Thank goodness the Sodomy II hearing has ended, not which we had dedicatedly followed the twists as well as turns through the prolonged tortuous course. we have no interest in the private hold up of Anwar Ibrahim, alleged or otherwise - none of my business. It's his politics, opening as well as policies which we keep an eye on.
Who then is the leader as well as crook of the trial's outcome?
I leave which to the experts yet we do know of usually the single loser, the Bench!
Alas, really few Malaysians have conviction in the autonomy as well as integrity of the judiciary, as well as can we censure the majority?
As the Court discharged the charges opposite Anwar Ibrahim, the Pakatan 'experts' are already analyzing, right away get this, WHY the justice had not found him guilty, instead of awaiting which the result was, as Karpal Singh predicted, the natural result for the prosecutor's paucity of plain evidence.
Look, even Anwar Ibrahim himself was surprised by the verdict.
For an e.g. of the deep set guess by most about the motives of the court, as well as by the alleged nexus, thus of "Anwar Ibrahim", see Charles Santiago'sSeeing through the shade playwhere he wrote:
We all know which regimes use 'bark on' comprehension to manipulate long-term favourable outcomes. Today, we saw this reveal in Malaysia when Anwar Ibrahim was clear of the sodomy charge notwithstanding the actuality which he will certainly go upon to be the thorn in the side of the BN-led sovereign government.
Anwar's intensity to confuse government, joined with the hysteria as well as fears, mean which the father of six would have been better off in jail or during slightest convicted of sodomy.
Whichever approach the result had gone, no the single in Pakatan would! regard the autonomy as well as integrity of the judge, as well as even if o! ne has, he/she would usually grudgingly express magnetism for the 'foolish' judge.
In the letter toMalaysiakinititledAnwar's acquittal: Why? as well as What happens next?Abdullah Junid wrote:
Orit could only be which Justice Mohamad Zabidin Mohd Diah really motionless to acquit Anwar based quite upon the (suspect) evidence. If that's the case, the great judge is the really brave as well as hopefully not ridiculous man.
indicating his dishonesty during the judge's ruling.
Also do note my underlining of the word 'Or' indicating the writer's afterthought as to what he had surmised in the first place, which was,'... the Najib administration department either gave in to fear or grabbed the high-profile event to put the opposition off-balance as well as consequence PR spirit points upon the global theatre ...'.
Charles Santiago summed it up best by stating:Likewise they contingency assimilate which Malaysians will not interpret Anwar's acquittal to mean the law is independent. They can see through the shade fool around by Najib to recover the confidence of the people.
Today's visualisation is the feat for the people. It demonstrates the power of the people.
If we were to interpret the above statement in the misfortune possible light, then Charles Santiago (bearing in thoughts I'm the DAP supporter) has probably stated, unwittingly if we might add, the judge gave in to mob rule, as well as not since the prosecution unsuccessful to make the box opposite Anwar.
Of march I'm being devilish, as in playing the 'devil's advocate', wakakaka.
As we mentioned during the top:Alas, really few Malaysians have conviction in the autonomy as well as integrity of the judiciary, as well as can we censure the majority?
Incidentally,! since the expectation, generally by PKR, was for the guilty result which would have seen Anwar Ibrahim sentenced, most prematurely went berserk when RPK pronounced which Anwar would embrace the satisfactory trial.
But in spite of the justice finding in favour of Anwar Ibrahim, given the prevalence of conspiracy theories which the 'not guilty' result has been Najib's conniving plot, there won't be any relief for, let alone an reparation to RPK wakakaka.
Thus the improvement to what we had pronounced earlier about meaningful the single loser; we could contend RPK, similar to the judiciary, is additionally the loser, though by default. My recommendation to RPK is the allude to by Pat Riley:
"You have no choices about how we lose, though we do have the choice about how we come back as well as prepare to win again."
Who then is the leader as well as crook of the trial's outcome?
I leave which to the experts yet we do know of usually the single loser, the Bench!
Alas, really few Malaysians have conviction in the autonomy as well as integrity of the judiciary, as well as can we censure the majority?
As the Court discharged the charges opposite Anwar Ibrahim, the Pakatan 'experts' are already analyzing, right away get this, WHY the justice had not found him guilty, instead of awaiting which the result was, as Karpal Singh predicted, the natural result for the prosecutor's paucity of plain evidence.
Look, even Anwar Ibrahim himself was surprised by the verdict.
For an e.g. of the deep set guess by most about the motives of the court, as well as by the alleged nexus, thus of "Anwar Ibrahim", see Charles Santiago'sSeeing through the shade playwhere he wrote:
We all know which regimes use 'bark on' comprehension to manipulate long-term favourable outcomes. Today, we saw this reveal in Malaysia when Anwar Ibrahim was clear of the sodomy charge notwithstanding the actuality which he will certainly go upon to be the thorn in the side of the BN-led sovereign government.
Anwar's intensity to confuse government, joined with the hysteria as well as fears, mean which the father of six would have been better off in jail or during slightest convicted of sodomy.
Whichever approach the result had gone, no the single in Pakatan would! regard the autonomy as well as integrity of the judge, as well as even if o! ne has, he/she would usually grudgingly express magnetism for the 'foolish' judge.
In the letter toMalaysiakinititledAnwar's acquittal: Why? as well as What happens next?Abdullah Junid wrote:
Orit could only be which Justice Mohamad Zabidin Mohd Diah really motionless to acquit Anwar based quite upon the (suspect) evidence. If that's the case, the great judge is the really brave as well as hopefully not ridiculous man.
indicating his dishonesty during the judge's ruling.
Also do note my underlining of the word 'Or' indicating the writer's afterthought as to what he had surmised in the first place, which was,'... the Najib administration department either gave in to fear or grabbed the high-profile event to put the opposition off-balance as well as consequence PR spirit points upon the global theatre ...'.
Charles Santiago summed it up best by stating:Likewise they contingency assimilate which Malaysians will not interpret Anwar's acquittal to mean the law is independent. They can see through the shade fool around by Najib to recover the confidence of the people.
Today's visualisation is the feat for the people. It demonstrates the power of the people.
If we were to interpret the above statement in the misfortune possible light, then Charles Santiago (bearing in thoughts I'm the DAP supporter) has probably stated, unwittingly if we might add, the judge gave in to mob rule, as well as not since the prosecution unsuccessful to make the box opposite Anwar.
Of march I'm being devilish, as in playing the 'devil's advocate', wakakaka.
As we mentioned during the top:Alas, really few Malaysians have conviction in the autonomy as well as integrity of the judiciary, as well as can we censure the majority?
Incidentally,! since the expectation, generally by PKR, was for the guilty result which would have seen Anwar Ibrahim sentenced, most prematurely went berserk when RPK pronounced which Anwar would embrace the satisfactory trial.
But in spite of the justice finding in favour of Anwar Ibrahim, given the prevalence of conspiracy theories which the 'not guilty' result has been Najib's conniving plot, there won't be any relief for, let alone an reparation to RPK wakakaka.
Thus the improvement to what we had pronounced earlier about meaningful the single loser; we could contend RPK, similar to the judiciary, is additionally the loser, though by default. My recommendation to RPK is the allude to by Pat Riley:
"You have no choices about how we lose, though we do have the choice about how we come back as well as prepare to win again."
POSTED BY KTEMOC
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment