The lottery of Malaysian justice

A integrate of years ago I was repelled by the astringency of the judgment handed down to the male convicted of hidden 11 cans of drink value the total of RM70 see my post 5 years jail for RM70 theft where I wrote:

That's an over-the-top complicated handed judgement by the Yang Ariff. It's monstrously out of suit to the seriousness of the crime, more so when we consider heavier shit being committed by 'heavy metal' ar$ eh#les in this country, none of whom has to illustrate far been found guilty.

As the Star Online reported in the news article Jobless male gets 5yrs for hidden some beer, the offender was Zulhaidi Hamzah, an unemployed man.

I wonder whether the astringency of his judgment had to do with him being the Muslim as well as the items he stole were alcoholic drinks?

Contrast his judgment with someone who 'stole' hundreds of millions as well as live in the f* palace built from dirty money.

And for 'divine' sentences, what about those who would unbelievably make use of dirty income (or accept dodgy all expenses paid trip) to fly to Mecca upon the Haj. Won't the sins be tripled?

The second box reported by the Star Online was Shorter jail time for twin Court. Extracts have been as follows:

The Court of Appeal has upheld the conviction of dual brothers concerned in the arson during the Metro Tabernacle church in Desa Melawati dual years ago.

The court, however, unanimously hold that the five-year jail tenure handed down by the Kuala Lumpur Sessions Court opposite Raja Muhammad ! Faizal R aja Ibrahim, 26, as well as Raja Muhammad Idzham, 24, was "excessive". It marked d! own the judgment to the two-year jail term.


Now consider this schooled judgement: Justice Low pronounced whilst open interest called for the halt judgment in criminal cases, the justice additionally considered the actuality that the dual were first-time offenders as well as of the relatively immature age during the time of the offence.

"We were additionally informed that as regards the repairs to the church, the Government has allocated RM500,000 to restore the church to the strange state. We have been of the perspective that custodial judgment is required but the five-year jail tenure is excessive," pronounced the judge.


I support the judge for his in accord with as well as reduction critical sentences for first time offencers, generally those of the younger age (due to their immaturity), yet I'm not as well certain about how the government's financial allocation to assistance restore the church could lessen the astringency of the crime.

But read this one, additionally in the Star Online - Vietnamese punished for chopping down gaharu the first in Penang

A 23-year-old Vietnamese was condemned to 6 years' jail and fined RM200,000 in default 6 months' jail for felling gaharu (agarwood) trees during the Forest Reserve in Nibong Tebal last month the first in Penang.

I would consider the crime by the Vietnamese to be reduction critical that the previous case, of arson associated with religious (or political) loathing opposite the place of worship. But WTF, poor Viet received the judgment 3 times more critical than the arsonists. And if he doesn't cough up the RM200,000 excellent (which we can safely predict he won't be able to) his judgment will run for an extra 6 months.

Then there was UMNO Minister of Culture, Youth & Sports, Datu! k Mokhta r Hashim, who w! as convi cted of murder of an additional UMNO bloke (sometime in 1983?), condemned to death, had his judgment commuted to hold up imprisonment, as well as then pardoned as well as set free. All nicely manmanlai.

He, similar to other UMNO ministers who went to prison, masuk-keluar lokap with their Datukship intact. Just imagine morning hurl call, like: Prisoner Datuk 12155 Kaytee Mok wakakaka.

It would appear that justice in Malaysia is just similar to Empat Ekor. You lose many of the time, but if we have the 'gods' with you, then we win see my post during KTemoc Kongsamkok titled Dream No 2 the God spoke, really precisely! wakakaka.
Read More @ Source

Part 1: Norlaila Othman, wife of ISA Detainee Mat Sah Satray

Part 1/3 of the testimony of Norlaila Othman, the wife of Internal Security Act (ISA) Detainee, Mat Sah garbage bin Mohd Satray. Mat Sah is being hold underneath the ISA given April 18, 2002 upon the pretext of terrorism. It is now Jul 2009. Mat Sah is currently hold in Kamunting Detention Centre, as well as has been accused of being part of the Jemaah Islamiyyah (JI) network seeking to overpower the Government of Malaysia by force. The Government to-date has not produced any evidence to justify the allegations, as well as Mat Sahs legal appeals have been rejected in the Malaysian courts. Mat Sah continues to be hold without charge. He denies the allegations. Norlaila Othman gave an account of the difficulties faced by the family whilst Mat Sah is being incarcerated. She questions the arbitrariness of apprehension underneath the ISA when it is not transparent w! hy as we ll as how some detainees thick with together were released as others go on to languish in prison. Is it since Norlaila Othman, as well as her husband have been defiant to the on-going demands of the Government of Malaysia? There have been 3 parts to this video message. Video by R. Vijay Kumar, Citizen Journalist EnvironsEagles - Soaring to serve in the becoming different environment cj.my

Video Rating: 5 / 5

More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz

No comments: