,and not what is right away understood by hijab for a head.
And in regards to a historical credentials of hymn (ayah) 59 of Sourrat al AHzab was to heed in in between a pristine as well as a random whores as well as slaves.
Finally, in a mis-use of a Hadith about Asma'a, daughter of Abu Bakr, when she walked in upon a soothsayer (pbuh)s gathering, as well as he ordered her to not expose her face or palms - this Hadithis not a binding Hadith, as it is a single of al AHaad as well as not a single of a consistent, or a continuous confirmed." - End of article.
Well folks, your friendly Blogger OutSyed The Box (thats me) has been observant this for years right away as well as without even carrying to go to Al Azhar University which is located in a Club of Doom.
I can additionally discuss it we which a Book of Corinthians in a Bible speaks of a headcover for women. It is a Biblical teaching. Dont hold me? Then who is this in a picture ? It is not Cik Jah. This is a late Mother Theresa wearing her heading hijab. It is a Biblical teaching. (Please dont contend which Mother Theresa took tip night classes during Al Azhar University).
There is positively no discuss of any headcover in a Quran. I have said it before though not in my Blog, thatif any one can uncover me a hymn in a Quran which says which a woman's hair is her "aurat" or nakedness then I will eat which page. Todate no a single has been able to uncover me any such thing in a Quran.
People have already argued which a PhD topic is not Islamic Law. These people do not understand what Sheikh Mustafa Mohamed Rasheed has done. He is observant which a belief which hijab is partial of Islamic Law has no basis. He says there is no evidence. The some-more relevant question is : if it is not in a Quran as well as a alternative references have been questionable, then where does Islamic Law come from?
Laws made by your the one preferred eremite scholar, by your mazhab or by your tok guru CANNOT be Islamic Law. Dont get confused.
Posted bySyed Akbar Ali
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Co! urtesy o f Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment