I did not wish to criticism upon the so-called 'Big debate" initially even yet you did watch it over TV. But after many friends have asked me for my opinion, you suspicion you would only write the reduced criticism upon the debate.
I suspicion there was unequivocally zero to shout about. After watching both speakers speak, you have the feeling of in attendance 2 political ceramah during the single shot.
Having pronounced that, you suspicion it was still the great attempt by both to come together as well as talk civilly upon their stand, nonetheless much of what was discussed was approach off the topic.
The same , however cannot be pronounced of the narrow-minded crowd. you have all along mentioned which Malaysians have been as well partisan, as well as once you have been being as well partisan, you will be blinded by perfect loyalty as well as would support blindly whatever your side is doing, including something which may not be good.
Then there is someone whose partisanship has left overboard. you refer to the young woman snarling as well as screaming ( to those who may not have seen what snarling is like, only go to watch the video or photos upon the net, there have been plenty upon this) while asking questions from the floor.
If there is an image from which discuss which would stick to my mind, it was which snarling look, the idealisation showcase of blind partisanship; whatever alternative side does contingency be wrong, as the result the emotional outburst.
Malaysians should not be as well partisan. Being inactive is essentially the single of the many important mandate of the 2 celebration system. If the single side is no good, flog it out. If after the alternative side come to power as well as also no good, you can flog it out again as well as give the mandate behind to the first. If so doing, you will settle the culture of competitiveness among the 2 sides; as well as when there is competition, there will be improvement. That is the essence of the 2 ce! lebratio n system.
The woman was harping upon the law coercion ( the towing of illegally parked cars during night) during night in Penang. Her point being which during night there is less traffic as well as so illegal parking should be allowed. But law is law, as well as to cultivate the culture of law- abiding citizens, there is unequivocally no alternative approach yet to enforce law in the fair manner, as well as law coercion should have no time limit . In overseas, many the time you can see someone who would not cross the road as long as the walking light is red, even yet there is no traffic upon the road; this is called law abiding, as well as it takes firm coercion of law to cultivate this.
In putting across such ill-conceived logic, she has essentially unprotected the weak side of BN component parties all can be negotiated, even law-breaking acts. Small acts often lead to bigger things, as well as which is because there is this culture of "BN Boleh" .
I hope in future , members of both parties should refrain from display their nauseous side. It only does not attraction them to those who have been nonpartisan, those upon the center belligerent who constitute the majority whom their parties leaders have been trying to woe.
A snarling demeanour (courtesy of wikipedia)
Like this:
MANSUH ISA - Bermain bersama 'Water Cannon'
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
No comments:
Post a Comment