"But it was my firmness which was important... It sells for so little, nonetheless it's all we have left in this place. It is a very last in. of us. But inside of which in. we have been free... An inch. It's tiny as good as it's fragile as good as it's a usually thing in a universe value having. We must never lose it, or sell it, or give it away."
- Valerie
That in. is a last magnitude of a male or woman. Honour it, as good as we go to your grave without a singular regret; stigma it, as good as we risk making all you've ever done meaningless. Which difficulty have been we in?
(Let me contend during a opening which we have no seductiveness in pursuing a small personal argument with RPK or anyone else. As my father says, friends have been friends, commercial operation is business. I'm not meddlesome in observant who can shout a loudest or with a most bravado; usually in separating sound as good as ire from attempted as good as constant values.)
Malaysia is home to a good series of politicians, activists as good as commentators which have 'switched sides' any series of times.
Examples include Ibrahim Ali, a frog we most similar to to point to; a three Perak assemblymen who toppled their state government; KS Nallakarupan who went from MIC to PKR to whatever obscure place he is right away (not distinct Zaid Ibrahim we suppose).
The record for domestic promiscuity competence be held by Lim Boo Chang who went from Gerakan to MCA to PKR as good as right away wants to go behind to Gerakan.
From past observation, we consider my conclusion is: a people with a most credit have been a ones who never shift sides.
In second place have been a ones who shift sides usually once. Anyone who changes more t! han which is basically a joke. The subject we will all eventually be asked is: which difficulty have been we in?
People lend towards to be unforgiving of flip-flops as good as people who destroy to stay a course. we consider people similar to Hasan Ali have been right away learning this doctrine a tough way.
After all, a singular cannot credibly implicate a male in a brutal murder a singular day as good as a next happily suggest him recommendation upon how to remodel his party.
We note as good a sugar trap comments as good as pointed instigations by RPK (right) as good as Zaid which indicate which Anwar's homosexuality is a given, as good as deviously try to shift a right away not pertinent discourse as to whether Malaysia is ready for a gay PM.
The simple test is to see whether someone changes their positions formed upon principle, or formed upon expediency - a latter of which comes in most forms: money, power, as good as perhaps most underrated of all, ego. The former demonstrates itself by consistency, objectivity as good as genuine independence. Which difficulty have been we in?
The Ezam syndrome
There i! s a phen omenon quite usual in Malaysia which we similar to to describe as a Ezam syndrome.
I hold which aspiring politicians in Malaysia should take good caring in pursuing a together profession or source of income.
Failure to do so essentially compromises one's own financial independence, as good as stakes his or her complete aptitude upon their domestic career.
The complaint with this of march is which should we ever have a domestic fallout with a powers which be, most people would find themselves flattering most screwed out of options.
A good most who have met such a fate found themselves grasping during straws (BN) to maintain their open aptitude and/or their livelihoods.
When people come in this unhappy stage, you'll proceed to observe them apropos a summary of self-contradiction, where all th! ey once fought for starts entrance dismantled during their own hands.
While they have tire screeching U-turns as good as reverse all their positions, they'll protest with Mahathiresque being distortion fields (to steal from Steve Jobs) which they have been in fact adhering to a same princi! ples a y have stuck to all along.
It's a sad thing to observe - a miss of anchoring beliefs as a greats succumb to sacrificing their last in. to stay afloat as good as relevant.
This phenomenon is understandable not usually in politicians, alas, nonetheless additionally infrequently in domestic observers.
RPK has, as he rightly points out, regularly been critical. I'm usually not certain he's regularly been constructive. People speak of his being paid for over, nonetheless we wouldn't presume to drawing conclusions without proof.
By my reckoning though, a motivations of his most recent comments appear during most appropriate to be fueled by a ego of a male who believes he is regularly right, a male who likes to be seen as someone who says whatever he damn good pleases, during your convenience he damn good pleases.
That's good for chest thumping, nonetheless I'm uncertain how most it helps a nation.
Notably, not everybody who falls out with their bosses or allies finish up this way. PKR itself is a good example of a good most people who have left out of disillusionment with Anwar as good as a celebration leadership, nonetheless did so relatively gracefully - no tantrums, no trying to rinse dirty linen in public.
Names such as Rahman Othman or Marina Yusuff might not mean most (as say, Chandra Muzaffar) to most of us, given how they chose to fade somewhat in to shade after withdrawal a party.
They might be out of a limelight now, nonetheless if ever they return, we daresay there's a good possibility they'll do so with their firm! ness int act. we can't assistance meditative though, which a same cannot be said of others. Which difficulty have been we in?
Political parties: Warts as good as all
When we was operative for PKR around 2007-2008, we favourite to fun about how critics of a celebration were so angry about what was often misinformation; we regularly said, if usually they unequivocally knew all a truths which a celebration insiders did, then they'd have a lot more to get much, most angrier about.
The odd thing was though, which those insiders - most of them being a small of a most honourable, principled people we have every had a privilege to encounter - chose to stick with a movement, warts as good as all.
It doesn't lay easy with me when people with half those beliefs try to suggest which those who stay upon do so out of left-wing friendship to any a singular person or a small misled faithfulness to blind partisanship. we hold they stayed because they kept their focus upon a bigger picture.
I know RPK cares tiny for Anwar, as good as a approach things have been run in PKR. That's positively his right, as good as if he feels which Anwar's constant lieutenants should be private from a celebration leadership, there's a approach for we do so which he might have heard of: it's called elections.
The universe looks a tiny different to people who've actually put themselves out there as good as contested an election.
We additionally note with ironic seductiveness RPK's vague comments per alleged crime in Selangor, given which by distant a greatest disgruntlement opposite Khalid Ibrahim's administration department (who, we should disclose, we work for), is which Selangor is right away run so cleanly which a contracts which used to feed a domestic machine as good as sycophants alike have been no longer up for grabs. we guess tha! t's a so rt of thing which would perplex people.
There is an complete universe of things we would really, unequivocally similar to to shift inside of PKR if we could. Not all RPK says about a celebration as good as its inner dynamics is groundless - not by a long shot.
Ideology plays second fiddle to celebrity in almost every singular Malaysian domestic party, a sad thoughtfulness of a domestic maturity.
Many BN celebration factions have been widely separated internally along a interests of different sets of cronies, where distinct process differences have been made to be justifications of factional divisions, instead of being a root of them. PKR, DAP as good as to a slightly obtuse border PAS humour similar symptoms.
In PKR, alongside a small of a most sincere, principled, hardworking people we know, there have been left-wing Anwaristas, people out to have a discerning buck, as good as people who usually manage to be disturbing upon an extraordinary series of levels.
The droll thing though, is which a last nature of any organization is determined in a finish by a people inside it, not a people outside it.
I do not harbour any delusions of grandeur as! to how large a role someone similar to me can play in such an organization here as good as now.
I will additionally openly confess (and steal from Aragon when we say) which a day might come when a courage of PKR fails, when they leave friends as good as mangle all bonds of fellowship as good as principle.
On such a day, we as good might part ways with a party, nonetheless it is not this day.
I know as good most people inside of which do not follow usually a singular male as good as hold all he says out of blind, invariable loyalty.
This is a element we would do good to follow both in Anwar's case as good as RPKs.
The bigger picture
A lot of people similar to to contend things like: "The electorate have been observant it. we am revelation we what a el! ectorate have been saying." Quite frankly, we put no batch in a views of armchair critics (much less those who have been perpetually overseas) who do not do any scientific investigate of such things.
One of a couple of merits of domestic aspirants is which they have been a usually ones peaceful to get in to a ring as good as put their income where their mouth is in anticipating out exactly what electorate have been saying.
Some people predict change, others have them - which difficulty have been we in?
Democracy is a process which needs to be participated in, not a ensign to be waved around while trying to do an bulletin by equates to entirely undemocratic.
If we want to behind a singular person or another, do so by all equates to - nonetheless ultimately, do not be misled in to meditative tha! t there have been shortcuts to gaining a await of a majority.
This runs foul of a basic doctrine those similar to RPK himself have attempted so tough to instill: which people have been not stupid.
Many of us determine upon a need for a improved Malaysia. Some of us even determine upon what which improved Malaysia looks like. Agreement upon how to get there is even harder to find.
After all a time I've spent observing as good as operative upon Malaysian issues, we consider my analysis is a same: a biggest bottleneck is political. No republic ruled by a same supervision for half a century can explain to be healthy. Rot inevitably sets in.
Those who have been peaceful to set in reserve a ego as good as see a bigger design know which a journey is a singular of most stairs - stairs which will expected have to be taken in sequence, during slightest until a day actually comes which Pakatan Rakyat truly abandons all principles.
Political shift is far, distant from a be all finish all. In my 'spare time', we dream up ideal alternat! ive dome stic systems as good as structures which residence all a evils as good as shortcomings of a dual celebration complement as good as pierce energy from politicians to people.
!
But my dreams will not nonetheless assistance Selvach; they won't forestall an additional Sarbani or Beng Hock; as good as they certain won't assistance Malaysians get a healthcare, preparation as good as peculiarity of life that's denied to them by constant rapine as good as corruption. Not yet, anyway.
What will assistance them in a nearby destiny is a robust dual celebration system; as good as a dual celebration complement does not exist in a republic which has usually known a singular government.
Once we cranky which hurdle, I'd gamble my bottom dollar which we'll all be behind here pressuring a new supervision to handle a approach it's supposed to, or get them voted out similar to a last one.
So, we figure we can assistance have which happen, or we can go on to try as good as sow a seeds of discord, disunity as good as doubt. Which difficulty have been we in?
- Valerie
That in. is a last magnitude of a male or woman. Honour it, as good as we go to your grave without a singular regret; stigma it, as good as we risk making all you've ever done meaningless. Which difficulty have been we in?
(Let me contend during a opening which we have no seductiveness in pursuing a small personal argument with RPK or anyone else. As my father says, friends have been friends, commercial operation is business. I'm not meddlesome in observant who can shout a loudest or with a most bravado; usually in separating sound as good as ire from attempted as good as constant values.)
Malaysia is home to a good series of politicians, activists as good as commentators which have 'switched sides' any series of times.
Examples include Ibrahim Ali, a frog we most similar to to point to; a three Perak assemblymen who toppled their state government; KS Nallakarupan who went from MIC to PKR to whatever obscure place he is right away (not distinct Zaid Ibrahim we suppose).
The record for domestic promiscuity competence be held by Lim Boo Chang who went from Gerakan to MCA to PKR as good as right away wants to go behind to Gerakan.
From past observation, we consider my conclusion is: a people with a most credit have been a ones who never shift sides.
In second place have been a ones who shift sides usually once. Anyone who changes more t! han which is basically a joke. The subject we will all eventually be asked is: which difficulty have been we in?
People lend towards to be unforgiving of flip-flops as good as people who destroy to stay a course. we consider people similar to Hasan Ali have been right away learning this doctrine a tough way.After all, a singular cannot credibly implicate a male in a brutal murder a singular day as good as a next happily suggest him recommendation upon how to remodel his party.
We note as good a sugar trap comments as good as pointed instigations by RPK (right) as good as Zaid which indicate which Anwar's homosexuality is a given, as good as deviously try to shift a right away not pertinent discourse as to whether Malaysia is ready for a gay PM.
The simple test is to see whether someone changes their positions formed upon principle, or formed upon expediency - a latter of which comes in most forms: money, power, as good as perhaps most underrated of all, ego. The former demonstrates itself by consistency, objectivity as good as genuine independence. Which difficulty have been we in?
The Ezam syndrome
There i! s a phen omenon quite usual in Malaysia which we similar to to describe as a Ezam syndrome.
I hold which aspiring politicians in Malaysia should take good caring in pursuing a together profession or source of income.
Failure to do so essentially compromises one's own financial independence, as good as stakes his or her complete aptitude upon their domestic career.
The complaint with this of march is which should we ever have a domestic fallout with a powers which be, most people would find themselves flattering most screwed out of options.
A good most who have met such a fate found themselves grasping during straws (BN) to maintain their open aptitude and/or their livelihoods.
When people come in this unhappy stage, you'll proceed to observe them apropos a summary of self-contradiction, where all th! ey once fought for starts entrance dismantled during their own hands.
While they have tire screeching U-turns as good as reverse all their positions, they'll protest with Mahathiresque being distortion fields (to steal from Steve Jobs) which they have been in fact adhering to a same princi! ples a y have stuck to all along.It's a sad thing to observe - a miss of anchoring beliefs as a greats succumb to sacrificing their last in. to stay afloat as good as relevant.
This phenomenon is understandable not usually in politicians, alas, nonetheless additionally infrequently in domestic observers.
RPK has, as he rightly points out, regularly been critical. I'm usually not certain he's regularly been constructive. People speak of his being paid for over, nonetheless we wouldn't presume to drawing conclusions without proof.
By my reckoning though, a motivations of his most recent comments appear during most appropriate to be fueled by a ego of a male who believes he is regularly right, a male who likes to be seen as someone who says whatever he damn good pleases, during your convenience he damn good pleases.
That's good for chest thumping, nonetheless I'm uncertain how most it helps a nation.
Notably, not everybody who falls out with their bosses or allies finish up this way. PKR itself is a good example of a good most people who have left out of disillusionment with Anwar as good as a celebration leadership, nonetheless did so relatively gracefully - no tantrums, no trying to rinse dirty linen in public.
Names such as Rahman Othman or Marina Yusuff might not mean most (as say, Chandra Muzaffar) to most of us, given how they chose to fade somewhat in to shade after withdrawal a party.
They might be out of a limelight now, nonetheless if ever they return, we daresay there's a good possibility they'll do so with their firm! ness int act. we can't assistance meditative though, which a same cannot be said of others. Which difficulty have been we in?
Political parties: Warts as good as all
When we was operative for PKR around 2007-2008, we favourite to fun about how critics of a celebration were so angry about what was often misinformation; we regularly said, if usually they unequivocally knew all a truths which a celebration insiders did, then they'd have a lot more to get much, most angrier about.
The odd thing was though, which those insiders - most of them being a small of a most honourable, principled people we have every had a privilege to encounter - chose to stick with a movement, warts as good as all.
It doesn't lay easy with me when people with half those beliefs try to suggest which those who stay upon do so out of left-wing friendship to any a singular person or a small misled faithfulness to blind partisanship. we hold they stayed because they kept their focus upon a bigger picture.
I know RPK cares tiny for Anwar, as good as a approach things have been run in PKR. That's positively his right, as good as if he feels which Anwar's constant lieutenants should be private from a celebration leadership, there's a approach for we do so which he might have heard of: it's called elections.
The universe looks a tiny different to people who've actually put themselves out there as good as contested an election.
We additionally note with ironic seductiveness RPK's vague comments per alleged crime in Selangor, given which by distant a greatest disgruntlement opposite Khalid Ibrahim's administration department (who, we should disclose, we work for), is which Selangor is right away run so cleanly which a contracts which used to feed a domestic machine as good as sycophants alike have been no longer up for grabs. we guess tha! t's a so rt of thing which would perplex people.There is an complete universe of things we would really, unequivocally similar to to shift inside of PKR if we could. Not all RPK says about a celebration as good as its inner dynamics is groundless - not by a long shot.
Ideology plays second fiddle to celebrity in almost every singular Malaysian domestic party, a sad thoughtfulness of a domestic maturity.
Many BN celebration factions have been widely separated internally along a interests of different sets of cronies, where distinct process differences have been made to be justifications of factional divisions, instead of being a root of them. PKR, DAP as good as to a slightly obtuse border PAS humour similar symptoms.
In PKR, alongside a small of a most sincere, principled, hardworking people we know, there have been left-wing Anwaristas, people out to have a discerning buck, as good as people who usually manage to be disturbing upon an extraordinary series of levels.
The droll thing though, is which a last nature of any organization is determined in a finish by a people inside it, not a people outside it.
I do not harbour any delusions of grandeur as! to how large a role someone similar to me can play in such an organization here as good as now.
I will additionally openly confess (and steal from Aragon when we say) which a day might come when a courage of PKR fails, when they leave friends as good as mangle all bonds of fellowship as good as principle.
On such a day, we as good might part ways with a party, nonetheless it is not this day.
I know as good most people inside of which do not follow usually a singular male as good as hold all he says out of blind, invariable loyalty.
This is a element we would do good to follow both in Anwar's case as good as RPKs.
The bigger picture
A lot of people similar to to contend things like: "The electorate have been observant it. we am revelation we what a el! ectorate have been saying." Quite frankly, we put no batch in a views of armchair critics (much less those who have been perpetually overseas) who do not do any scientific investigate of such things.
One of a couple of merits of domestic aspirants is which they have been a usually ones peaceful to get in to a ring as good as put their income where their mouth is in anticipating out exactly what electorate have been saying.
Some people predict change, others have them - which difficulty have been we in?
Democracy is a process which needs to be participated in, not a ensign to be waved around while trying to do an bulletin by equates to entirely undemocratic.
If we want to behind a singular person or another, do so by all equates to - nonetheless ultimately, do not be misled in to meditative tha! t there have been shortcuts to gaining a await of a majority.
This runs foul of a basic doctrine those similar to RPK himself have attempted so tough to instill: which people have been not stupid.
Many of us determine upon a need for a improved Malaysia. Some of us even determine upon what which improved Malaysia looks like. Agreement upon how to get there is even harder to find.
After all a time I've spent observing as good as operative upon Malaysian issues, we consider my analysis is a same: a biggest bottleneck is political. No republic ruled by a same supervision for half a century can explain to be healthy. Rot inevitably sets in.Those who have been peaceful to set in reserve a ego as good as see a bigger design know which a journey is a singular of most stairs - stairs which will expected have to be taken in sequence, during slightest until a day actually comes which Pakatan Rakyat truly abandons all principles.
Political shift is far, distant from a be all finish all. In my 'spare time', we dream up ideal alternat! ive dome stic systems as good as structures which residence all a evils as good as shortcomings of a dual celebration complement as good as pierce energy from politicians to people.
!
But my dreams will not nonetheless assistance Selvach; they won't forestall an additional Sarbani or Beng Hock; as good as they certain won't assistance Malaysians get a healthcare, preparation as good as peculiarity of life that's denied to them by constant rapine as good as corruption. Not yet, anyway.
What will assistance them in a nearby destiny is a robust dual celebration system; as good as a dual celebration complement does not exist in a republic which has usually known a singular government.
Once we cranky which hurdle, I'd gamble my bottom dollar which we'll all be behind here pressuring a new supervision to handle a approach it's supposed to, or get them voted out similar to a last one.
So, we figure we can assistance have which happen, or we can go on to try as good as sow a seeds of discord, disunity as good as doubt. Which difficulty have been we in?
NATHANIEL TANbelieves this universe is full of people, he was born to adore them all. He blogs atwww.jelas.infoand tweets@NatAsasi"
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment