April 22, 2012
Malaysia's Muddled Experience with Islamic Law
Guest Writer: Rusman
We all know which Malaysia has turn some-more as good as some-more 'Islamic' over a last 20 years. By 'Islamic' you mean not which people have turn some-more inclined towards personal piety, to essay for substantiating probity as good as mercy upon a Earth, etc. Rather you have been referring to a outmost dimension of Islam whereby you see institutionalized sacrament crystallized in a form of an central bureaucracy which seeks to legitimize itself by exerting social, cultural as good as political change upon Malaysia.
There have been assorted reasons for this. Certainly there has been a global resurgence of Islamic identity brought upon in different countries for different reasons as a response to modernity, secularism, pretentious consumerism, colonialism as good as neocolonialism, export of Saudi ideology saved by Saudi petrodollars. you could go on.
In Malaysia a little of these factors have been additionally relevant. But you can additionally attribute a increase to a concerted bid by a supervision as good as statute celebration to emanate as good as make firm a array of executive institutions written in partial to flex Malaysia's muscles as a complicated though very Islamic country. And behind these ostensibly unprejudiced public routine decisions was certainly a little political motives driven by a competition in in in between UMNO as good as PAS to capture a conservative Malay Muslim voter by being seen as a true defender of a faith.
As of late a rhetoric around Malaysia's supposed Muslim identity has reached a turn of a irrationality. Over a last couple of years you have seen rulings such as a banning of yoga, a banning of non-Muslims using a word Allah, a enlist! ment of area Imams as virtual eremite police with a energy to arrest. In Kedah, a state governed by PAS under a ensign of Pakatan Rakyat, a statute which makes Islamic fatwas unchallengeable in a justice of law is nonetheless an additional example of a gradual intrusion of Islamic law into a space of Malaysia's secular authorised system.
As an outward spectator of Malaysian governing body a downright confusing. Where does eremite management lie in Malaysia? With a sovereign supervision as good as a most agencies as good as bureaus of religion? With a sultan? With a state governments? With imams? What have been a authorised implications of a fatwa in Malaysia?
Tamir Moustafa, Associate Professor during Simon Fraser University in Canada has a stirring article inLaw as good as Social Inquiry entitled "Islamic Law, Women's Rights as good as Popular Legal Consciousness in Malaysia. [Tamir Moustafa: Islamic Law in Malaysia]
His article raises a little valuable insights about a story as good as development of Islamic law in Malaysia to better assimilate a little of a questions you lift above. Moustafa's design is to assimilate if there is a disconnect in in in between "fundamental unpractical beliefs in Islamic authorised speculation as good as how those concepts have been understood in between lay Muslims in Malaysia."
It is critical to conclude a theoretical horizon of Moustafa's argument- which is to differentiate in in in between sharia as good as fiqh. Sharia is a Divine Law as suggested by God. Fiqh is a male made laws as good as regulations formed upon lawful sources of Divine Law: 1) a Quran 2) traditions of a Prophet Muhammed 3) qiyas (analogical reasoning) as good as 4) ijma' (scholarly consensus). [In tangible actuality a methodology is some-more challenging which this as good as takes into comment much some-more together with local law in bet! ween oth er things; however for a purposes of this blog we'll keep things simple].
Moustafa aims to find out how good do Malaysian Muslims assimilate a disproportion in in in between a Sharia as good as a laws which they follow in Malaysia which have been pronounced to be Sharia, though which have been in tangible actuality fiqh, by definition, because, as he demonstrates, they have been conjunction formed upon any direct precedent from a Quran or a Sunnah.
Citing William Roff's 1967The Origins of Malay Nationalism
A direct effect of colonial order was thus to encourage a concentration of doctrinal as good as executive eremite management in a hands of a hierarchy of officials directly dependent upon a sultans for their in front of as good as power. . . . By a second decade of a twentieth century Malaysia was versed with endless machine for ruling Islam. (pg 72-73)
Moustafa explains which in a span of reduction than 100 years there emerged in Malaysia a massive eremite bureaucracy intended to centrally control control of a a eremite hold up of Malaysia (as opposed to withdrawal it decentralized as good as autonomous).
Furthermore what is truly intolerable about this institutionalization as good as codification of a laws ruling a Islamic sacrament is which theShari'a Criminal Procedure Act (1997) as good as a Shari'a Civil Procedure Act (1997) steal during length from a horizon of a polite courts in Malaysia. Moustafa says which "[t]he drafting committee literally copied a codes of procession wholesale, making usually teenager changes where needed."
Citing Abdul Hamid Mohamed, former Chief Justice of a Federal Court, who was upon a drafting committee for assorted sovereign as good as state shari'a procedures acts in a 1980s as good as 1990s:
We motionless to take a existing laws which were right away in make use of in a common law courts as a basement to work on, remove or substitute a objectionable parts, ad! d whatev er indispensable to be added, make them Shari'ah-compliance [sic] as good as have them enacted as laws. In fact, a routine as good as which "methodology," if it can be so called, go upon until today.
The supplies of a Shari'ah criminal as good as polite procession enactments/act are, to a large extent, a same as those used in a common law courts. A connoisseur in law from any common law nation celebration of a mass a "Shari'ah" law of procession in Malaysia would find which he already knows during least 80% of them . . . a common law lawyer celebration of a mass them for a initial time will find which he is celebration of a mass something familiar, territory by section, even word for word. Yet they have been "Islamic law." (Mohamed 2008, 12, 10)27
Moustafa adds which Abdul Hamid Mohamed himself, as good as most other authorised crew involved in a codification of Islamic authorised procedures in Malaysia DO NOT have any grave education in Islamic jurisprudence. Let me repeat. The laws which oversee Islam in Malaysia were codified by most people who have no grave precision in Islamic Jurisprudence.
I'm starting to assimilate a single of a reasons since a issue of management as good as Islamic law in Malaysia is so confusing. It's since a people who set up a complement in a initial place were themselves expected confused as good as had no real idea what they were during from a standpoint of Islamic jurisprudence. Whether intentionally or unknowingly, their lack of familiarity with a topics they were opposed was a single reason since Islamic authorised speculation was subverted or abandoned even though these people probably felt they were operative for a consequence of Islam.
Moustafa's conclusion is:
The eremite councils, a shari'a courts, as good as a entire executive equipment have been "Islamic" in name, though in function they bear little resemblance to anything which existed prior to a British arrived. A low antithesis is thus during ! play: a legitimacy of a eremite administration rests upon a emotive energy of Islamic symbolism, but a principal mode of organization as good as operation is essentially secure in a Weberian state [i.e which state which wishes to have a corner of [violent] control over a people].
We'll examination a formula of a consult Moustafa conducted in Malaysia upon a after post. For right away you think it's worthwhile to discuss what these contribution mean for Islam as good as Muslims in Malaysia.
Politics in reserve (and governing body play an critical purpose no doubt), when Malaysians fastener with a trials as good as tribulations of how to be a good, putting in service Muslim in a complicated world, they have been not usually opposed a challenging adversary in a prevailing materialistic, secular, consumer-driven culture of consumption as good as instant gratification which is encroaching upon every open society.
In further they have to confront incredibly assertive and, a single might argue, ill-conceived bureaucracy of Islamic affairs which exists via Malaysia. Given which most of a laws enshrined in this bureaucracy have been not even remotely formed upon derivations from normal Islamic sources though have been some-more expected vestiges of British colonial law "adapted" to an Islamic language, what kind of Islam have been Malaysians supposed to be following? Furthermore if a people entrusted with a controls of these organizations have been themselves sick competent to lift out their tasks, afterwards where have been Malaysian Muslims to turn as good as what recourse do they have when a complement (inevitably) fails to work in a only as good as truly Islamic manner?
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
No comments:
Post a Comment