Today, such people -- such as those pirates in Somalia -- would be wanted down by the American soldiers. 1,000 years ago, you had tosembahthem or else get put to death. See how times have changed? And manners shift as times change. Hence, the manners of currently might be viewed as stupid 1,000 years from right away only how you perspective the manners of 1,000 years ago as silly.
NO HOLDS BARRED
Raja Petra Kamarudin
"Remember, remember, the fifth of November," you used to sing when you were kids. The fifth of Nov refers to 5th Nov 1605, the date of the 'Gunpowder Plot', when Guy Fawkes as well as squad attempted to blow up Parliament.
The King, James VI, was ostensible to be opening the new session of Parliament upon which day. Hence the reformists wanted to kill hundreds of birds with the single stone -- blow up Parliament as well as kill the King plus all the Members of Parliament in the single great explosion.
Well, you suppose which is the single way to get rid of the supervision when you can't do it by the ballot box. Now, please do not begin getting any ideas. you am not suggesting this is what you do. Anyway, Parliament House in Kuala Lumpur does not have underground sewers.
The following year, in 1606, Britain upheld the mutiny law which not only done it the crime to blow up the King, though even if you only pronounced nasty things about him you could be arrested as well as punished. And the smallest chastisement for mutiny would be to cut off your ears. The misfortune would be you get put to death.
You see, even right up the late 1800s, Europeans still believed which Monarchs were allocated by God. Hence to verbalise opposite the Monarch meant you spoke opposite God Himself. And 'God's punishment' was severe indeed. In fact, they c! ould eve n put you upon hearing without the good of any witnesses or witnesses could testify opposite you in tip so which no the single will discover your identity
Such was the seriousness of mutiny opposite the King, such as what Karpal Singh is right away confronting for his perfidious action of mutiny opposite the Sultan of Perak. Incidentally, whilst upon the subject of the Sultan of Perak, read what the Sultan of Pahang said, as reported by Bernama.
*******************************
Freedom of debate contingency imitate with manners - Sultan of Pahang
(Bernama) -- The leisure of debate as well as countenance in the country should imitate with the constitution, pronounced the Sultan of Pahang Sultan Ahmad Shah.
This right includes the leisure of countenance in an organisation where the member is entitled to an opinion say, though inside of the bounds of the manners adopted, he added.
*******************************
Yes, which was what the Sultan of Pahang pronounced -- leisure of debate as well as countenance should imitate with the constitution. And you take it you remember which the integrate of days ago the Crown Prince to the Perak bench additionally done the statement regarding not articulate about Islam.
The title of my article is 'Rules change'. That's right. Rules change. They shift according to epoch as well as region. Time as well as place makes what is right turn wrong as well as what is wrong turn right. That is what you wish to talk about.
In 1066, William, the Duke of Normandy, additionally well known as William the Conqueror or the Bastard of Normandy, invaded England. Now, he was not the King of France. The King of France was someone else. The English King afterwards was Harold Godwinson, the Earl of Essex as well as the most powerful of the English Lords.
Battle! in betw een the Saxons as well as Normans in 1066
Now, since was William called the Bastard of Normandy? you know the English call him that. you do not know either the French do as well. Anyway, the English call all French bastards, as well as clamp versa, the French call the English the same thing. Some French even refer to condoms as English caps.
Anyway, from what small story you have read, William was called the Bastard of Normandy not since he acted similar to Barisan Nasional people though since he was essentially the bastard. His father was Robert, the Duke of Normandy, whilst it is not as well transparent about his mother, Herleva, who was the daughter of Fulbert of Falaise, who might have been the tanner or embalmer. Whatever it might be, Earls, Lords, Dukes as well as Kings had most mistresses in those days, there was no family planning yet, so most bastards sprung up all over the place.
As you said, William invaded England as well as the great conflict was fought at Hastings. King Harold was killed in which conflict (he got an arrow by his eye) as well as William took over the bench as the initial Norman King of England.
King Harold dies with an arrow by the eye
Now, it contingency be noted which they were called Normans since they were Norsemen or people from the North, definition therefore which they were of Viking descent. And these Vikings used to travel to England as well as France to rape, plunder, kill as well as grab lands which did not go to them. They afterwards allocated themselves as Dukes as well as Lords of the land. And which was where William the Bastard came from, the long line of Viking pirates, rapists, plunderers as well as murderers.
Only that, long ago, they were not called pirates. They were called warriors. And raping as well as rapine was not the crime. It was the rewards of! war. So ldiers did not get paid the income then. They warranted their keep by raping as well as rapine the defeated enemy. And massacring soldiers who had surrendered was not murder. It was to compromise the problem of jail overcrowding. How do you squeeze 10,000 rivalry soldiers in the jail built for 100?
The bottom line is: pirates, rapists, plunderers as well as murderers, mostly illegitimate children, stole land which belonged to others. They afterwards declared themselves as Rulers allocated by God. And afterwards they upheld mutiny laws to make it the crime to verbalise bad about them.
Somali pirates
Today, such people -- such as those pirates in Somalia -- would be wanted down by the American soldiers. 1,000 years ago, you had tosembahthem or else get put to death. See how times have changed? And manners shift as times change. Hence, the manners of currently might be viewed as stupid 1,000 years from right away only how you perspective the manners of 1,000 years ago as silly.
What is leisure of debate currently was fraud as well as mutiny 1,000 years ago. What is fraud as well as mutiny currently would be leisure of debate 1,000 years from now. So by what yardstick do you measure the Sultan of Pahang's interpretation of leisure of debate according to the news report above?
1,000 years ago, what William the Bastard pronounced were difference from the great as well as correct King. Today, you consider which William was an idiot. How would you perspective the difference of today's Kings as well as Monarchs 1,000 from now?
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakata! n Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment