The Bar Council, which played an active purpose in a RCI in to Teoh Beng Hock's death, has expressed beating with a preference to transparent a 3 MACC officers implicated.
PETALING JAYA: The attorney-geeneral must clarify a preference to transparent 3 Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) officers endangered in a genocide of former domestic help Teoh Beng Hock by a Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI). Bar Council vice-president Christopher Leong pronounced a A-G Abdul Gani Patail should additionally insist to a open in item because such a preference was made.
"I note which a information came from Minister in a Prime Minister's Department Nazri Abdul Aziz, perhaps a attorney-general himself can directly clarify a decision. Explain in more item because a preference was made," pronounced Leong, who was a lead counsel representing a Bar during a RCI.
"This is another beating in a long list of disappointments in this case; not only for a family of Teoh Beng Hock but additionally for all endangered members of a public," he added.
Leong pronounced which throughout a lengthy investigations by a RCI, there was "ample evidence" of illegal conduct by MACC officers, as well as movement should have been taken.
"The RCI had unclosed plenty justification of prejudicial as well as unlawful conduct upon a part of a MACC officers. The findings of a RCI upon such justification are clear," he added.
He pronounced which even if a A-G was wavering with charging a 3 men declared for failing in duty homicide, during a really least there was sufficient justification to move about a case of giving fake sworn statement in justice as well as fabricat! ing just ification to be used in court.
"The RCI found which a relevant MACC officers had lied to a RCI, or had fabricated evidence. At a minimum, these MACC officers should be charged under Section 191 or 192 of a Penal Code," he added.
(Section 191 is a offence of "giving fake evidence" whilst Section 192 deals with "fabricating fake evidence").
'No respect for RCIs'
Meanwhile, former Kuala Lumpur CID arch Mat Zain Ibrahim pronounced which a A-G does not respect RCIs.
Meanwhile, former Kuala Lumpur CID arch Mat Zain Ibrahim pronounced which a A-G does not respect RCIs.
"What happened to a recommendations? Gani doesn't care a damn about a RCI commissioners nor has he any respect for them in annoy of him meaningful they were appointed by a Agong," he wrote in a letter to The Malaysian Insider.
Mat Zain pronounced this was a second time Gani has failed to action upon recommendations by a commission of inquiry, a first being a failure to action upon a prior RCI in 2007 probing allegations which appointments of judges were fixed.
Teoh, 30, was a domestic help of Selangor senior manager legislature member Ean Yong Hian Wah. He was found dead upon July 16, 2009, upon a fifth-floor mezzanine of Plaza Masalam in Shah Alam after he was questioned overnight by a MACC officers upon a 14th floor.
The five-man RCI panel, headed by then sovereign justice judge James Foong, had singled out a 3 officers who were concerned in a interrogations. They were Selangor MACC emissary director Hishamuddin Hashim as well as his subordinates Mohd Anuar Ismail as well as Mohd Ashraf Mohd Yunus.
Contrary to a RCI report which declared a 3 men, a Bar Council which actively participated in a RCI had endorsed which 5 MACC officers be investigated for failing in duty homicide.
The 5 officers embody Hishamuddin, Mohd Anuar as well as Mohd Ashraf as well as Selangor MACC investigations chief, Hairul Ilham Hamzah, as well as Klang MACC assistant enforcement officer Zulkefly Aziz.
The Bar had endor! sed whic h a 5 be investigated under Section 304A of a Penal Code for causing a genocide of Teoh via negligence.
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment