Gobind upset A-G vindicated MACC


The Attorney-General's preference is inconsistent with a findings of a Royal Commission of Inquiry, says a DAP lawyer.
PETALING JAYA: DAP lawyer Gobind Singh Deo pronounced today which he felt "very upset" which a Attorney-General's (A-G) Chambers has privileged a 3 Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) officers implicated in a death of former domestic aide Teoh Beng Hock.
"I think this preference flies squarely in a face of a Royal Commission of Inquiry [RCI] report. The findings by a RCI were clear: there was enough basement for movement to be taken, includingdisciplinary movement as good as rapist charges," pronounced Gobind, a Puchong MP, who has been theTeoh family's main legal representative.
Earlier in Parliament today, Minister in a Prime Minister's Department Nazri Abdul Aziz pronounced in a written reply to Gopeng MP Lee Boon Chye which a A-G had found which a MACC officers had not committed any offence either under a Penal Code or a MACC Act.
Gobind pronounced which this ultimate announcement shows which a government does not respect a findings of a RCI at all.
"What a A-G has finished obviously reflects really badly upon a RCI proceedings. If you have spent time as good as effort in establishing a RCI, which investigated a matter as good as done certain findings formed upon justification as good as sworn declare statements, it should have been acted upon," he said.
He additionally criticised a A-G for not supplying any concrete reasons for a case to be closed.
"There is no reason for a 3 persons declared [in a RCI findings] to be cleared. All you have is a really general matter saying sa! y there was no evidence. I have asked but they could not discuss it me who was being investigated or what was being investigated," Gobind said.
He pronounced he had previously suggested which a A-G could use Section 330 of a Penal Code for a offence of "voluntarily causing harm to extort confession" to assign those group with pushing Teoh to suicide.
When contacted, Teoh's fiance Soh Cher Wei, who married Teoh posthumously in 2009, usually said: "No comment. I'm so sorry."
Open verdict
Teoh, 30, was a domestic aide of Selangor executive legislature part of Ean Yong Hian Wah. He was found passed upon Jul 16, 2009, upon a fifth-floor corridor of Plaza Masalam in Shah Alam after he was questioned overnight by a MACC officers upon a 14th floor.
Teoh was a declare into investigations of alleged abuse of state funds by Ean Yong, who had given been privileged of any wrongdoing by a MACC.
The RCI, which was set up after a coroner's justice returned an "open verdict", found which extreme assign in interrogation methods drove Teoh to commit suicide.
Inspector-General of Police Ismail Omar had pronounced which there are no laws to assign a 3 MACC officers, while a MACC pronounced it would deal with them internally by environment up a special inquisitive team.
The five-man RCI panel, headed by afterwards sovereign justice decider James Foong, had singled out a 3 officers who were involved in a interrogations. They were Selangor MACC emissary directorHishamuddin Hashim as good as his subordinates Mohd Anuar Ismail as good as Mohd Ashraf Mohd Yunus.
Contrary to a RCI inform which declared a 3 men, a Bar Council which actively participated in a RCI had endorsed which 5 MACC officers be investigated for culpable homicide.
The 5 officers include Hishamuddin, Mohd Anuar as good as Mohd Ashraf as good as Selangor MACC investigations chief, Hairul Ilham Hamzah, as good as Klang MACC! assista nt enforcement officer Zulkefly Aziz.
The Bar had endorsed which a 5 be investigated under Section 304A of a Penal Code for causing a death of Teoh around negligence.
On Oct twenty-four final year, Nazri pronounced which Attorney-General "was not compelled" to aspire to a case, due to miss of justification as good as declare accounts, but will do so if brand new justification surfaces.
Read More @ Source



More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz

No comments: